Efficacy of Dexmedetomidine as an Adjuvant to Ropivacaine for Intercostal Nerve Block in Elderly Patients Undergoing Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Esophagectomy: A randomized Double-Blinded Trial.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Journal of Pain Research Pub Date : 2025-08-12 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/JPR.S542327
Fayin Li, Pengfei Gao, Xianlong Zhang
{"title":"Efficacy of Dexmedetomidine as an Adjuvant to Ropivacaine for Intercostal Nerve Block in Elderly Patients Undergoing Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Esophagectomy: A randomized Double-Blinded Trial.","authors":"Fayin Li, Pengfei Gao, Xianlong Zhang","doi":"10.2147/JPR.S542327","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Esophagectomy is associated with significant postoperative pain and a pronounced perioperative stress response. Dexmedetomidine (DEX) has been widely recognized as an effective adjuvant to regional anesthesia across various surgical procedures. However, its efficacy and safety as an adjuvant to ropivacaine in elderly patients undergoing thoracoscopic esophagectomy remain unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of DEX.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 89 patients with the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-III were randomly assigned to two groups. The DR group received an intercostal nerve block with a mixture of 20 mL of 0.25% ropivacaine and 2 μg/kg of DEX, while the RP group received 20 mL of 0.25% ropivacaine alone. Plasma levels of epinephrine (E), norepinephrine (NE), and cortisol (COR) were measured perioperatively. Postoperative analgesia was assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), the cumulative dose of rescue analgesics, and the pump pressure required for rescue analgesia. Additionally, adverse events and satisfaction scores from both patients and thoracic surgeons were recorded. The Shapiro-Wilk test was applied for uniformly distributed. The values for baseline information were presented as the mean ±standard (SD), and compared using one-way ANOVA. Enumeration data were expressed as percentages or frequencies and compared using the Chi-square test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Postoperatively, plasma levels of E, NE, and COR decreased significantly in the DR group compared to the RP group. The duration of analgesia was longer in the DR group, with fewer requirements for rescue analgesia and a significantly extended time to the first analgesic request. VAS scores were significantly lower in the DR group. No significant adverse events were observed, and patient satisfaction with analgesia was significantly higher in the DR group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>DEX, when used as an adjuvant to intercostal nerve block, prolongs analgesic duration, improves pain control, and attenuates the perioperative stress response in elderly patients undergoing thoracoscopic esophagectomy.</p>","PeriodicalId":16661,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pain Research","volume":"18 ","pages":"4019-4027"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12357599/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pain Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S542327","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Esophagectomy is associated with significant postoperative pain and a pronounced perioperative stress response. Dexmedetomidine (DEX) has been widely recognized as an effective adjuvant to regional anesthesia across various surgical procedures. However, its efficacy and safety as an adjuvant to ropivacaine in elderly patients undergoing thoracoscopic esophagectomy remain unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of DEX.

Methods: A total of 89 patients with the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-III were randomly assigned to two groups. The DR group received an intercostal nerve block with a mixture of 20 mL of 0.25% ropivacaine and 2 μg/kg of DEX, while the RP group received 20 mL of 0.25% ropivacaine alone. Plasma levels of epinephrine (E), norepinephrine (NE), and cortisol (COR) were measured perioperatively. Postoperative analgesia was assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), the cumulative dose of rescue analgesics, and the pump pressure required for rescue analgesia. Additionally, adverse events and satisfaction scores from both patients and thoracic surgeons were recorded. The Shapiro-Wilk test was applied for uniformly distributed. The values for baseline information were presented as the mean ±standard (SD), and compared using one-way ANOVA. Enumeration data were expressed as percentages or frequencies and compared using the Chi-square test.

Results: Postoperatively, plasma levels of E, NE, and COR decreased significantly in the DR group compared to the RP group. The duration of analgesia was longer in the DR group, with fewer requirements for rescue analgesia and a significantly extended time to the first analgesic request. VAS scores were significantly lower in the DR group. No significant adverse events were observed, and patient satisfaction with analgesia was significantly higher in the DR group.

Conclusion: DEX, when used as an adjuvant to intercostal nerve block, prolongs analgesic duration, improves pain control, and attenuates the perioperative stress response in elderly patients undergoing thoracoscopic esophagectomy.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

右美托咪定辅助罗哌卡因用于老年胸腔镜食管切除术肋间神经阻滞的疗效:一项随机双盲试验。
背景:食管切除术与明显的术后疼痛和明显的围手术期应激反应相关。右美托咪定(DEX)已被广泛认为是各种外科手术中区域麻醉的有效辅助剂。然而,其作为罗哌卡因辅助治疗胸腔镜食管切除术老年患者的有效性和安全性尚不清楚。本研究旨在评价DEX的有效性和安全性。方法:89例美国麻醉医师学会(ASA)身体状态为I-III级的患者随机分为两组。DR组给予0.25%罗哌卡因20 mL + 2 μg/kg右咪唑的混合肋间神经阻滞,RP组单独给予0.25%罗哌卡因20 mL。围手术期测定血浆肾上腺素(E)、去甲肾上腺素(NE)、皮质醇(COR)水平。术后镇痛采用视觉模拟评分(VAS)、镇痛药累积剂量、镇痛所需泵压进行评估。此外,记录患者和胸外科医生的不良事件和满意度评分。采用Shapiro-Wilk检验进行均匀分布。基线信息的值以均数±标准差(SD)表示,并使用单因素方差分析进行比较。计数数据以百分比或频率表示,并使用卡方检验进行比较。结果:与RP组相比,DR组术后血浆E、NE、COR水平明显降低。DR组镇痛持续时间较长,对抢救性镇痛的要求较少,到第一次镇痛要求的时间明显延长。DR组VAS评分明显较低。未观察到明显的不良事件,DR组患者对镇痛的满意度明显更高。结论:DEX作为肋间神经阻滞的辅助用药,可延长老年胸腔镜食管切除术患者的镇痛时间,改善疼痛控制,减轻围手术期应激反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Pain Research
Journal of Pain Research CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
3.70%
发文量
411
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Pain Research is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal that welcomes laboratory and clinical findings in the fields of pain research and the prevention and management of pain. Original research, reviews, symposium reports, hypothesis formation and commentaries are all considered for publication. Additionally, the journal now welcomes the submission of pain-policy-related editorials and commentaries, particularly in regard to ethical, regulatory, forensic, and other legal issues in pain medicine, and to the education of pain practitioners and researchers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信