Evaluation of clinical efficacy of Cention N and Tetric N-ceram in class I carious lesion in primary mandibular molars.

Q1 Medicine
Mayur Mhole, Sandeep Tandon, Shriya Gupta, Harshita Gosavi, A Rizwan Ali, Mineet Kaul
{"title":"Evaluation of clinical efficacy of Cention N and Tetric N-ceram in class I carious lesion in primary mandibular molars.","authors":"Mayur Mhole, Sandeep Tandon, Shriya Gupta, Harshita Gosavi, A Rizwan Ali, Mineet Kaul","doi":"10.1016/j.jobcr.2025.08.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Tetric N-Ceram, recently introduced as an alternative to bulk-fill flowable and traditional non-flowable composite. Cention N, recently introduced tooth-coloured filling material for bulk placement in retentive preparations.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim of the present study is to evaluate the performance of Tetric N Ceram and Cention N as restorative materials in Class 1 carious lesions in primary mandibular molars.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A prospective double-blind, split-mouth, parallel-group, randomized study was conducted on 34 patients having bilateral Class I carious lesions on mandibular primary molars. 68 teeth were divided into 2 groups: Group 1 was treated with Cention N and Group 2 with Tetric N Ceram. All restorations were clinically evaluated at Baseline - 24hrs, 3, 6 and 9 months for marginal integrity (MI), secondary caries(SC) and gross fracture(GF) using the US Public Health Service criteria (modified Ryge criteria). For post-operative sensitivity(POS), Wong Bakers faces pain rating scale was used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Intragroup comparison of MI, SC and GF in Group 1 and group 2 showed non-significant difference at all-time intervals. Intergroup comparison showed non-significant difference for MI, SC, GF and POS at all-time intervals.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Tetric N Ceram and Cention N in terms of MI, SC, GF and POS provide similar results.</p>","PeriodicalId":16609,"journal":{"name":"Journal of oral biology and craniofacial research","volume":"15 6","pages":"1231-1237"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12357292/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of oral biology and craniofacial research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobcr.2025.08.006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Tetric N-Ceram, recently introduced as an alternative to bulk-fill flowable and traditional non-flowable composite. Cention N, recently introduced tooth-coloured filling material for bulk placement in retentive preparations.

Aim: The aim of the present study is to evaluate the performance of Tetric N Ceram and Cention N as restorative materials in Class 1 carious lesions in primary mandibular molars.

Design: A prospective double-blind, split-mouth, parallel-group, randomized study was conducted on 34 patients having bilateral Class I carious lesions on mandibular primary molars. 68 teeth were divided into 2 groups: Group 1 was treated with Cention N and Group 2 with Tetric N Ceram. All restorations were clinically evaluated at Baseline - 24hrs, 3, 6 and 9 months for marginal integrity (MI), secondary caries(SC) and gross fracture(GF) using the US Public Health Service criteria (modified Ryge criteria). For post-operative sensitivity(POS), Wong Bakers faces pain rating scale was used.

Results: Intragroup comparison of MI, SC and GF in Group 1 and group 2 showed non-significant difference at all-time intervals. Intergroup comparison showed non-significant difference for MI, SC, GF and POS at all-time intervals.

Conclusion: Tetric N Ceram and Cention N in terms of MI, SC, GF and POS provide similar results.

氮化钙与氮化钙治疗下颌磨牙I级龋齿的临床疗效评价。
背景:n-陶瓷,最近被引入作为可流动和传统非流动复合材料的替代品。Cention N,最近推出了牙色填充材料,用于在固位制剂中大量放置。目的:评价氮化钛和氮化钛作为修复材料在初生下颌磨牙1级龋病中的应用效果。设计:对34例双侧下颌初级磨牙I类龋齿患者进行前瞻性双盲、裂口、平行组、随机研究。68颗牙分为2组:1组使用N型牙膜,2组使用N型牙膜。采用美国公共卫生服务标准(修订的Ryge标准),在基线- 24小时、3个月、6个月和9个月时对所有修复体进行边缘完整性(MI)、继发龋齿(SC)和总骨折(GF)的临床评估。术后敏感性(POS)采用Wong Bakers faces疼痛评定量表。结果:组内比较1、2组MI、SC、GF均无显著性差异。组间比较显示MI、SC、GF和POS在时间间隔上无显著差异。结论:在心肌梗死、SC、GF、POS等指标上,Tetric N Ceram与Cention N具有相似的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
133
审稿时长
167 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Oral Biology and Craniofacial Research (JOBCR)is the official journal of the Craniofacial Research Foundation (CRF). The journal aims to provide a common platform for both clinical and translational research and to promote interdisciplinary sciences in craniofacial region. JOBCR publishes content that includes diseases, injuries and defects in the head, neck, face, jaws and the hard and soft tissues of the mouth and jaws and face region; diagnosis and medical management of diseases specific to the orofacial tissues and of oral manifestations of systemic diseases; studies on identifying populations at risk of oral disease or in need of specific care, and comparing regional, environmental, social, and access similarities and differences in dental care between populations; diseases of the mouth and related structures like salivary glands, temporomandibular joints, facial muscles and perioral skin; biomedical engineering, tissue engineering and stem cells. The journal publishes reviews, commentaries, peer-reviewed original research articles, short communication, and case reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信