The cost-effectiveness of toripalimab combined with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone in the first-line treatment of extensive-stage small cell lung cancer in China: the perspective of the medical and health system based on the EXTENTORCH study.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Xueying Jin, Shengkai Zhao, Zekai Zhao, Jianguo Zhao
{"title":"The cost-effectiveness of toripalimab combined with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone in the first-line treatment of extensive-stage small cell lung cancer in China: the perspective of the medical and health system based on the EXTENTORCH study.","authors":"Xueying Jin, Shengkai Zhao, Zekai Zhao, Jianguo Zhao","doi":"10.1080/14737140.2025.2549007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of toripalimab combined with chemotherapy for the first-line treatment of extensive-stage small cell lung cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A partitioned survival model was employed with data sourced from the EXTENTORCH clinical trial and related literature. The simulation period was set to 10 years, with a cycle of 3 weeks, and all cost and utility indicators were adjusted using a 5% annual discount rate. Using QALYs as the main evaluation indicator, ICERs were calculated to compare the economic differences between treatment with TC group and PC group. The reliability of the research results was verified through single-factor sensitivity analysis and probabilistic sensitivity analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From the base analysis indicate that the ICER for the TC group relative to the PC group is $3,151 per QALY, which is significantly lower than the WTP set at three times the 2024 per capita GDP of China. Sensitivity analysis shows that the discount rate, incidence of hematotoxicity in TC group, number of treatment cycles and other parameters have the greatest impact on ICER.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>At the current willingness-to-pay threshold for Chinese patients, the combination of toripalimab and chemotherapy demonstrates superior cost-effectiveness compared to traditional chemotherapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":12099,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14737140.2025.2549007","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of toripalimab combined with chemotherapy for the first-line treatment of extensive-stage small cell lung cancer.

Methods: A partitioned survival model was employed with data sourced from the EXTENTORCH clinical trial and related literature. The simulation period was set to 10 years, with a cycle of 3 weeks, and all cost and utility indicators were adjusted using a 5% annual discount rate. Using QALYs as the main evaluation indicator, ICERs were calculated to compare the economic differences between treatment with TC group and PC group. The reliability of the research results was verified through single-factor sensitivity analysis and probabilistic sensitivity analysis.

Results: From the base analysis indicate that the ICER for the TC group relative to the PC group is $3,151 per QALY, which is significantly lower than the WTP set at three times the 2024 per capita GDP of China. Sensitivity analysis shows that the discount rate, incidence of hematotoxicity in TC group, number of treatment cycles and other parameters have the greatest impact on ICER.

Conclusion: At the current willingness-to-pay threshold for Chinese patients, the combination of toripalimab and chemotherapy demonstrates superior cost-effectiveness compared to traditional chemotherapy.

托利哌单抗联合化疗与单独化疗一线治疗中国广泛期小细胞肺癌的成本-效果分析:基于EXTENTORCH研究的医疗卫生系统视角
目的:评价托帕利单抗联合化疗一线治疗广泛期小细胞肺癌的成本-效果。方法:采用分区生存模型,数据来源于EXTENTORCH临床试验和相关文献。模拟周期设置为10年,周期为3周,所有成本和效用指标均采用5%的年贴现率进行调整。以QALYs为主要评价指标,计算ICERs,比较TC组与PC组治疗的经济性差异。通过单因素敏感性分析和概率敏感性分析验证了研究结果的可靠性。结果:从基数分析来看,TC组相对于PC组的ICER为3151美元/ QALY,显著低于按2024年中国人均GDP的3倍设定的WTP。敏感性分析显示,TC组的贴现率、血液毒性发生率、治疗周期数等参数对ICER影响最大。结论:在目前中国患者的支付意愿阈值下,与传统化疗相比,托利帕单抗联合化疗具有更高的成本-效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.00%
发文量
100
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy (ISSN 1473-7140) provides expert appraisal and commentary on the major trends in cancer care and highlights the performance of new therapeutic and diagnostic approaches. Coverage includes tumor management, novel medicines, anticancer agents and chemotherapy, biological therapy, cancer vaccines, therapeutic indications, biomarkers and diagnostics, and treatment guidelines. All articles are subject to rigorous peer-review, and the journal makes an essential contribution to decision-making in cancer care. Comprehensive coverage in each review is complemented by the unique Expert Review format and includes the following sections: Expert Opinion - a personal view of the data presented in the article, a discussion on the developments that are likely to be important in the future, and the avenues of research likely to become exciting as further studies yield more detailed results Article Highlights – an executive summary of the author’s most critical points.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信