Performance of disc diffusion and gradient strip test on different Mueller-Hinton agar media plates and ComASP® and Bruker UMIC® Cefiderocol Microdilution Panels for cefiderocol susceptibility testing in carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Stefano Mancini, Helena M B Seth-Smith, Natalia Kolesnik-Goldmann, Melanie Mermod, Vladimira Hinic, Tim Roloff, Muhammad Ali Syed, Irfan Ullah, Adrian Egli, Oliver Nolte
{"title":"Performance of disc diffusion and gradient strip test on different Mueller-Hinton agar media plates and ComASP® and Bruker UMIC® Cefiderocol Microdilution Panels for cefiderocol susceptibility testing in carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa.","authors":"Stefano Mancini, Helena M B Seth-Smith, Natalia Kolesnik-Goldmann, Melanie Mermod, Vladimira Hinic, Tim Roloff, Muhammad Ali Syed, Irfan Ullah, Adrian Egli, Oliver Nolte","doi":"10.1093/jac/dkaf301","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cefiderocol antimicrobial susceptibility testing requires standardized iron levels to produce consistent results. Here we assessed the analytical performances of two commercialized broth microdilution (BMD) methods (Bruker's UMIC and Liofilchem's ComASP), of disc diffusion (DD) and the gradient strip method on a collection of clinical carbapenem-resistant-Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CRPA) isolates.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A collection of 117 WGS-CRPA was used. Cefiderocol susceptibility was determined (i) by manual BMD (reference method) using iron-depleted Mueller-Hinton (ID-MH), (ii) with the UMIC and ComASP BMD panels, (iii) by DD and (iv) using the gradient strip test, these latter two on bioMérieux MH-agar, Liofilchem MH-agar, and in-house-produced iron-depleted (ID)-MH agar plates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Cefiderocol MIC50 and MIC90 were 1 and 4 mg/L, respectively. Eighteen isolates (15.4%) were classified as resistant (MIC > 2 mg/L) according to the standard EUCAST-based BMD. Overall, the ComASP panel showed the highest essential agreement (EA) with the standard BMD (82.1%), with a bias of -8.5%, and categorical agreement (CA) of 94%. The UMIC panel exhibited an EA of 74.4%, with a bias of 47%, and CA of 78.6%, exhibiting a tendency to overestimate the MICs. The EAs of the gradient strip test on bioMérieux-MH, Liofilchem-MH and ID-MH agar plates were 40.2%, 45.3% and 63.2%, respectively. Considering only categorizable results, the CAs of DD were 92.7%, 94.4% and 93.9%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The commercial ComASP panel may be used for cefiderocol testing of P. aeruginosa clinical isolates in diagnostic laboratories, ideally in combination with another method, such as the EUCAST-based DD. However, the standard manual BMD should still be performed to confirm the result when MICs are close to the breakpoint.</p>","PeriodicalId":14969,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy","volume":" ","pages":"2799-2806"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12494204/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkaf301","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cefiderocol antimicrobial susceptibility testing requires standardized iron levels to produce consistent results. Here we assessed the analytical performances of two commercialized broth microdilution (BMD) methods (Bruker's UMIC and Liofilchem's ComASP), of disc diffusion (DD) and the gradient strip method on a collection of clinical carbapenem-resistant-Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CRPA) isolates.

Methods: A collection of 117 WGS-CRPA was used. Cefiderocol susceptibility was determined (i) by manual BMD (reference method) using iron-depleted Mueller-Hinton (ID-MH), (ii) with the UMIC and ComASP BMD panels, (iii) by DD and (iv) using the gradient strip test, these latter two on bioMérieux MH-agar, Liofilchem MH-agar, and in-house-produced iron-depleted (ID)-MH agar plates.

Results: Cefiderocol MIC50 and MIC90 were 1 and 4 mg/L, respectively. Eighteen isolates (15.4%) were classified as resistant (MIC > 2 mg/L) according to the standard EUCAST-based BMD. Overall, the ComASP panel showed the highest essential agreement (EA) with the standard BMD (82.1%), with a bias of -8.5%, and categorical agreement (CA) of 94%. The UMIC panel exhibited an EA of 74.4%, with a bias of 47%, and CA of 78.6%, exhibiting a tendency to overestimate the MICs. The EAs of the gradient strip test on bioMérieux-MH, Liofilchem-MH and ID-MH agar plates were 40.2%, 45.3% and 63.2%, respectively. Considering only categorizable results, the CAs of DD were 92.7%, 94.4% and 93.9%, respectively.

Conclusions: The commercial ComASP panel may be used for cefiderocol testing of P. aeruginosa clinical isolates in diagnostic laboratories, ideally in combination with another method, such as the EUCAST-based DD. However, the standard manual BMD should still be performed to confirm the result when MICs are close to the breakpoint.

在不同的Mueller-Hinton琼脂培养基板和ComASP®和Bruker UMIC®头孢菌素微稀释板上进行头孢菌素对碳青霉烯耐药铜绿假单胞菌的药敏试验
背景:头孢地罗抗菌药敏试验需要标准化的铁水平以产生一致的结果。在这里,我们评估了两种商业化的肉汤微稀释(BMD)方法(Bruker的UMIC和Liofilchem的ComASP),圆盘扩散(DD)和梯度条法对临床耐碳青霉烯-铜绿假单胞菌(CRPA)分离物的分析性能。方法:采用WGS-CRPA标本117份。Cefiderocol的药敏试验是(i)使用缺铁Mueller-Hinton (ID-MH)进行手工骨密度测定(参比法),(ii)使用UMIC和ComASP骨密度测定板,(iii)使用DD和(iv)使用梯度条形试验,后两种试验分别在biomrieux mh -琼脂、Liofilchem mh -琼脂和自产的缺铁(ID)-MH琼脂板上进行。结果:头孢地罗MIC50、MIC90分别为1、4 mg/L。根据eucast标准BMD, 18株(15.4%)被分类为耐药菌株(MIC bb0 ~ 2 mg/L)。总体而言,ComASP小组与标准BMD的基本一致性(EA)最高(82.1%),偏差为-8.5%,分类一致性(CA)为94%。UMIC组的EA为74.4%,偏差为47%,CA为78.6%,显示出高估MICs的倾向。梯度条试验在biomrieux - mh、Liofilchem-MH和ID-MH琼脂板上的ea值分别为40.2%、45.3%和63.2%。仅考虑可分类结果,DD的ca分别为92.7%、94.4%和93.9%。结论:商用ComASP测试板可用于诊断实验室对铜绿假单胞菌临床分离株的头孢多酚检测,理想情况下可与另一种方法(如基于eucast的DD)结合使用。然而,当mic接近断点时,仍应执行标准手动BMD以确认结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
5.80%
发文量
423
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal publishes articles that further knowledge and advance the science and application of antimicrobial chemotherapy with antibiotics and antifungal, antiviral and antiprotozoal agents. The Journal publishes primarily in human medicine, and articles in veterinary medicine likely to have an impact on global health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信