Whitlockite as a next-generation biomaterial for bone regeneration: A systematic review of In Vivo evidence for bone regeneration.

Q1 Medicine
Sinduja Palati, Dhanraj Ganapathy, Saravanan Sekaran
{"title":"Whitlockite as a next-generation biomaterial for bone regeneration: A systematic review of <i>In Vivo</i> evidence for bone regeneration.","authors":"Sinduja Palati, Dhanraj Ganapathy, Saravanan Sekaran","doi":"10.1016/j.jobcr.2025.08.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Whitlockite (WH), a magnesium-enriched calcium phosphate mineral, is emerging as a promising biomaterial in bone tissue engineering due to its chemical similarity to natural bone and dual role in promoting osteogenesis and regulating bone resorption. Compared to conventional materials like hydroxyapatite (HA) and β-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP), WH offers higher solubility, superior ion release (notably Mg<sup>2+</sup>), and enhanced bioactivity.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This systematic review evaluates the in vivo efficacy of WH-based biomaterials in bone regeneration. Key outcomes include bone volume fraction (BV/TV), bone mineral density (BMD), osteogenic marker expression, and histological bone quality.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive search of PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Central was conducted up to March 2025. Eligible studies assessed WH-based materials in animal bone defect models with quantifiable regenerative outcomes. Two reviewers independently performed data extraction and quality assessment using the SYRCLE Risk of Bias tool. Meta-analysis was not feasible due to significant heterogeneity across models, scaffold types, and endpoints.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventeen animal studies (rats, mice, rabbits) met inclusion criteria. WH was used in forms such as nanoparticles, granules, and scaffolds with polymers like chitosan and gelatin. WH consistently outperformed HA and β-TCP with up to a 2-6 % increase in BV/TV, BMD, and histological bone formation. Upregulation of ALP, OCN, RUNX2, and COL1 was observed. Doped WH variants and composites enhanced osteoinductive and angiogenic responses. No adverse effects were reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>WH demonstrates superior osteogenic and biocompatible properties over traditional calcium phosphates. Future standardized, long-term studies are needed to support clinical translation for orthopedic and dental bone regeneration.</p>","PeriodicalId":16609,"journal":{"name":"Journal of oral biology and craniofacial research","volume":"15 6","pages":"1176-1182"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12355052/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of oral biology and craniofacial research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobcr.2025.08.002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Whitlockite (WH), a magnesium-enriched calcium phosphate mineral, is emerging as a promising biomaterial in bone tissue engineering due to its chemical similarity to natural bone and dual role in promoting osteogenesis and regulating bone resorption. Compared to conventional materials like hydroxyapatite (HA) and β-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP), WH offers higher solubility, superior ion release (notably Mg2+), and enhanced bioactivity.

Objective: This systematic review evaluates the in vivo efficacy of WH-based biomaterials in bone regeneration. Key outcomes include bone volume fraction (BV/TV), bone mineral density (BMD), osteogenic marker expression, and histological bone quality.

Methods: A comprehensive search of PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Central was conducted up to March 2025. Eligible studies assessed WH-based materials in animal bone defect models with quantifiable regenerative outcomes. Two reviewers independently performed data extraction and quality assessment using the SYRCLE Risk of Bias tool. Meta-analysis was not feasible due to significant heterogeneity across models, scaffold types, and endpoints.

Results: Seventeen animal studies (rats, mice, rabbits) met inclusion criteria. WH was used in forms such as nanoparticles, granules, and scaffolds with polymers like chitosan and gelatin. WH consistently outperformed HA and β-TCP with up to a 2-6 % increase in BV/TV, BMD, and histological bone formation. Upregulation of ALP, OCN, RUNX2, and COL1 was observed. Doped WH variants and composites enhanced osteoinductive and angiogenic responses. No adverse effects were reported.

Conclusion: WH demonstrates superior osteogenic and biocompatible properties over traditional calcium phosphates. Future standardized, long-term studies are needed to support clinical translation for orthopedic and dental bone regeneration.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Whitlockite作为下一代骨再生生物材料:骨再生体内证据的系统回顾。
背景:惠特洛克石(Whitlockite, WH)是一种富镁磷酸钙矿物,具有与天然骨相似的化学性质和促进骨生成和调节骨吸收的双重作用,是一种很有前途的骨组织工程生物材料。与羟基磷灰石(HA)和β-磷酸三钙(β-TCP)等传统材料相比,WH具有更高的溶解度,更好的离子释放(特别是Mg2+)和增强的生物活性。目的:系统评价骨再生生物材料在体内的应用效果。主要结果包括骨体积分数(BV/TV)、骨矿物质密度(BMD)、成骨标志物表达和组织学骨质量。方法:综合检索PubMed、Web of Science、谷歌Scholar和Cochrane Central,检索截止至2025年3月。符合条件的研究评估了wh基材料在动物骨缺损模型中的可量化再生结果。两名审稿人使用sycle偏倚风险工具独立进行数据提取和质量评估。由于模型、支架类型和终点的显著异质性,meta分析是不可行的。结果:17项动物研究(大鼠、小鼠、家兔)符合纳入标准。WH以纳米颗粒、颗粒和壳聚糖和明胶等聚合物的支架等形式使用。WH持续优于HA和β-TCP,在BV/TV、骨密度和组织学骨形成方面增加了2- 6%。ALP、OCN、RUNX2、COL1表达上调。掺杂WH变体和复合材料增强了骨诱导和血管生成反应。无不良反应报告。结论:水灵比传统的磷酸钙具有更好的成骨和生物相容性。未来需要标准化的长期研究来支持骨科和牙科骨再生的临床转化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
133
审稿时长
167 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Oral Biology and Craniofacial Research (JOBCR)is the official journal of the Craniofacial Research Foundation (CRF). The journal aims to provide a common platform for both clinical and translational research and to promote interdisciplinary sciences in craniofacial region. JOBCR publishes content that includes diseases, injuries and defects in the head, neck, face, jaws and the hard and soft tissues of the mouth and jaws and face region; diagnosis and medical management of diseases specific to the orofacial tissues and of oral manifestations of systemic diseases; studies on identifying populations at risk of oral disease or in need of specific care, and comparing regional, environmental, social, and access similarities and differences in dental care between populations; diseases of the mouth and related structures like salivary glands, temporomandibular joints, facial muscles and perioral skin; biomedical engineering, tissue engineering and stem cells. The journal publishes reviews, commentaries, peer-reviewed original research articles, short communication, and case reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信