The cost-effectiveness of toripalimab combined with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone in the first-line treatment of extensive-stage small cell lung cancer in China: the perspective of the medical and health system based on the EXTENTORCH study.
{"title":"The cost-effectiveness of toripalimab combined with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone in the first-line treatment of extensive-stage small cell lung cancer in China: the perspective of the medical and health system based on the EXTENTORCH study.","authors":"Xueying Jin, Shengkai Zhao, Zekai Zhao, Jianguo Zhao","doi":"10.1080/14737140.2025.2549007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of toripalimab combined with chemotherapy for the first-line treatment of extensive-stage small cell lung cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A partitioned survival model was employed with data sourced from the EXTENTORCH clinical trial and related literature. The simulation period was set to 10 years, with a cycle of 3 weeks, and all cost and utility indicators were adjusted using a 5% annual discount rate. Using QALYs as the main evaluation indicator, ICERs were calculated to compare the economic differences between treatment with TC group and PC group. The reliability of the research results was verified through single-factor sensitivity analysis and probabilistic sensitivity analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From the base analysis indicate that the ICER for the TC group relative to the PC group is $3,151 per QALY, which is significantly lower than the WTP set at three times the 2024 per capita GDP of China. Sensitivity analysis shows that the discount rate, incidence of hematotoxicity in TC group, number of treatment cycles and other parameters have the greatest impact on ICER.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>At the current willingness-to-pay threshold for Chinese patients, the combination of toripalimab and chemotherapy demonstrates superior cost-effectiveness compared to traditional chemotherapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":12099,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14737140.2025.2549007","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of toripalimab combined with chemotherapy for the first-line treatment of extensive-stage small cell lung cancer.
Methods: A partitioned survival model was employed with data sourced from the EXTENTORCH clinical trial and related literature. The simulation period was set to 10 years, with a cycle of 3 weeks, and all cost and utility indicators were adjusted using a 5% annual discount rate. Using QALYs as the main evaluation indicator, ICERs were calculated to compare the economic differences between treatment with TC group and PC group. The reliability of the research results was verified through single-factor sensitivity analysis and probabilistic sensitivity analysis.
Results: From the base analysis indicate that the ICER for the TC group relative to the PC group is $3,151 per QALY, which is significantly lower than the WTP set at three times the 2024 per capita GDP of China. Sensitivity analysis shows that the discount rate, incidence of hematotoxicity in TC group, number of treatment cycles and other parameters have the greatest impact on ICER.
Conclusion: At the current willingness-to-pay threshold for Chinese patients, the combination of toripalimab and chemotherapy demonstrates superior cost-effectiveness compared to traditional chemotherapy.
期刊介绍:
Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy (ISSN 1473-7140) provides expert appraisal and commentary on the major trends in cancer care and highlights the performance of new therapeutic and diagnostic approaches.
Coverage includes tumor management, novel medicines, anticancer agents and chemotherapy, biological therapy, cancer vaccines, therapeutic indications, biomarkers and diagnostics, and treatment guidelines. All articles are subject to rigorous peer-review, and the journal makes an essential contribution to decision-making in cancer care.
Comprehensive coverage in each review is complemented by the unique Expert Review format and includes the following sections:
Expert Opinion - a personal view of the data presented in the article, a discussion on the developments that are likely to be important in the future, and the avenues of research likely to become exciting as further studies yield more detailed results
Article Highlights – an executive summary of the author’s most critical points.