Efficacy and safety of percutaneous thermal ablation in Bosniak III and IV cystic renal masses: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Hans-Jonas Meyer, Timo Christian Meine, Manuel Florian Struck, Silke Zimmermann
{"title":"Efficacy and safety of percutaneous thermal ablation in Bosniak III and IV cystic renal masses: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Hans-Jonas Meyer, Timo Christian Meine, Manuel Florian Struck, Silke Zimmermann","doi":"10.4274/dir.2025.253263","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Local thermal ablation is considered a standard treatment for small kidney masses. However, few studies have investigated the efficacy and safety of thermal ablation for cystic kidney masses.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The MEDLINE library, Cochrane, and SCOPUS databases were screened for studies investigating the efficacy of thermal ablation for cystic renal masses, comprising studies between 1995 and February 2024. In total, seven studies were deemed suitable and included in the present analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The studies included a total of 113 participants with 134 cystic renal masses. The sample sizes ranged from 5 to 38 participants. There were 76 men (67.2%) and 37 women (32.8%), with a mean age of 64.7 years (range: 50 to 75.4 years). Overall, 55 cystic masses were classified as Bosniak III (41%) and 79 as Bosniak IV (59%). Technical success of local thermal ablation was reported in 133 cystic masses (99.2%). The pooled meta-analytic technical success rate was 100% [95% confidence interval (CI): 96%-100%, I<sup>2</sup> = 0.0%]. Complications were reported in 9 cases (6.7%). According to the Society of Interventional Radiology classification system, there were 3 major complications (2.6%) and 6 minor complications (5.3%). The pooled meta-analytic complication rate was 10% (95% CI: 5%-20%, I<sup>2</sup> = 40%). No tumor recurrence was reported during follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Local thermal ablation can be considered a highly effective and safe procedure for cystic kidney masses. Most studies were performed using radiofrequency ablation, underscoring the need for further studies on alternative ablation techniques such as microwave ablation and cryoablation.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>Local thermal ablation is an effective and safe procedure for treating cystic kidney masses.</p>","PeriodicalId":11341,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostic and interventional radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diagnostic and interventional radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4274/dir.2025.253263","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Local thermal ablation is considered a standard treatment for small kidney masses. However, few studies have investigated the efficacy and safety of thermal ablation for cystic kidney masses.

Methods: The MEDLINE library, Cochrane, and SCOPUS databases were screened for studies investigating the efficacy of thermal ablation for cystic renal masses, comprising studies between 1995 and February 2024. In total, seven studies were deemed suitable and included in the present analysis.

Results: The studies included a total of 113 participants with 134 cystic renal masses. The sample sizes ranged from 5 to 38 participants. There were 76 men (67.2%) and 37 women (32.8%), with a mean age of 64.7 years (range: 50 to 75.4 years). Overall, 55 cystic masses were classified as Bosniak III (41%) and 79 as Bosniak IV (59%). Technical success of local thermal ablation was reported in 133 cystic masses (99.2%). The pooled meta-analytic technical success rate was 100% [95% confidence interval (CI): 96%-100%, I2 = 0.0%]. Complications were reported in 9 cases (6.7%). According to the Society of Interventional Radiology classification system, there were 3 major complications (2.6%) and 6 minor complications (5.3%). The pooled meta-analytic complication rate was 10% (95% CI: 5%-20%, I2 = 40%). No tumor recurrence was reported during follow-up.

Conclusion: Local thermal ablation can be considered a highly effective and safe procedure for cystic kidney masses. Most studies were performed using radiofrequency ablation, underscoring the need for further studies on alternative ablation techniques such as microwave ablation and cryoablation.

Clinical significance: Local thermal ablation is an effective and safe procedure for treating cystic kidney masses.

经皮热消融治疗Bosniak型和IV型囊性肾肿块的疗效和安全性:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。
目的:局部热消融被认为是小肾肿块的标准治疗方法。然而,很少有研究探讨热消融治疗囊肾肿块的有效性和安全性。方法:从MEDLINE图书馆、Cochrane和SCOPUS数据库中筛选1995年至2024年2月期间研究热消融治疗囊性肾肿块疗效的研究。总共有七项研究被认为是合适的,并列入本分析。结果:研究共纳入113例参与者134例囊性肾肿块。样本量从5人到38人不等。男性76人(67.2%),女性37人(32.8%),平均年龄64.7岁(50 ~ 75.4岁)。总体而言,55例囊性肿块分为Bosniak III型(41%),79例分为Bosniak IV型(59%)。局部热消融技术成功治疗囊性肿块133例(99.2%)。综合meta分析技术成功率为100%[95%置信区间(CI): 96%-100%, I2 = 0.0%]。并发症9例(6.7%)。根据介入放射学会分类系统,主要并发症3例(2.6%),次要并发症6例(5.3%)。合并meta分析并发症发生率为10% (95% CI: 5%-20%, I2 = 40%)。随访期间未见肿瘤复发。结论:局部热消融治疗囊肾肿块是一种安全有效的治疗方法。大多数研究使用射频消融进行,强调需要进一步研究替代消融技术,如微波消融和冷冻消融。临床意义:局部热消融是治疗囊性肾肿块有效、安全的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Diagnostic and interventional radiology
Diagnostic and interventional radiology Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
自引率
4.80%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology (Diagn Interv Radiol) is the open access, online-only official publication of Turkish Society of Radiology. It is published bimonthly and the journal’s publication language is English. The journal is a medium for original articles, reviews, pictorial essays, technical notes related to all fields of diagnostic and interventional radiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信