SIGNIFY™ ER tricyclic antidepressant false positives in diphenhydramine overdose cases.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q3 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL
Noriko Nishimura, Sayaka Nagasawa, Go Inokuchi, Fumiko Chiba, Yumi Hoshioka, Naoki Saito, Maiko Yoshida, Shigeki Tsuneya, Yoshikazu Yamagishi, Hirotaro Iwase
{"title":"SIGNIFY™ ER tricyclic antidepressant false positives in diphenhydramine overdose cases.","authors":"Noriko Nishimura, Sayaka Nagasawa, Go Inokuchi, Fumiko Chiba, Yumi Hoshioka, Naoki Saito, Maiko Yoshida, Shigeki Tsuneya, Yoshikazu Yamagishi, Hirotaro Iwase","doi":"10.1093/jat/bkaf077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The SIGNIFY™ ER test for diphenhydramine (DPH) overdose yields false-positive results for tricyclic antidepressants (TCA) in multiple cases, complicating the identification of the causative substance of poisoning. We investigated the causes of TCA false positives in DPH overdose cases. From March 2021 to September 2023, 11 cases of DPH overdose with no concomitant TCA use were identified and categorized into two groups: four with false-positive TCA results (FPG) and seven with negative results (NG) in SIGNIFY™ ER. The blood and urinary DPH concentrations and the urinary concentrations of its three major metabolites (diphenhydramine N-oxide, DPH-NO; N-desmethyl diphenhydramine, DM-DPH; and diphenhydramine N-glucuronide, DPHG) were measured using liquid chromatography quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry, and differences between the groups were examined. Standard substances of DPH, DPH-NO, DM-DPH, DPHG, and mixtures of DPH-NO and DPHG at ratios of 50:50, 25:75, and 75:25 were added to blank urine samples, and TCA was measured using the SIGNIFY™ ER. The concentrations of the substances in the FPG and NG, respectively, were: blood DPH, 0.9-9 and 0.33-49 µg/mL; urinary DPH, 10-110 and 2.3-36 µg/mL; urinary DPH-NO, 110-170 and 0.05-10 µg/mL; urinary DM-DPH, 5.3-47 and 0.13-3.4 µg/mL; and urinary DPHG, 28-370 and 0.24-67 µg/mL. When using spiked urine samples, false positives were obtained for DPH, DPH-NO, DM-DPH, and DPHG at 500, 110, 200, and 70 µg/mL, respectively. In the mixtures of DPH-NO and DPHG, false positives were obtained at all three ratios. TCA false positives in the SIGNIFY™ ER test for DPH overdose cases are suggested to be yielded by DPH-NO and DPHG. For a positive test result without information on TCA use, DPH overdose should be considered.</p>","PeriodicalId":14905,"journal":{"name":"Journal of analytical toxicology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of analytical toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jat/bkaf077","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The SIGNIFY™ ER test for diphenhydramine (DPH) overdose yields false-positive results for tricyclic antidepressants (TCA) in multiple cases, complicating the identification of the causative substance of poisoning. We investigated the causes of TCA false positives in DPH overdose cases. From March 2021 to September 2023, 11 cases of DPH overdose with no concomitant TCA use were identified and categorized into two groups: four with false-positive TCA results (FPG) and seven with negative results (NG) in SIGNIFY™ ER. The blood and urinary DPH concentrations and the urinary concentrations of its three major metabolites (diphenhydramine N-oxide, DPH-NO; N-desmethyl diphenhydramine, DM-DPH; and diphenhydramine N-glucuronide, DPHG) were measured using liquid chromatography quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry, and differences between the groups were examined. Standard substances of DPH, DPH-NO, DM-DPH, DPHG, and mixtures of DPH-NO and DPHG at ratios of 50:50, 25:75, and 75:25 were added to blank urine samples, and TCA was measured using the SIGNIFY™ ER. The concentrations of the substances in the FPG and NG, respectively, were: blood DPH, 0.9-9 and 0.33-49 µg/mL; urinary DPH, 10-110 and 2.3-36 µg/mL; urinary DPH-NO, 110-170 and 0.05-10 µg/mL; urinary DM-DPH, 5.3-47 and 0.13-3.4 µg/mL; and urinary DPHG, 28-370 and 0.24-67 µg/mL. When using spiked urine samples, false positives were obtained for DPH, DPH-NO, DM-DPH, and DPHG at 500, 110, 200, and 70 µg/mL, respectively. In the mixtures of DPH-NO and DPHG, false positives were obtained at all three ratios. TCA false positives in the SIGNIFY™ ER test for DPH overdose cases are suggested to be yielded by DPH-NO and DPHG. For a positive test result without information on TCA use, DPH overdose should be considered.

表明™ER三环抗抑郁药假阳性在苯海拉明过量的情况下。
在多种情况下,用于苯海拉明(DPH)过量的SIGNIFY™ER测试在三环抗抑郁药(TCA)中产生假阳性结果,使中毒致病物质的鉴定复杂化。我们调查了DPH过量病例中TCA假阳性的原因。从2021年3月至2023年9月,鉴定了11例DPH过量且未同时使用TCA的病例,并将其分为两组:4例TCA结果假阳性(FPG), 7例阴性(NG)。采用液相色谱四极杆飞行时间质谱法测定血、尿DPH浓度及其三种主要代谢物(苯海拉明n -氧化物,DPH- no; n -去甲基苯海拉明,DM-DPH;苯海拉明n -葡萄糖醛酸盐,DPHG)尿浓度,并检测各组间差异。将DPH、DPH- no、DM-DPH、DPHG以及DPH- no和DPHG的混合物按50:50、25:75和75:25的比例加入空白尿液样本中,并使用SIGNIFY™ER测定TCA。FPG、NG中物质浓度分别为:血DPH 0.9 ~ 9、0.33 ~ 49µg/mL;尿DPH分别为10-110和2.3-36µg/mL;尿ph - no分别为110 ~ 170和0.05 ~ 10µg/mL;尿DM-DPH分别为5.3 ~ 47和0.13 ~ 3.4µg/mL;尿DPHG为28 ~ 370µg/mL, 0.24 ~ 67µg/mL。当使用加标尿液样本时,DPH、DPH- no、DM-DPH和DPHG分别在500、110、200和70µg/mL时出现假阳性。在DPH-NO和DPHG的混合物中,在所有三种比例下均获得假阳性。在DPH过量病例的SIGNIFY™ER测试中,TCA假阳性建议由DPH- no和DPHG产生。对于没有TCA使用信息的阳性检测结果,应考虑DPH过量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
20.00%
发文量
92
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Analytical Toxicology (JAT) is an international toxicology journal devoted to the timely dissemination of scientific communications concerning potentially toxic substances and drug identification, isolation, and quantitation. Since its inception in 1977, the Journal of Analytical Toxicology has striven to present state-of-the-art techniques used in toxicology labs. The peer-review process provided by the distinguished members of the Editorial Advisory Board ensures the high-quality and integrity of articles published in the Journal of Analytical Toxicology. Timely presentation of the latest toxicology developments is ensured through Technical Notes, Case Reports, and Letters to the Editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信