Marital Bargaining and Assortative Mating on Fertility Preference : Evidence based on Cross-sectional Data in China.

Q2 Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
F1000Research Pub Date : 2025-07-30 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.12688/f1000research.151196.4
Meiyi Zhuang, Hisahiro Naito
{"title":"Marital Bargaining and Assortative Mating on Fertility Preference : Evidence based on Cross-sectional Data in China.","authors":"Meiyi Zhuang, Hisahiro Naito","doi":"10.12688/f1000research.151196.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Behaviors regarding child-bearing are among the most consequential ones within families, as child-rearing necessitates the active involvement of both partners. This dynamic suggests that individuals may seek partners with similar fertility preferences, leading to assortative mating based on these shared preferences.</p><p><strong>Data and methods: </strong>This study investigates second-child fertility outcomes using data from the 2018 China Family Panel Studies and applies the Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) regression. Furthermore, it examines assortative matching based on fertility preferences, utilizing the 2020 provincial-level sex ratio for individuals aged 20-39 as a proxy for women's bargaining power in the marriage market.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results, based on a sample of 2,351 household-level observations, indicate that spouses' preferences are complementary. When a husband (or wife) desires a second child, their own preference has a stronger impact on the actual outcome to have of having a second child if their partner also expresses the same desire. Additionally, the findings reveal evidence of assortative mating in terms of preferences for the desired number of children. Moreover, in provinces with higher male-to-female sex ratios-indicating stronger bargaining power for women-a wife's preference is more strongly aligned with her husband's preference. For men, however, a husband's preference aligns with his wife's preference regardless of the sex ratio, suggesting that men's bargaining power in the marriage market is relatively weak.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings have two key implications. First, shared fertility preferences between spouses show a complementary effect, increasing the likelihood of having a second child. Second, marriage matching is not random, as individuals are more likely to partner with those who share similar fertility preferences. Additionally, women with greater bargaining power are positively associated with their husbands' desired family size.</p>","PeriodicalId":12260,"journal":{"name":"F1000Research","volume":"13 ","pages":"659"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12351236/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"F1000Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.151196.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Behaviors regarding child-bearing are among the most consequential ones within families, as child-rearing necessitates the active involvement of both partners. This dynamic suggests that individuals may seek partners with similar fertility preferences, leading to assortative mating based on these shared preferences.

Data and methods: This study investigates second-child fertility outcomes using data from the 2018 China Family Panel Studies and applies the Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) regression. Furthermore, it examines assortative matching based on fertility preferences, utilizing the 2020 provincial-level sex ratio for individuals aged 20-39 as a proxy for women's bargaining power in the marriage market.

Results: The results, based on a sample of 2,351 household-level observations, indicate that spouses' preferences are complementary. When a husband (or wife) desires a second child, their own preference has a stronger impact on the actual outcome to have of having a second child if their partner also expresses the same desire. Additionally, the findings reveal evidence of assortative mating in terms of preferences for the desired number of children. Moreover, in provinces with higher male-to-female sex ratios-indicating stronger bargaining power for women-a wife's preference is more strongly aligned with her husband's preference. For men, however, a husband's preference aligns with his wife's preference regardless of the sex ratio, suggesting that men's bargaining power in the marriage market is relatively weak.

Conclusions: The findings have two key implications. First, shared fertility preferences between spouses show a complementary effect, increasing the likelihood of having a second child. Second, marriage matching is not random, as individuals are more likely to partner with those who share similar fertility preferences. Additionally, women with greater bargaining power are positively associated with their husbands' desired family size.

婚姻讨价还价和选择性交配对生育偏好的影响:基于中国横断面数据的证据。
背景:关于生育的行为是家庭中最重要的行为之一,因为养育孩子需要双方的积极参与。这种动态表明,个体可能会寻找具有相似生育偏好的伴侣,从而导致基于这些共同偏好的分类交配。数据与方法:本研究使用2018年中国家庭面板研究数据,采用普通最小二乘(OLS)回归对二孩生育结果进行了调查。此外,它还研究了基于生育偏好的分类匹配,利用2020年省级20-39岁个人的性别比例作为女性在婚姻市场上议价能力的代表。结果:基于2351个家庭层面观察样本的结果表明,配偶的偏好是互补的。当丈夫(或妻子)想要第二个孩子时,如果他们的伴侣也表达了同样的愿望,他们自己的偏好对生第二个孩子的实际结果有更大的影响。此外,研究结果还揭示了选择性交配在孩子数量偏好方面的证据。此外,在男女比例较高的省份(这表明女性的议价能力更强),妻子的偏好与丈夫的偏好更为一致。然而,对于男性来说,无论男女比例如何,丈夫的偏好都会与妻子的偏好保持一致,这表明男性在婚姻市场上的议价能力相对较弱。结论:研究结果有两个关键含义。首先,配偶之间共同的生育偏好显示出互补效应,增加了生第二个孩子的可能性。其次,婚姻匹配不是随机的,因为个人更有可能与那些有相似生育偏好的人结婚。此外,议价能力更强的女性与丈夫期望的家庭规模呈正相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
F1000Research
F1000Research Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics (all)
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1646
审稿时长
1 weeks
期刊介绍: F1000Research publishes articles and other research outputs reporting basic scientific, scholarly, translational and clinical research across the physical and life sciences, engineering, medicine, social sciences and humanities. F1000Research is a scholarly publication platform set up for the scientific, scholarly and medical research community; each article has at least one author who is a qualified researcher, scholar or clinician actively working in their speciality and who has made a key contribution to the article. Articles must be original (not duplications). All research is suitable irrespective of the perceived level of interest or novelty; we welcome confirmatory and negative results, as well as null studies. F1000Research publishes different type of research, including clinical trials, systematic reviews, software tools, method articles, and many others. Reviews and Opinion articles providing a balanced and comprehensive overview of the latest discoveries in a particular field, or presenting a personal perspective on recent developments, are also welcome. See the full list of article types we accept for more information.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信