Dimensional stability of pet-g clear aligners with different thickness through cyclic compressive load tests: An in vitro study.

Q2 Dentistry
Mauro Lorusso, Michele Tepedino, Gianluca Rendina, Angela Pia Cazzolla, Fariba Esperouz, Lucio Lo Russo, Domenico Ciavarella
{"title":"Dimensional stability of pet-g clear aligners with different thickness through cyclic compressive load tests: An <i>in vitro</i> study.","authors":"Mauro Lorusso, Michele Tepedino, Gianluca Rendina, Angela Pia Cazzolla, Fariba Esperouz, Lucio Lo Russo, Domenico Ciavarella","doi":"10.4317/jced.62842","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The purpose of this <i>in vitro</i> study was to evaluate the dimensional stability of PET-G clear aligners.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Two starting passive aligners of different thicknesses (0.75 mm and 0.88 mm) were subjected to cyclic compressive loading tests using the Instron 3343 testing machine in the laboratory, both with and without saliva. The intermolar and intercanine distances, measured in the occlusal direction, and the intermolar and intercanine Facial Axis (FA) distances, calculated between the most vestibular points of the crowns defined as Facial Axis points, were recorded using the dedicated software 3Shape Orthoviewer. Finally, the aligners were scanned using a laboratory scanner (3Shape TRIOS®) and then compared with the untested aligners of the control group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 0.75-mm-thick aligners exhibited greater dimensional stability than the 0.88-mm-thick aligners when measuring intercanine distance, both with and without saliva. In contrast, the 0.88-mm-thick aligners demonstrated greater stability than the 0.75-mm-thick aligners when measuring intermolar distance under the same conditions. In the measurement of FA distances, higher values were observed at the molar level when the tests were conducted both with and without saliva, whereas no significant changes were observed in the intercanine distance.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The 0.88-mm-thick aligners demonstrated better dimensional stability during tests with and without saliva in the intermolar distance, while the 0.75-mm-thick aligners showed better dimensional stability in the intercanine distance. <b>Key words:</b>Clear Aligners, PET-G, thickness, dimensional stability, cyclic compressive load tests.</p>","PeriodicalId":15376,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry","volume":"17 7","pages":"e779-e786"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12357505/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.62842","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the dimensional stability of PET-G clear aligners.

Material and methods: Two starting passive aligners of different thicknesses (0.75 mm and 0.88 mm) were subjected to cyclic compressive loading tests using the Instron 3343 testing machine in the laboratory, both with and without saliva. The intermolar and intercanine distances, measured in the occlusal direction, and the intermolar and intercanine Facial Axis (FA) distances, calculated between the most vestibular points of the crowns defined as Facial Axis points, were recorded using the dedicated software 3Shape Orthoviewer. Finally, the aligners were scanned using a laboratory scanner (3Shape TRIOS®) and then compared with the untested aligners of the control group.

Results: The 0.75-mm-thick aligners exhibited greater dimensional stability than the 0.88-mm-thick aligners when measuring intercanine distance, both with and without saliva. In contrast, the 0.88-mm-thick aligners demonstrated greater stability than the 0.75-mm-thick aligners when measuring intermolar distance under the same conditions. In the measurement of FA distances, higher values were observed at the molar level when the tests were conducted both with and without saliva, whereas no significant changes were observed in the intercanine distance.

Conclusions: The 0.88-mm-thick aligners demonstrated better dimensional stability during tests with and without saliva in the intermolar distance, while the 0.75-mm-thick aligners showed better dimensional stability in the intercanine distance. Key words:Clear Aligners, PET-G, thickness, dimensional stability, cyclic compressive load tests.

不同厚度pet-g透明对准器循环压缩载荷试验尺寸稳定性的体外研究
背景:本体外研究的目的是评价PET-G透明对准剂的尺寸稳定性。材料和方法:在实验室使用Instron 3343试验机对两种不同厚度(0.75 mm和0.88 mm)的启动被动对准器进行循环压缩加载试验,有和没有唾液。在咬合方向上测量磨牙间和犬牙间的距离,并使用专用软件3Shape Orthoviewer记录牙冠中定义为面部轴点的大多数前庭点之间的磨牙间和犬牙间的面部轴(FA)距离。最后,使用实验室扫描仪(3Shape TRIOS®)扫描牙齿矫正器,然后与对照组未测试的牙齿矫正器进行比较。结果:无论有无唾液,0.75 mm厚的牙齿矫正器在测量齿间距离时都比0.88 mm厚的牙齿矫正器具有更好的尺寸稳定性。相比之下,在相同条件下,0.88 mm厚的牙齿矫正器比0.75 mm厚的牙齿矫正器在测量臼齿间距时表现出更大的稳定性。在测量FA距离时,在有唾液和没有唾液的情况下,在磨牙水平上观察到更高的值,而在犬齿间距离上没有观察到明显的变化。结论:0.88 mm厚的牙齿矫正器在有和无唾液的情况下在磨牙间的尺寸稳定性较好,而0.75 mm厚的牙齿矫正器在磨牙间的尺寸稳定性较好。关键词:透明对准器,PET-G,厚度,尺寸稳定性,循环压缩载荷试验
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
118
期刊介绍: Indexed in PUBMED, PubMed Central® (PMC) since 2012 and SCOPUSJournal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry is an Open Access (free access on-line) - http://www.medicinaoral.com/odo/indice.htm. The aim of the Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry is: - Periodontology - Community and Preventive Dentistry - Esthetic Dentistry - Biomaterials and Bioengineering in Dentistry - Operative Dentistry and Endodontics - Prosthetic Dentistry - Orthodontics - Oral Medicine and Pathology - Odontostomatology for the disabled or special patients - Oral Surgery
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信