The effect of sacubitril/valsartan on urinary C-peptide excretion and endogenous insulin secretory capacity in a patient with type 2 diabetes: a case report.

IF 1.2 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Shun Onodera, Masashi Miyamae, Issei Higuchi, Shunsuke Nashimoto, Akinobu Nakamura, Mitsuru Sugawara, Yoh Takekuma
{"title":"The effect of sacubitril/valsartan on urinary C-peptide excretion and endogenous insulin secretory capacity in a patient with type 2 diabetes: a case report.","authors":"Shun Onodera, Masashi Miyamae, Issei Higuchi, Shunsuke Nashimoto, Akinobu Nakamura, Mitsuru Sugawara, Yoh Takekuma","doi":"10.1186/s40780-025-00472-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The evaluation of endogenous insulin secretory capacity is important in the selection of diabetes treatment. C-peptide, which is secreted in equivalent amounts as insulin, is a versatile test for this evaluation. Urinary C-peptide is widely used because it is less invasive. Sacubitril/valsartan, used to treat hypertension and chronic heart failure, has been reported to increase urinary C-peptide levels; however, its effect on endogenous insulin secretion remains unknown. In this report, we present a case in which insulin secretory capacity was evaluated according to a glucagon stimulation test in addition to urinary C-peptide levels in a patient receiving sacubitril/valsartan.</p><p><strong>Case presentation: </strong>A male patient in his 50s with type 2 diabetes and hypertension, without renal dysfunction, was treated with sacubitril/valsartan. The results of the glucagon stimulation test showed a C-peptide change of 2.28, and the C-peptide index on the same day was 1.25, indicating normal endogenous insulin secretory capacity. In contrast, 24-h urinary C-peptide excretion was abnormally high at 615.2 µg/day. After discontinuation of sacubitril/valsartan, urinary C-peptide excretion decreased over time (615.2 to 369.0 µg/day), but blood glucose levels did not increase during this period.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this case, 24-h urinary C-peptide excretion was abnormally elevated despite preserved endogenous insulin secretory capacity, as assessed by the glucagon stimulation test. Although this observation is based on a single case and cannot be generalized, it suggests that sacubitril/valsartan may interfere with the interpretation of urinary C-peptide levels. Therefore, in such clinical contexts, dynamic tests such as the glucagon stimulation test may serve as a useful adjunct to avoid potential overestimation of insulin secretory capacity when relying solely on urinary C-peptide levels.</p>","PeriodicalId":16730,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmaceutical Health Care and Sciences","volume":"11 1","pages":"75"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12359982/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pharmaceutical Health Care and Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40780-025-00472-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The evaluation of endogenous insulin secretory capacity is important in the selection of diabetes treatment. C-peptide, which is secreted in equivalent amounts as insulin, is a versatile test for this evaluation. Urinary C-peptide is widely used because it is less invasive. Sacubitril/valsartan, used to treat hypertension and chronic heart failure, has been reported to increase urinary C-peptide levels; however, its effect on endogenous insulin secretion remains unknown. In this report, we present a case in which insulin secretory capacity was evaluated according to a glucagon stimulation test in addition to urinary C-peptide levels in a patient receiving sacubitril/valsartan.

Case presentation: A male patient in his 50s with type 2 diabetes and hypertension, without renal dysfunction, was treated with sacubitril/valsartan. The results of the glucagon stimulation test showed a C-peptide change of 2.28, and the C-peptide index on the same day was 1.25, indicating normal endogenous insulin secretory capacity. In contrast, 24-h urinary C-peptide excretion was abnormally high at 615.2 µg/day. After discontinuation of sacubitril/valsartan, urinary C-peptide excretion decreased over time (615.2 to 369.0 µg/day), but blood glucose levels did not increase during this period.

Conclusions: In this case, 24-h urinary C-peptide excretion was abnormally elevated despite preserved endogenous insulin secretory capacity, as assessed by the glucagon stimulation test. Although this observation is based on a single case and cannot be generalized, it suggests that sacubitril/valsartan may interfere with the interpretation of urinary C-peptide levels. Therefore, in such clinical contexts, dynamic tests such as the glucagon stimulation test may serve as a useful adjunct to avoid potential overestimation of insulin secretory capacity when relying solely on urinary C-peptide levels.

Abstract Image

沙比利/缬沙坦对2型糖尿病患者尿c肽排泄和内源性胰岛素分泌能力的影响:1例报告
背景:内源性胰岛素分泌能力的评估在糖尿病治疗方案的选择中具有重要意义。c肽的分泌量与胰岛素相当,是一种通用的评估方法。尿c肽因其侵入性小而被广泛应用。据报道,用于治疗高血压和慢性心力衰竭的苏比里尔/缬沙坦会增加尿c肽水平;然而,其对内源性胰岛素分泌的影响尚不清楚。在本报告中,我们提出了一个病例,其中胰岛素分泌能力评估根据胰高血糖素刺激试验,除了尿c肽水平的患者接受苏比里尔/缬沙坦。病例介绍:1例50多岁男性2型糖尿病合并高血压患者,无肾功能障碍,采用苏比里尔/缬沙坦治疗。胰高血糖素刺激试验结果显示c肽变化为2.28,当日c肽指数为1.25,表明内源性胰岛素分泌能力正常。相比之下,24小时尿c肽排泄量异常高,为615.2µg/天。停用苏比里尔/缬沙坦后,尿c肽排泄量随时间减少(615.2至369.0µg/天),但在此期间血糖水平没有升高。结论:根据胰高血糖素刺激试验,该病例24小时尿c肽排泄量异常升高,尽管内源性胰岛素分泌能力保持不变。虽然这一观察结果是基于单一病例,不能一概而论,但它表明苏比里尔/缬沙坦可能干扰尿c肽水平的解释。因此,在这样的临床背景下,动态试验如胰高血糖素刺激试验可以作为一种有用的辅助手段,以避免单纯依赖尿c肽水平时对胰岛素分泌能力的潜在高估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信