Ai Shibata, Kaori Ishii, Neville Owen, Koichiro Oka
{"title":"Sedentary Behavior and Health Consequences: A Systematic Scoping Review of Prospective and Longitudinal Studies in Japan.","authors":"Ai Shibata, Kaori Ishii, Neville Owen, Koichiro Oka","doi":"10.2188/jea.JE20250140","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This scoping review summarizes and evaluates evidence from Japan on prospective relationships of sedentary behavior (too much sitting as distinct from too little physical activity) with health outcomes, forming the basis for Japan's new sedentary behavior guidelines. It also identified evidence gaps and provided recommendations for future public health guidelines.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, CINAHL, and MEDLINE for English-language, peer-reviewed longitudinal studies on sedentary behavior and health outcomes in apparently healthy Japanese adults published between 2000 and 2023. The search strategy was developed based on sedentary behavior measures, study design, and study population. Two independent reviewers screened titles, abstracts, and full texts. Data were synthesized narratively, with a quality assessment performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-seven relevant studies were identified, all but one published after 2013. About half focused on middle-aged and older adults, primarily using self-report questionnaires. Many studies were large cohorts (>10,000 participants) with follow-ups of more than 10 years. Studies varied widely in physical activity indicators, confounders, time classifications, and cutoff values for sedentary behavior. The studies examined 29 health outcomes, primarily all-cause mortality, cancer incidence, and cancer mortality. Most studies reported at least partial evidence of harmful associations between sedentary behavior and health outcomes, though only eight were rated as good quality.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is sufficient evidence to support minimizing sedentary time to promote health in Japanese adults. However, due to the limited number of high-quality studies, the specificity and dose-response relationship between sedentary behavior and health outcomes remain unclear.</p>","PeriodicalId":15799,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2188/jea.JE20250140","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: This scoping review summarizes and evaluates evidence from Japan on prospective relationships of sedentary behavior (too much sitting as distinct from too little physical activity) with health outcomes, forming the basis for Japan's new sedentary behavior guidelines. It also identified evidence gaps and provided recommendations for future public health guidelines.
Methods: A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, CINAHL, and MEDLINE for English-language, peer-reviewed longitudinal studies on sedentary behavior and health outcomes in apparently healthy Japanese adults published between 2000 and 2023. The search strategy was developed based on sedentary behavior measures, study design, and study population. Two independent reviewers screened titles, abstracts, and full texts. Data were synthesized narratively, with a quality assessment performed.
Results: Twenty-seven relevant studies were identified, all but one published after 2013. About half focused on middle-aged and older adults, primarily using self-report questionnaires. Many studies were large cohorts (>10,000 participants) with follow-ups of more than 10 years. Studies varied widely in physical activity indicators, confounders, time classifications, and cutoff values for sedentary behavior. The studies examined 29 health outcomes, primarily all-cause mortality, cancer incidence, and cancer mortality. Most studies reported at least partial evidence of harmful associations between sedentary behavior and health outcomes, though only eight were rated as good quality.
Conclusion: There is sufficient evidence to support minimizing sedentary time to promote health in Japanese adults. However, due to the limited number of high-quality studies, the specificity and dose-response relationship between sedentary behavior and health outcomes remain unclear.
目的:本综述总结并评估了来自日本的关于久坐行为(久坐与少运动不同)与健康结果的潜在关系的证据,为日本新的久坐行为指南奠定了基础。它还确定了证据差距,并为未来的公共卫生指南提供了建议。方法:系统检索PubMed、Web of Science、CINAHL和MEDLINE,检索2000年至2023年间发表的关于表面健康的日本成年人久坐行为和健康结果的英文、同行评议的纵向研究。搜索策略是基于久坐行为测量、研究设计和研究人群制定的。两位独立审稿人筛选了题目、摘要和全文。数据以叙述的方式合成,并进行质量评估。结果:确定了27项相关研究,除一项外,其余均发表于2013年之后。大约一半的研究对象是中老年人,主要采用自我报告问卷。许多研究都是大型队列(1000万名参与者),随访时间超过10年。研究在身体活动指标、混杂因素、时间分类和久坐行为的临界值方面差异很大。这些研究检查了29项健康结果,主要是全因死亡率、癌症发病率和癌症死亡率。大多数研究报告至少有部分证据表明久坐行为与健康结果之间存在有害联系,尽管只有8项研究被评为质量良好。结论:有足够的证据支持减少久坐时间可以促进日本成年人的健康。然而,由于高质量的研究数量有限,久坐行为与健康结果之间的特异性和剂量反应关系尚不清楚。
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Epidemiology is the official open access scientific journal of the Japan Epidemiological Association. The Journal publishes a broad range of original research on epidemiology as it relates to human health, and aims to promote communication among those engaged in the field of epidemiological research and those who use epidemiological findings.