Aline Júnia Oliveira, Victor Angelo Martins Montalli, Jurandir Antonio Barbosa, Roberta Tarkany Basting
{"title":"Influence of a Bis-GMA-free universal adhesive system on enamel bond strength to ceramic brackets.","authors":"Aline Júnia Oliveira, Victor Angelo Martins Montalli, Jurandir Antonio Barbosa, Roberta Tarkany Basting","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this study was to evaluate the shear bond strength and Adhesive Remnant Index (ARI) of ceramic brackets bonded to enamel using a universal adhesive system free of bisphenol A glycidyl methacrylate (Bis-GMA). A total of 100 bovine incisors were divided into 2 groups (n = 50) that received ceramic brackets (Morelli Ceramic or Ice Clear) bonded after acid etching and application of 1 of 5 adhesive systems (n = 10): Adper Single Bond 2, a conventional adhesive system (control group); Scotchbond Universal Plus, a Bis-GMA-free universal adhesive system; and Single Bond Universal, BeautiBond Xtreme, and BeautiOrtho Bond II, all Bis-GMA-containing universal adhesives. Shear bond strength was tested in a universal testing machine (50-kgf load cell; 0.5 mm/min crosshead speed), and the ARI was analyzed under ×20 magnification. Statistical analysis included a generalized linear model with Fisher exact test, Kruskal-Wallis test with post hoc Dunn test, and Mann-Whitney U test; the significance level was set at 5%. No statistically significant differences in shear bond strength were observed among the adhesive systems (P = 0.7821) or their interactions with bracket type (P = 0.5449). A significant difference was found when bracket types were compared (P < 0.0001), with the Morelli Ceramic bracket groups showing the highest bond strengths regardless of the adhesive system used. A significant association between adhesives and the Morelli Ceramic bracket was observed for the ARI score (P = 0.0018), with 100% of specimens in the Scotchbond Universal Plus adhesive group retaining more than half of the resin on the tooth. The Bis-GMA-free universal adhesive system achieved the highest percentage of adhesive retention on the tooth for both bracket types.</p>","PeriodicalId":12571,"journal":{"name":"General dentistry","volume":"73 5","pages":"42-47"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"General dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate the shear bond strength and Adhesive Remnant Index (ARI) of ceramic brackets bonded to enamel using a universal adhesive system free of bisphenol A glycidyl methacrylate (Bis-GMA). A total of 100 bovine incisors were divided into 2 groups (n = 50) that received ceramic brackets (Morelli Ceramic or Ice Clear) bonded after acid etching and application of 1 of 5 adhesive systems (n = 10): Adper Single Bond 2, a conventional adhesive system (control group); Scotchbond Universal Plus, a Bis-GMA-free universal adhesive system; and Single Bond Universal, BeautiBond Xtreme, and BeautiOrtho Bond II, all Bis-GMA-containing universal adhesives. Shear bond strength was tested in a universal testing machine (50-kgf load cell; 0.5 mm/min crosshead speed), and the ARI was analyzed under ×20 magnification. Statistical analysis included a generalized linear model with Fisher exact test, Kruskal-Wallis test with post hoc Dunn test, and Mann-Whitney U test; the significance level was set at 5%. No statistically significant differences in shear bond strength were observed among the adhesive systems (P = 0.7821) or their interactions with bracket type (P = 0.5449). A significant difference was found when bracket types were compared (P < 0.0001), with the Morelli Ceramic bracket groups showing the highest bond strengths regardless of the adhesive system used. A significant association between adhesives and the Morelli Ceramic bracket was observed for the ARI score (P = 0.0018), with 100% of specimens in the Scotchbond Universal Plus adhesive group retaining more than half of the resin on the tooth. The Bis-GMA-free universal adhesive system achieved the highest percentage of adhesive retention on the tooth for both bracket types.
期刊介绍:
General Dentistry is the premier peer-reviewed journal of the Academy of General Dentistry (AGD). Published bi-monthly, General Dentistry presents research and clinical findings to support the full range of procedures that general dentists perform on a regular basis.