Endothelin-1 in combination with CRB-65 enhance risk stratification in COVID-19 patients.

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Imrana Farhat, Maciej Rosolowski, Katharina Ahrens, Jasmin Lienau, Peter Ahnert, Mathias Pletz, Gernot Rohde, Jan Rupp, Martin Witzenrath, Markus Scholz
{"title":"Endothelin-1 in combination with CRB-65 enhance risk stratification in COVID-19 patients.","authors":"Imrana Farhat, Maciej Rosolowski, Katharina Ahrens, Jasmin Lienau, Peter Ahnert, Mathias Pletz, Gernot Rohde, Jan Rupp, Martin Witzenrath, Markus Scholz","doi":"10.1007/s15010-025-02627-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>COVID-19 continuously causes severe disease conditions and significant mortality. We evaluate whether easily accessible biomarkers can improve risk prediction of severe disease outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Our study analysed 426 COVID-19 patients collected by German CAPNETZ and PROGRESS study groups between 2020 and 2021. Troponin T high-sensitive (TnT-hs), procalcitonin (PCT), N-terminal pro brain natriuretic peptide, angiopoietin-2, copeptin, endothelin-1 (ET-1) and lipocalin-2 were measured at enrolment and related to 28d mortality/ICU admission endpoint. Logistic and relaxed LASSO regression were used to evaluate the added value of biomarkers compared to the CRB-65 score and to develop a combined risk prediction model for our endpoint.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 426 COVID-19 patients, 64 (15%) reached the endpoint. Among individual biomarkers, ET-1 showed the highest predictive performance (AUC = 0.76, 95% CI: 0.70-0.82). CRB-65 alone had an AUC of 0.63 (95% CI: 0.56-0.70). Our machine learning method identified CRB-65 + ET-1 to be optimal for prediction performance and model sparsity (AUC = 0.77, 95% CI: 0.71-0.83). Decision curve analysis demonstrated its greater net benefit over CRB-65 across large range of risk thresholds. The generalizability of our non-COVID CAP model (CRB-65 + TnT-hs + PCT) to COVID-19 patients was also assessed, yielding an AUC of 0.67 (95% CI: 0.60-0.74) for our primary endpoint. For 28d mortality alone as endpoint, it performed remarkably well (AUC = 0.90, 95% CI: 0.85-0.95).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Combining the already established clinical CRB-65 score with ET-1 significantly improves risk prediction of intensive care requirement or death within 28 days in hospitalized COVID-19 patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":13600,"journal":{"name":"Infection","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infection","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s15010-025-02627-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: COVID-19 continuously causes severe disease conditions and significant mortality. We evaluate whether easily accessible biomarkers can improve risk prediction of severe disease outcomes.

Methods: Our study analysed 426 COVID-19 patients collected by German CAPNETZ and PROGRESS study groups between 2020 and 2021. Troponin T high-sensitive (TnT-hs), procalcitonin (PCT), N-terminal pro brain natriuretic peptide, angiopoietin-2, copeptin, endothelin-1 (ET-1) and lipocalin-2 were measured at enrolment and related to 28d mortality/ICU admission endpoint. Logistic and relaxed LASSO regression were used to evaluate the added value of biomarkers compared to the CRB-65 score and to develop a combined risk prediction model for our endpoint.

Results: Of the 426 COVID-19 patients, 64 (15%) reached the endpoint. Among individual biomarkers, ET-1 showed the highest predictive performance (AUC = 0.76, 95% CI: 0.70-0.82). CRB-65 alone had an AUC of 0.63 (95% CI: 0.56-0.70). Our machine learning method identified CRB-65 + ET-1 to be optimal for prediction performance and model sparsity (AUC = 0.77, 95% CI: 0.71-0.83). Decision curve analysis demonstrated its greater net benefit over CRB-65 across large range of risk thresholds. The generalizability of our non-COVID CAP model (CRB-65 + TnT-hs + PCT) to COVID-19 patients was also assessed, yielding an AUC of 0.67 (95% CI: 0.60-0.74) for our primary endpoint. For 28d mortality alone as endpoint, it performed remarkably well (AUC = 0.90, 95% CI: 0.85-0.95).

Conclusion: Combining the already established clinical CRB-65 score with ET-1 significantly improves risk prediction of intensive care requirement or death within 28 days in hospitalized COVID-19 patients.

内皮素-1联合CRB-65可增强COVID-19患者的风险分层。
背景:COVID-19持续导致严重的疾病状况和大量死亡率。我们评估易于获取的生物标志物是否可以改善严重疾病结局的风险预测。方法:本研究分析了德国CAPNETZ和PROGRESS研究组在2020年至2021年间收集的426例COVID-19患者。在入组时测定肌钙蛋白T高敏(TnT-hs)、降钙素原(PCT)、n端脑利钠肽前体、血管生成素-2、copeptin、内皮素-1 (ET-1)和脂钙素-2,并与28d死亡率/ICU入院终点相关。使用Logistic和松弛LASSO回归来评估生物标志物与CRB-65评分的附加价值,并为我们的终点建立一个联合风险预测模型。结果:426例COVID-19患者中,64例(15%)达到终点。在个体生物标志物中,ET-1表现出最高的预测性能(AUC = 0.76, 95% CI: 0.70-0.82)。单独CRB-65的AUC为0.63 (95% CI: 0.56-0.70)。我们的机器学习方法确定CRB-65 + ET-1在预测性能和模型稀疏性方面是最佳的(AUC = 0.77, 95% CI: 0.71-0.83)。决策曲线分析表明,在大范围的风险阈值范围内,其净收益高于CRB-65。我们还评估了非COVID-19 CAP模型(CRB-65 + nt -hs + PCT)对COVID-19患者的泛化性,主要终点的AUC为0.67 (95% CI: 0.60-0.74)。仅以28d死亡率为终点,其表现非常好(AUC = 0.90, 95% CI: 0.85-0.95)。结论:将已建立的临床CRB-65评分与ET-1相结合,可显著提高COVID-19住院患者重症监护需求或28天内死亡的风险预测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Infection
Infection 医学-传染病学
CiteScore
12.50
自引率
1.30%
发文量
224
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Infection is a journal dedicated to serving as a global forum for the presentation and discussion of clinically relevant information on infectious diseases. Its primary goal is to engage readers and contributors from various regions around the world in the exchange of knowledge about the etiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment of infectious diseases, both in outpatient and inpatient settings. The journal covers a wide range of topics, including: Etiology: The study of the causes of infectious diseases. Pathogenesis: The process by which an infectious agent causes disease. Diagnosis: The methods and techniques used to identify infectious diseases. Treatment: The medical interventions and strategies employed to treat infectious diseases. Public Health: Issues of local, regional, or international significance related to infectious diseases, including prevention, control, and management strategies. Hospital Epidemiology: The study of the spread of infectious diseases within healthcare settings and the measures to prevent nosocomial infections. In addition to these, Infection also includes a specialized "Images" section, which focuses on high-quality visual content, such as images, photographs, and microscopic slides, accompanied by brief abstracts. This section is designed to highlight the clinical and diagnostic value of visual aids in the field of infectious diseases, as many conditions present with characteristic clinical signs that can be diagnosed through inspection, and imaging and microscopy are crucial for accurate diagnosis. The journal's comprehensive approach ensures that it remains a valuable resource for healthcare professionals and researchers in the field of infectious diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信