Influence of a Bis-GMA-free universal adhesive system on enamel bond strength to ceramic brackets.

Q3 Medicine
General dentistry Pub Date : 2025-09-01
Aline Júnia Oliveira, Victor Angelo Martins Montalli, Jurandir Antonio Barbosa, Roberta Tarkany Basting
{"title":"Influence of a Bis-GMA-free universal adhesive system on enamel bond strength to ceramic brackets.","authors":"Aline Júnia Oliveira, Victor Angelo Martins Montalli, Jurandir Antonio Barbosa, Roberta Tarkany Basting","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this study was to evaluate the shear bond strength and Adhesive Remnant Index (ARI) of ceramic brackets bonded to enamel using a universal adhesive system free of bisphenol A glycidyl methacrylate (Bis-GMA). A total of 100 bovine incisors were divided into 2 groups (n = 50) that received ceramic brackets (Morelli Ceramic or Ice Clear) bonded after acid etching and application of 1 of 5 adhesive systems (n = 10): Adper Single Bond 2, a conventional adhesive system (control group); Scotchbond Universal Plus, a Bis-GMA-free universal adhesive system; and Single Bond Universal, BeautiBond Xtreme, and BeautiOrtho Bond II, all Bis-GMA-containing universal adhesives. Shear bond strength was tested in a universal testing machine (50-kgf load cell; 0.5 mm/min crosshead speed), and the ARI was analyzed under ×20 magnification. Statistical analysis included a generalized linear model with Fisher exact test, Kruskal-Wallis test with post hoc Dunn test, and Mann-Whitney U test; the significance level was set at 5%. No statistically significant differences in shear bond strength were observed among the adhesive systems (P = 0.7821) or their interactions with bracket type (P = 0.5449). A significant difference was found when bracket types were compared (P < 0.0001), with the Morelli Ceramic bracket groups showing the highest bond strengths regardless of the adhesive system used. A significant association between adhesives and the Morelli Ceramic bracket was observed for the ARI score (P = 0.0018), with 100% of specimens in the Scotchbond Universal Plus adhesive group retaining more than half of the resin on the tooth. The Bis-GMA-free universal adhesive system achieved the highest percentage of adhesive retention on the tooth for both bracket types.</p>","PeriodicalId":12571,"journal":{"name":"General dentistry","volume":"73 5","pages":"42-47"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"General dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the shear bond strength and Adhesive Remnant Index (ARI) of ceramic brackets bonded to enamel using a universal adhesive system free of bisphenol A glycidyl methacrylate (Bis-GMA). A total of 100 bovine incisors were divided into 2 groups (n = 50) that received ceramic brackets (Morelli Ceramic or Ice Clear) bonded after acid etching and application of 1 of 5 adhesive systems (n = 10): Adper Single Bond 2, a conventional adhesive system (control group); Scotchbond Universal Plus, a Bis-GMA-free universal adhesive system; and Single Bond Universal, BeautiBond Xtreme, and BeautiOrtho Bond II, all Bis-GMA-containing universal adhesives. Shear bond strength was tested in a universal testing machine (50-kgf load cell; 0.5 mm/min crosshead speed), and the ARI was analyzed under ×20 magnification. Statistical analysis included a generalized linear model with Fisher exact test, Kruskal-Wallis test with post hoc Dunn test, and Mann-Whitney U test; the significance level was set at 5%. No statistically significant differences in shear bond strength were observed among the adhesive systems (P = 0.7821) or their interactions with bracket type (P = 0.5449). A significant difference was found when bracket types were compared (P < 0.0001), with the Morelli Ceramic bracket groups showing the highest bond strengths regardless of the adhesive system used. A significant association between adhesives and the Morelli Ceramic bracket was observed for the ARI score (P = 0.0018), with 100% of specimens in the Scotchbond Universal Plus adhesive group retaining more than half of the resin on the tooth. The Bis-GMA-free universal adhesive system achieved the highest percentage of adhesive retention on the tooth for both bracket types.

不含bis - gma的万能胶粘剂体系对陶瓷托架搪瓷粘结强度的影响。
采用不含双酚a甲基丙烯酸缩水甘油酯(Bis-GMA)的通用胶粘剂体系,研究了陶瓷托槽与牙釉质的剪切结合强度和粘接残余指数(ARI)。将100只牛门牙分为两组(n = 50),分别采用酸蚀后粘结的陶瓷托槽(Morelli ceramic或Ice Clear),并应用5种粘结体系中的1种(n = 10):常规粘结体系Adper Single Bond 2(对照组);Scotchbond Universal Plus,一种不含bis - gma的通用粘合剂系统;和Single Bond Universal, BeautiBond Xtreme和BeautiOrtho Bond II,所有含有bis - gma的通用粘合剂。在万能试验机(50-kgf测压元件,0.5 mm/min横头速度)上测试剪切粘结强度,并在×20放大下分析ARI。统计分析采用广义线性模型Fisher精确检验、Kruskal-Wallis检验、事后Dunn检验和Mann-Whitney U检验;显著性水平设为5%。粘接系统之间的剪切粘接强度差异无统计学意义(P = 0.7821),其与支架类型的相互作用差异无统计学意义(P = 0.5449)。当托架类型进行比较时发现显著差异(P < 0.0001),无论使用何种粘合剂系统,Morelli陶瓷托架组都显示出最高的粘合强度。粘接剂和Morelli陶瓷支架之间的ARI评分显著相关(P = 0.0018), 100%的Scotchbond Universal Plus粘接剂组的标本保留了牙齿上一半以上的树脂。Bis-GMA-free通用粘合剂系统在两种托架类型的牙齿上实现了最高百分比的粘合剂保留。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
General dentistry
General dentistry Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
134
期刊介绍: General Dentistry is the premier peer-reviewed journal of the Academy of General Dentistry (AGD). Published bi-monthly, General Dentistry presents research and clinical findings to support the full range of procedures that general dentists perform on a regular basis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信