{"title":"Cold-water, Sulphur and 'the itch': James Henry's principles for conducting controlled trials (1843).","authors":"Max Cooper, Jo Middleton, Sarah Cooper","doi":"10.1007/s11845-025-04027-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>James Henry (1798-1876) was a Dublin physician and classical scholar best remembered for his translation of Virgil's Aeneid. Little is recorded about his medical practice.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To describe Henry's 1843 proposal for a controlled trial of treatment for 'the itch'.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Qualitative examination of historical medical journals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Henry suggests taking twelve patients and treating six with cold-water treatment and six with standard treatment (sulphur). Henry's proposal sets out four general principles for selecting diseases to study the alleged benefits of cold-water treatment. First, the condition should be one upon which it is safe to experiment. Second, the disease should be 'visible and tangible, and… cannot be simulated or misrepresented, or misunderstood'. Third, it should have no spontaneous recovery. Finally, there should already be a 'certain [i.e. proven] remedy'. Henry had published in 1834 on sulphur as a laxative. By calling for twelve participants, it is possible that Henry's proposal was influenced by the writing of Francis Hauksbee the Younger (1743) and James Lind (1753).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although there is no evidence that Henry's trial ever took place, his proposal and principles for selecting a disease to study reveal a critical and ethical mind. It also constitutes a notable landmark on the journey towards formal controlled trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":14507,"journal":{"name":"Irish Journal of Medical Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Irish Journal of Medical Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-025-04027-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: James Henry (1798-1876) was a Dublin physician and classical scholar best remembered for his translation of Virgil's Aeneid. Little is recorded about his medical practice.
Aim: To describe Henry's 1843 proposal for a controlled trial of treatment for 'the itch'.
Method: Qualitative examination of historical medical journals.
Results: Henry suggests taking twelve patients and treating six with cold-water treatment and six with standard treatment (sulphur). Henry's proposal sets out four general principles for selecting diseases to study the alleged benefits of cold-water treatment. First, the condition should be one upon which it is safe to experiment. Second, the disease should be 'visible and tangible, and… cannot be simulated or misrepresented, or misunderstood'. Third, it should have no spontaneous recovery. Finally, there should already be a 'certain [i.e. proven] remedy'. Henry had published in 1834 on sulphur as a laxative. By calling for twelve participants, it is possible that Henry's proposal was influenced by the writing of Francis Hauksbee the Younger (1743) and James Lind (1753).
Conclusion: Although there is no evidence that Henry's trial ever took place, his proposal and principles for selecting a disease to study reveal a critical and ethical mind. It also constitutes a notable landmark on the journey towards formal controlled trials.
期刊介绍:
The Irish Journal of Medical Science is the official organ of the Royal Academy of Medicine in Ireland. Established in 1832, this quarterly journal is a contribution to medical science and an ideal forum for the younger medical/scientific professional to enter world literature and an ideal launching platform now, as in the past, for many a young research worker.
The primary role of both the Academy and IJMS is that of providing a forum for the exchange of scientific information and to promote academic discussion, so essential to scientific progress.