Cold-water, Sulphur and 'the itch': James Henry's principles for conducting controlled trials (1843).

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Max Cooper, Jo Middleton, Sarah Cooper
{"title":"Cold-water, Sulphur and 'the itch': James Henry's principles for conducting controlled trials (1843).","authors":"Max Cooper, Jo Middleton, Sarah Cooper","doi":"10.1007/s11845-025-04027-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>James Henry (1798-1876) was a Dublin physician and classical scholar best remembered for his translation of Virgil's Aeneid. Little is recorded about his medical practice.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To describe Henry's 1843 proposal for a controlled trial of treatment for 'the itch'.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Qualitative examination of historical medical journals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Henry suggests taking twelve patients and treating six with cold-water treatment and six with standard treatment (sulphur). Henry's proposal sets out four general principles for selecting diseases to study the alleged benefits of cold-water treatment. First, the condition should be one upon which it is safe to experiment. Second, the disease should be 'visible and tangible, and… cannot be simulated or misrepresented, or misunderstood'. Third, it should have no spontaneous recovery. Finally, there should already be a 'certain [i.e. proven] remedy'. Henry had published in 1834 on sulphur as a laxative. By calling for twelve participants, it is possible that Henry's proposal was influenced by the writing of Francis Hauksbee the Younger (1743) and James Lind (1753).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although there is no evidence that Henry's trial ever took place, his proposal and principles for selecting a disease to study reveal a critical and ethical mind. It also constitutes a notable landmark on the journey towards formal controlled trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":14507,"journal":{"name":"Irish Journal of Medical Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Irish Journal of Medical Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-025-04027-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: James Henry (1798-1876) was a Dublin physician and classical scholar best remembered for his translation of Virgil's Aeneid. Little is recorded about his medical practice.

Aim: To describe Henry's 1843 proposal for a controlled trial of treatment for 'the itch'.

Method: Qualitative examination of historical medical journals.

Results: Henry suggests taking twelve patients and treating six with cold-water treatment and six with standard treatment (sulphur). Henry's proposal sets out four general principles for selecting diseases to study the alleged benefits of cold-water treatment. First, the condition should be one upon which it is safe to experiment. Second, the disease should be 'visible and tangible, and… cannot be simulated or misrepresented, or misunderstood'. Third, it should have no spontaneous recovery. Finally, there should already be a 'certain [i.e. proven] remedy'. Henry had published in 1834 on sulphur as a laxative. By calling for twelve participants, it is possible that Henry's proposal was influenced by the writing of Francis Hauksbee the Younger (1743) and James Lind (1753).

Conclusion: Although there is no evidence that Henry's trial ever took place, his proposal and principles for selecting a disease to study reveal a critical and ethical mind. It also constitutes a notable landmark on the journey towards formal controlled trials.

冷水、硫和“痒”:詹姆斯·亨利进行对照试验的原则(1843年)。
背景:詹姆斯·亨利(1798-1876)是都柏林的一位医生和古典学者,他因翻译了维吉尔的《埃涅伊德》而被人们铭记。关于他的行医记录很少。目的:描述亨利在1843年提出的一项治疗“瘙痒”的对照试验。方法:对历史医学期刊进行定性分析。结果:Henry建议选取12例患者,其中6例采用冷水治疗,6例采用标准治疗(硫磺)。亨利的建议列出了四个一般原则,用于选择疾病来研究所谓的冷水治疗的好处。首先,实验的条件应该是安全的。第二,这种疾病应该是“看得见摸得着的,而且……不能被模拟、歪曲或误解”。第三,不应出现自发复苏。最后,应该已经有一种“确定的(即经过验证的)治疗方法”。亨利在1834年发表了关于硫作为泻药的文章。通过召集12名参与者,亨利的提议可能受到弗朗西斯·豪克斯比(Francis Hauksbee the Younger, 1743)和詹姆斯·林德(James Lind, 1753)的影响。结论:虽然没有证据表明亨利的试验曾经发生过,但他选择一种疾病进行研究的建议和原则揭示了一种批判和道德的思想。这也是走向正式对照试验的一个重要里程碑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Irish Journal of Medical Science
Irish Journal of Medical Science 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
357
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Irish Journal of Medical Science is the official organ of the Royal Academy of Medicine in Ireland. Established in 1832, this quarterly journal is a contribution to medical science and an ideal forum for the younger medical/scientific professional to enter world literature and an ideal launching platform now, as in the past, for many a young research worker. The primary role of both the Academy and IJMS is that of providing a forum for the exchange of scientific information and to promote academic discussion, so essential to scientific progress.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信