Nutrient quality, environmental impact, and cost of Chinese diets: a benchmarking optimization approach.

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q2 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Zhiyao Chang, Elise F Talsma, Hongyi Cai, Shenggen Fan, Yuanying Ni, Xin Wen, Pieter Van' T Veer, Sander Biesbroek
{"title":"Nutrient quality, environmental impact, and cost of Chinese diets: a benchmarking optimization approach.","authors":"Zhiyao Chang, Elise F Talsma, Hongyi Cai, Shenggen Fan, Yuanying Ni, Xin Wen, Pieter Van' T Veer, Sander Biesbroek","doi":"10.1007/s00394-025-03775-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Design Chinese diets that are more nutritious, and have lower environmental footprints and cost, while accounting for diet preference.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Food consumption data of 4889 men and 5435 women adults were collected via 3-d 24-h dietary recalls in five regional subgroups (Metropolitan cities, Northeast, East, Southwest, and Central region) covered by the China Health and Nutrition Survey 2011. Data envelopment analysis (DEA) model was applied to benchmark diets that had higher adherence to food-based dietary guidelines. Optimized diets were obtained by combining benchmarked diets in the studied population that complied with different sustainability goals: maximized nutrient quality (Nutrient Rich Diet score, NRD15.3), minimized greenhouse gas emissions (GHGE), minimized diet cost, maximized diet preference, and an integrated scenario. Furthermore, trade-offs between sustainability indicators were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>When nutrient quality, environmental impacts, and diet cost were optimized within each regional subgroup, the NRD15.3 increased 22-35%, GHGE decreased 17-38%, total water use (TWU) decreased 14-35%, land use (LU) decreased 21-33%, and diet costs decreased 23-32% compared to observed diets. When optimizing diet preference, more than 90% of food consumption remained similar as observed diets. When the four objectives were considered simultaneously, all indicators improved ~ 20%. In trade-off analyses, higher nutrient quality was accompanied by increased environmental impacts and diet cost.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Diet improvement towards more nutritious, environmentally sustainable, affordable, and culturally acceptable is feasible in China. During the transition of the food system, iterative applications of the DEA model to changed dietary habits can inform policymakers to finetune diet recommendations towards sustainability.</p>","PeriodicalId":12030,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Nutrition","volume":"64 6","pages":"261"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00394-025-03775-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Design Chinese diets that are more nutritious, and have lower environmental footprints and cost, while accounting for diet preference.

Methods: Food consumption data of 4889 men and 5435 women adults were collected via 3-d 24-h dietary recalls in five regional subgroups (Metropolitan cities, Northeast, East, Southwest, and Central region) covered by the China Health and Nutrition Survey 2011. Data envelopment analysis (DEA) model was applied to benchmark diets that had higher adherence to food-based dietary guidelines. Optimized diets were obtained by combining benchmarked diets in the studied population that complied with different sustainability goals: maximized nutrient quality (Nutrient Rich Diet score, NRD15.3), minimized greenhouse gas emissions (GHGE), minimized diet cost, maximized diet preference, and an integrated scenario. Furthermore, trade-offs between sustainability indicators were assessed.

Results: When nutrient quality, environmental impacts, and diet cost were optimized within each regional subgroup, the NRD15.3 increased 22-35%, GHGE decreased 17-38%, total water use (TWU) decreased 14-35%, land use (LU) decreased 21-33%, and diet costs decreased 23-32% compared to observed diets. When optimizing diet preference, more than 90% of food consumption remained similar as observed diets. When the four objectives were considered simultaneously, all indicators improved ~ 20%. In trade-off analyses, higher nutrient quality was accompanied by increased environmental impacts and diet cost.

Conclusion: Diet improvement towards more nutritious, environmentally sustainable, affordable, and culturally acceptable is feasible in China. During the transition of the food system, iterative applications of the DEA model to changed dietary habits can inform policymakers to finetune diet recommendations towards sustainability.

中国膳食的营养质量、环境影响和成本:标杆优化方法。
目的:在考虑饮食偏好的情况下,设计更有营养、更低环境足迹和成本的中国饮食。方法:通过《2011年中国健康与营养调查》覆盖的5个区域亚组(大城市、东北、东部、西南和中部地区)的3-d 24小时膳食回顾,收集4889名男性和5435名女性成年人的食品消费数据。数据包络分析(DEA)模型应用于对基于食物的饮食指南有较高依从性的基准饮食。通过组合符合不同可持续性目标的研究人群基准饮食,获得优化饮食:最大营养质量(营养丰富饮食评分,NRD15.3),最小温室气体排放(GHGE),最小饮食成本,最大饮食偏好和综合方案。此外,还评估了可持续性指标之间的权衡。结果:在各区域亚组内进行营养质量、环境影响和日粮成本优化后,与观察日粮相比,NRD15.3提高了22-35%,GHGE降低了17-38%,总水分利用(TWU)降低了14-35%,土地利用(LU)降低了21-33%,日粮成本降低了23-32%。当优化饮食偏好时,超过90%的食物消耗与观察到的饮食相似。当四个目标同时考虑时,所有指标都提高了约20%。在权衡分析中,更高的营养质量伴随着更高的环境影响和饮食成本。结论:在中国,向更有营养、环境可持续、经济实惠和文化可接受的方向改善饮食是可行的。在粮食系统转型期间,将DEA模型反复应用于改变的饮食习惯,可以为政策制定者提供信息,以调整饮食建议,以实现可持续性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.20
自引率
2.00%
发文量
295
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Nutrition publishes original papers, reviews, and short communications in the nutritional sciences. The manuscripts submitted to the European Journal of Nutrition should have their major focus on the impact of nutrients and non-nutrients on immunology and inflammation, gene expression, metabolism, chronic diseases, or carcinogenesis, or a major focus on epidemiology, including intervention studies with healthy subjects and with patients, biofunctionality of food and food components, or the impact of diet on the environment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信