Explore the Traces of Homunculus - Investigating the Effect of the Compound Retrieval Strategy on Switch Positivity.

IF 1.3 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Fangyuan Zhou, Zhongjin Tian, Xianqian Li
{"title":"Explore the Traces of Homunculus - Investigating the Effect of the Compound Retrieval Strategy on Switch Positivity.","authors":"Fangyuan Zhou, Zhongjin Tian, Xianqian Li","doi":"10.1027/1618-3169/a000649","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b></b> Previous task-switching research typically assumed that event-related potentials related to task switching, such as the target-locked switch positivity difference wave (SPDW), were indicators of cognitive control during task-set control. This study challenges that assumption. In two conventional numeric task-switching experiments (odd-even and low-high tasks), unknown symbols represented common Arabic numerals. Participants in the compound retrieval groups were unaware of the symbols' semantic meanings and relied solely on associative learning-based retrieval strategies, whereas those in the task rule groups understood the symbols and used standard task rules requiring cognitive control. Experiment 1 revealed that behavioral task-switching costs were significant only in the task rule group and completely disappeared in the compound retrieval group. However, both groups exhibited reliable SPDW without any between-group differences. Experiment 2 employed a dual-cue design to distinguish between cue-switching and task-switching. The results showed reliable cue-switch-related SPDW, while task-switch-related SPDW was not significant and showed no differences between the compound retrieval and task rule groups. Overall, there was no evidence to suggest that SPDW is a reliable marker of cognitive control. The study concluded that even if cognitive control can induce SPDW, using SPDW to represent cognitive control might not be the most appropriate approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":12173,"journal":{"name":"Experimental psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experimental psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000649","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Previous task-switching research typically assumed that event-related potentials related to task switching, such as the target-locked switch positivity difference wave (SPDW), were indicators of cognitive control during task-set control. This study challenges that assumption. In two conventional numeric task-switching experiments (odd-even and low-high tasks), unknown symbols represented common Arabic numerals. Participants in the compound retrieval groups were unaware of the symbols' semantic meanings and relied solely on associative learning-based retrieval strategies, whereas those in the task rule groups understood the symbols and used standard task rules requiring cognitive control. Experiment 1 revealed that behavioral task-switching costs were significant only in the task rule group and completely disappeared in the compound retrieval group. However, both groups exhibited reliable SPDW without any between-group differences. Experiment 2 employed a dual-cue design to distinguish between cue-switching and task-switching. The results showed reliable cue-switch-related SPDW, while task-switch-related SPDW was not significant and showed no differences between the compound retrieval and task rule groups. Overall, there was no evidence to suggest that SPDW is a reliable marker of cognitive control. The study concluded that even if cognitive control can induce SPDW, using SPDW to represent cognitive control might not be the most appropriate approach.

探索小矮人的踪迹——探究复合检索策略对开关积极性的影响。
以往的任务切换研究通常假设与任务切换相关的事件相关电位,如目标锁定开关正性差波(SPDW),是任务集控制过程中认知控制的指标。这项研究挑战了这一假设。在两个传统的数字任务切换实验(奇偶任务和高低任务)中,未知符号代表常见的阿拉伯数字。复合检索组的参与者不知道符号的语义,仅依赖于基于联想学习的检索策略,而任务规则组的参与者理解符号并使用需要认知控制的标准任务规则。实验1显示,行为任务转换成本仅在任务规则组显著,在复合检索组完全消失。然而,两组均表现出可靠的SPDW,没有组间差异。实验2采用双线索设计来区分提示切换和任务切换。结果显示线索转换相关的SPDW是可靠的,而任务转换相关的SPDW不显著,在复合检索组和任务规则组之间没有差异。总的来说,没有证据表明SPDW是认知控制的可靠标志。研究表明,即使认知控制可以诱发SPDW,但用SPDW来代表认知控制可能不是最合适的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Experimental psychology
Experimental psychology PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
7.70%
发文量
18
期刊介绍: As its name implies, Experimental Psychology (ISSN 1618-3169) publishes innovative, original, high-quality experimental research in psychology — quickly! It aims to provide a particularly fast outlet for such research, relying heavily on electronic exchange of information which begins with the electronic submission of manuscripts, and continues throughout the entire review and production process. The scope of the journal is defined by the experimental method, and so papers based on experiments from all areas of psychology are published. In addition to research articles, Experimental Psychology includes occasional theoretical and review articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信