Knowledge and attitudes towards dementia among health professionals in Somaliland: a pilot survey.

IF 1.7 Q2 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Mohamed Abdilahi Duale, Tewelde Tesfaye Gebremariam
{"title":"Knowledge and attitudes towards dementia among health professionals in Somaliland: a pilot survey.","authors":"Mohamed Abdilahi Duale, Tewelde Tesfaye Gebremariam","doi":"10.1186/s13104-025-07446-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study was aimed to evaluate the knowledge and attitudes of healthcare professionals in Somaliland towards dementia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between June and July 2023, we administered an adapted online survey consisting of 30 Alzheimer's disease Knowledge Scale (ADKS) true or false statements and 10 Dementia Care Attitude Scale (DCAS) Likert-scale items. The reliability of the Likert-scale DCAS items was assessed using Cronbach's alpha. The distribution of responses to DCAS statements was examined using a binomial test, and the relationship between knowledge or attitude and sample characteristics was assessed using Pearson's chi-squared test or Fisher's exact test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall validity (Cronbach's alpha) for DCAS statements (0.88) was greater than 0.80, indicating good level of internal consistency. Out of 107 healthcare workers who completed the survey, 53.3% had unfavourable attitude towards dementia care, and 49.5% had a moderate-to-high knowledge level.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our pilot survey revealed a lack of knowledge and attitudes about dementia among health professionals and urges high quality surveys to validate the results.</p>","PeriodicalId":9234,"journal":{"name":"BMC Research Notes","volume":"18 1","pages":"360"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12363011/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Research Notes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-025-07446-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study was aimed to evaluate the knowledge and attitudes of healthcare professionals in Somaliland towards dementia.

Methods: Between June and July 2023, we administered an adapted online survey consisting of 30 Alzheimer's disease Knowledge Scale (ADKS) true or false statements and 10 Dementia Care Attitude Scale (DCAS) Likert-scale items. The reliability of the Likert-scale DCAS items was assessed using Cronbach's alpha. The distribution of responses to DCAS statements was examined using a binomial test, and the relationship between knowledge or attitude and sample characteristics was assessed using Pearson's chi-squared test or Fisher's exact test.

Results: The overall validity (Cronbach's alpha) for DCAS statements (0.88) was greater than 0.80, indicating good level of internal consistency. Out of 107 healthcare workers who completed the survey, 53.3% had unfavourable attitude towards dementia care, and 49.5% had a moderate-to-high knowledge level.

Conclusions: Our pilot survey revealed a lack of knowledge and attitudes about dementia among health professionals and urges high quality surveys to validate the results.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

索马里兰保健专业人员对痴呆症的知识和态度:一项试点调查。
目的:本研究旨在评估索马里兰医疗保健专业人员对痴呆症的知识和态度。方法:在2023年6月至7月期间,我们实施了一项由30个阿尔茨海默病知识量表(ADKS)真假陈述和10个痴呆护理态度量表(DCAS)李克特量表组成的改编在线调查。李克特量表DCAS项目的信度采用Cronbach’s alpha进行评估。对DCAS陈述的反应分布采用二项检验,知识或态度与样本特征之间的关系采用Pearson卡方检验或Fisher精确检验。结果:DCAS语句的总体效度(Cronbach’s alpha)为0.88,大于0.80,表明内部一致性较好。在完成调查的107名医护人员中,53.3%的人对痴呆症护理持不良态度,49.5%的人对痴呆症护理有中高知识水平。结论:我们的试点调查揭示了卫生专业人员对痴呆症的知识和态度的缺乏,并敦促高质量的调查来验证结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Research Notes
BMC Research Notes Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology (all)
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
363
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Research Notes publishes scientifically valid research outputs that cannot be considered as full research or methodology articles. We support the research community across all scientific and clinical disciplines by providing an open access forum for sharing data and useful information; this includes, but is not limited to, updates to previous work, additions to established methods, short publications, null results, research proposals and data management plans.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信