Influence of different size of prophylaxis brush on marginal microleakage and hybrid layer morphology of composite restorations.

Q2 Dentistry
Monique Evelin Pereira Da Silva, Maria Eduarda Da Silva Mendes, Tayná Souza Gomes da Silva, Danielle Ferreira Sobral-Souza, Marlon Ferreira Dias, Paulo Cardoso Lins Filho, Hilcia Mezzalira Teixeira, Audrey Nunes de Andrade, Antonio José Torres Neto, Renata Pedrosa Guimarães
{"title":"Influence of different size of prophylaxis brush on marginal microleakage and hybrid layer morphology of composite restorations.","authors":"Monique Evelin Pereira Da Silva, Maria Eduarda Da Silva Mendes, Tayná Souza Gomes da Silva, Danielle Ferreira Sobral-Souza, Marlon Ferreira Dias, Paulo Cardoso Lins Filho, Hilcia Mezzalira Teixeira, Audrey Nunes de Andrade, Antonio José Torres Neto, Renata Pedrosa Guimarães","doi":"10.4317/jced.62831","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Tooth cavity cleaning is a fundamental step to achieve greater adhesion in composite resins restorations. This study aimed to evaluate the influence of different sizes of prophylaxis brush on marginal microleakage and hybrid layer morphology in composite restorations.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Thirty Class V tooth preparations were distributed into 3 groups according to the type of cavity cleaning (n=10): G1: no prophylaxis; G2: Prophylaxis brush with regular size (Robson Brush Prophylaxis/DHPro); G3: Prophylaxis brush with reduced size (Robson Microtuft®/DHPro brush). After the respective cleaning protocol, third human molars were restored using a universal adhesive system (Single Bond Universal - 3M ESPE) and composite resin (FiltekTM Z350 XT 3M ESPE). To characterize the dentin substrate, the samples were prepared until the selective conditioning step and evaluated by scanning electron microscope (SEM) and hybrid layer's morphology was also evaluated after the restorative procedure (n=2). To assess the marginal microleakage, the sample were submitted to the thermocycling process, finished, and polished. After this step, the images were obtained by Micro-CT, and two calibrated evaluators scored the depth of dye penetration as 0 to 3. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare groups regarding marginal microleakage (<i>p</i><0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>G1 and G2 showed the presence of a gap between restoration and dentin, however, G3 showed greater regularity compared to the other groups. In microleakage scores, G1 showed more frequency for score 3 followed by G3 e G2 (<i>p</i>>0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Therefore, the Robson Microtuft® brush did not influence the marginal infiltration of the adhesive restorations, but the absence of prior prophylaxis increased the levels of infiltration and obtained a more irregular adhesive interface. <b>Key words:</b>Microleakage. marginal adaptation. universal adhesives.</p>","PeriodicalId":15376,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry","volume":"17 7","pages":"e764-e770"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12357503/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.62831","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Tooth cavity cleaning is a fundamental step to achieve greater adhesion in composite resins restorations. This study aimed to evaluate the influence of different sizes of prophylaxis brush on marginal microleakage and hybrid layer morphology in composite restorations.

Material and methods: Thirty Class V tooth preparations were distributed into 3 groups according to the type of cavity cleaning (n=10): G1: no prophylaxis; G2: Prophylaxis brush with regular size (Robson Brush Prophylaxis/DHPro); G3: Prophylaxis brush with reduced size (Robson Microtuft®/DHPro brush). After the respective cleaning protocol, third human molars were restored using a universal adhesive system (Single Bond Universal - 3M ESPE) and composite resin (FiltekTM Z350 XT 3M ESPE). To characterize the dentin substrate, the samples were prepared until the selective conditioning step and evaluated by scanning electron microscope (SEM) and hybrid layer's morphology was also evaluated after the restorative procedure (n=2). To assess the marginal microleakage, the sample were submitted to the thermocycling process, finished, and polished. After this step, the images were obtained by Micro-CT, and two calibrated evaluators scored the depth of dye penetration as 0 to 3. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare groups regarding marginal microleakage (p<0.05).

Results: G1 and G2 showed the presence of a gap between restoration and dentin, however, G3 showed greater regularity compared to the other groups. In microleakage scores, G1 showed more frequency for score 3 followed by G3 e G2 (p>0.05).

Conclusions: Therefore, the Robson Microtuft® brush did not influence the marginal infiltration of the adhesive restorations, but the absence of prior prophylaxis increased the levels of infiltration and obtained a more irregular adhesive interface. Key words:Microleakage. marginal adaptation. universal adhesives.

不同防刷尺寸对复合修复体边缘微渗漏及混杂层形态的影响
背景:牙腔清洁是复合树脂修复中获得更大附着力的基本步骤。本研究旨在评价不同尺寸的预防刷对复合修复体边缘微渗漏和混杂层形态的影响。材料与方法:30例V类牙齿制剂,按口腔清洁类型分为3组(n=10): G1组:无预防;G2:常规尺寸预防刷(Robson brush Prophylaxis/DHPro);G3:缩小尺寸的预防性刷(Robson Microtuft®/DHPro刷)。在各自的清洁方案之后,使用通用粘合剂系统(Single Bond universal - 3M ESPE)和复合树脂(FiltekTM Z350 XT 3M ESPE)修复第三颗人磨牙。为了表征牙本质底物,将样品制备至选择性调理步骤,并通过扫描电子显微镜(SEM)进行评估,并在修复过程后评估杂化层的形貌(n=2)。为了评估边际微泄漏,样品被提交到热循环过程中,完成和抛光。在这一步之后,Micro-CT获得图像,两个校准的评估器将染料渗透深度评分为0到3。使用Kruskal-Wallis检验比较各组的边缘微漏(结果:G1和G2组显示修复体与牙本质之间存在间隙,而G3组与其他组相比表现出更大的规律性。在微渗漏评分中,G1以3分最多,G3次之,G2次之(p < 0.05)。结论:因此,Robson Microtuft®刷头不影响黏着修复体的边缘浸润,但缺乏预先预防会增加浸润水平,并获得更不规则的黏着界面。关键词:微渗漏。边际适应。普遍的粘合剂。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
118
期刊介绍: Indexed in PUBMED, PubMed Central® (PMC) since 2012 and SCOPUSJournal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry is an Open Access (free access on-line) - http://www.medicinaoral.com/odo/indice.htm. The aim of the Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry is: - Periodontology - Community and Preventive Dentistry - Esthetic Dentistry - Biomaterials and Bioengineering in Dentistry - Operative Dentistry and Endodontics - Prosthetic Dentistry - Orthodontics - Oral Medicine and Pathology - Odontostomatology for the disabled or special patients - Oral Surgery
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信