Brain vs. endocast: Does size differ? A unique experiment based on a cohort of 75 volunteers.

Abstract

Research on brain evolution centres mainly on internal mouldings of the skull, known as endocasts; however, the relationship between the size and asymmetry of the brain and endocasts has been poorly investigated in humans. Therefore, the main objective of this study was to investigate whether endocasts can be reliable indicators of brain size and asymmetry. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) of 75 participants was used to calculate the volume and surface area of the brain, the endocast, and their respective hemispheres. Two asymmetry indices (i.e. directional and absolute asymmetry) were used to assess the differences in volume and surface area between the sides of the brain and endocast. The Pearson correlation coefficient was calculated to assess the relationships between the parameters, and a Monte Carlo simulation for linear regression was performed to generate prediction equations for brain volume. The relationships between the level and direction of asymmetry indices were investigated using the Pearson correlation and McNemar's test, respectively. All correlations were statistically significant; however, correlation coefficients between volumes were stronger (0.894-0.931) than between volumes and surface areas (0.783-0.834). Brain volume can be predicted with high accuracy (ranging between 0.80 and 0.87) using the endocast total volume or the volume of one of the sides. The associations between the levels of asymmetry indices of the brain and endocast were non-significant; however, the McNemar's test indicated that endocasts show the same left- or right-biased asymmetry as the brain. This was the first study conducted on a large sample of brain and endocast data from the same individuals. The results demonstrated that brain volume can be accurately reconstructed using the volume of the endocast or one of its sides. This finding is especially important in the context of reconstructing fossil skulls, which are usually fragmented. Conversely, the asymmetry levels of endocast parameters are not reliable indicators of the actual level of brain volume asymmetry. Future research on fossils should focus on endocast asymmetry direction (left- or right-biased) as this closely corresponds with brain lateralisation.