A Scoping Review of Clinical Utility from the Montreal Cognitive Assessment Memory Index Score.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Oscar R Kronenberger, Alyssa N Kaser, Jeff Schaffert, Vishal J Thakkar, William Goette, Christian LoBue, Laura H Lacritz
{"title":"A Scoping Review of Clinical Utility from the Montreal Cognitive Assessment Memory Index Score.","authors":"Oscar R Kronenberger, Alyssa N Kaser, Jeff Schaffert, Vishal J Thakkar, William Goette, Christian LoBue, Laura H Lacritz","doi":"10.1177/08919887251366698","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectiveThe Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) Memory Index Score (MIS) is a supplemental assessment of memory composed of word list delayed free-recall followed by step-down category cued- and multiple-choice cued-recall. This paper reviews the MIS literature within Alzheimer's and other neurodegenerative dementias to synthesize evidence regarding its clinical utility, identify gaps, and inform future research directions.MethodWe searched electronic databases of OVID Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, and PubMed from 2014, when the MIS was first described, to July 2025. Peer-reviewed studies that reported data on the diagnostic or prognostic utility of the MIS in assessing neurodegenerative dementia populations were included.ResultsWe screened 278 articles, and 14 were included in the review. The current literature includes limited reporting on the diagnostic or prognostic utility of the MIS and is characterized by minimal diversity of samples and non-rigorous validation methods. Initial findings are promising and suggestive of incremental validity over the MoCA total score for identifying episodic memory impairment and therefore aiding in differentiation of suspected dementia etiology. However, evidence is insubstantial for the MIS as a tool for predicting progression and additional research is needed to evaluate the incremental validity of the MIS over the conventional MoCA five-word recall score.ConclusionsLarge literature gaps exist regarding the clinical utility of the MIS within neurodegenerative dementias. Additional research exploring the psychometric properties of the MIS using diverse samples with rigorous validation methods is needed to better inform its application.</p>","PeriodicalId":16028,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology","volume":" ","pages":"8919887251366698"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08919887251366698","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ObjectiveThe Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) Memory Index Score (MIS) is a supplemental assessment of memory composed of word list delayed free-recall followed by step-down category cued- and multiple-choice cued-recall. This paper reviews the MIS literature within Alzheimer's and other neurodegenerative dementias to synthesize evidence regarding its clinical utility, identify gaps, and inform future research directions.MethodWe searched electronic databases of OVID Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, and PubMed from 2014, when the MIS was first described, to July 2025. Peer-reviewed studies that reported data on the diagnostic or prognostic utility of the MIS in assessing neurodegenerative dementia populations were included.ResultsWe screened 278 articles, and 14 were included in the review. The current literature includes limited reporting on the diagnostic or prognostic utility of the MIS and is characterized by minimal diversity of samples and non-rigorous validation methods. Initial findings are promising and suggestive of incremental validity over the MoCA total score for identifying episodic memory impairment and therefore aiding in differentiation of suspected dementia etiology. However, evidence is insubstantial for the MIS as a tool for predicting progression and additional research is needed to evaluate the incremental validity of the MIS over the conventional MoCA five-word recall score.ConclusionsLarge literature gaps exist regarding the clinical utility of the MIS within neurodegenerative dementias. Additional research exploring the psychometric properties of the MIS using diverse samples with rigorous validation methods is needed to better inform its application.

蒙特利尔认知评估记忆指数评分的临床应用综述。
目的蒙特利尔认知评估(MoCA)记忆指数评分(MIS)是一种由词表延迟自由回忆、降压类别提示回忆和多项选择提示回忆组成的记忆补充评价方法。本文回顾了MIS在阿尔茨海默病和其他神经退行性痴呆中的文献,以综合有关其临床应用的证据,找出差距,并为未来的研究方向提供信息。方法检索2014年至2025年7月OVID Medline、Embase、PsycINFO、PubMed等电子数据库。同行评审的研究报告了MIS在评估神经退行性痴呆人群中的诊断或预后效用的数据。结果共筛选文献278篇,纳入文献14篇。目前的文献包括对MIS的诊断或预后效用的有限报道,其特点是样本多样性最小,验证方法不严格。初步的研究结果是有希望的,并提示了MoCA总分在识别情景记忆障碍方面的增量有效性,从而有助于区分疑似痴呆的病因。然而,MIS作为预测进展的工具的证据不足,需要进一步的研究来评估MIS比传统的MoCA五字回忆分数的增量有效性。结论关于MIS在神经退行性痴呆中的临床应用,存在大量的文献空白。需要使用不同的样本和严格的验证方法来探索MIS的心理测量特性,以更好地为其应用提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology (JGP) brings together original research, clinical reviews, and timely case reports on neuropsychiatric care of aging patients, including age-related biologic, neurologic, and psychiatric illnesses; psychosocial problems; forensic issues; and family care. The journal offers the latest peer-reviewed information on cognitive, mood, anxiety, addictive, and sleep disorders in older patients, as well as tested diagnostic tools and therapies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信