Assessing patients' knowledge immediately after obtaining the antibacterial drug azithromycin: a community pharmacy-based cross-sectional study.

IF 1.7 Q2 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Asmaa S Mohamed, Hosam M A Refaei, Remon R Rofaeil
{"title":"Assessing patients' knowledge immediately after obtaining the antibacterial drug azithromycin: a community pharmacy-based cross-sectional study.","authors":"Asmaa S Mohamed, Hosam M A Refaei, Remon R Rofaeil","doi":"10.1186/s13104-025-07447-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This cross-sectional study was conducted across 38 community pharmacies and included 418 patients who were dispensed oral azithromycin. Pharmacists administered a structured questionnaire to collect demographic information and assess patients' knowledge regarding azithromycin use. Knowledge was evaluated based on responses related to the medication's name, dosage, frequency, potential side effects, and intended purpose. Based on their scores, participants were categorized as having poor (< 50%), average (50-70%), or good (> 70%) knowledge. The aim of this study was to assess patients' knowledge of azithromycin use and identify factors influencing their level of understanding.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 418 participants completed the questionnaire, with a mean age of 35.27 years; 75.60% were under 40 years old, and 62.20% were female. The majority were married (81.82%), resided in urban areas (57.89%), and held a university degree (67.70%). Azithromycin was prescribed by physicians for 62.20% of participants, while 29.67% obtained it directly from pharmacists via over-the-counter (OTC) access, and 8.13% self-medicated. Knowledge scores differed significantly according to marital status, place of residence, education level, and socioeconomic status, with higher scores observed among married, urban, university-educated, and higher-income individuals (p < 0.05). In contrast, age, gender, smoking status, and diabetes mellitus showed no significant association with knowledge scores. Overall, 21.53% of participants had poor knowledge, 46.41% had average knowledge, and 32.06% demonstrated good knowledge.</p>","PeriodicalId":9234,"journal":{"name":"BMC Research Notes","volume":"18 1","pages":"358"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12359916/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Research Notes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-025-07447-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This cross-sectional study was conducted across 38 community pharmacies and included 418 patients who were dispensed oral azithromycin. Pharmacists administered a structured questionnaire to collect demographic information and assess patients' knowledge regarding azithromycin use. Knowledge was evaluated based on responses related to the medication's name, dosage, frequency, potential side effects, and intended purpose. Based on their scores, participants were categorized as having poor (< 50%), average (50-70%), or good (> 70%) knowledge. The aim of this study was to assess patients' knowledge of azithromycin use and identify factors influencing their level of understanding.

Results: A total of 418 participants completed the questionnaire, with a mean age of 35.27 years; 75.60% were under 40 years old, and 62.20% were female. The majority were married (81.82%), resided in urban areas (57.89%), and held a university degree (67.70%). Azithromycin was prescribed by physicians for 62.20% of participants, while 29.67% obtained it directly from pharmacists via over-the-counter (OTC) access, and 8.13% self-medicated. Knowledge scores differed significantly according to marital status, place of residence, education level, and socioeconomic status, with higher scores observed among married, urban, university-educated, and higher-income individuals (p < 0.05). In contrast, age, gender, smoking status, and diabetes mellitus showed no significant association with knowledge scores. Overall, 21.53% of participants had poor knowledge, 46.41% had average knowledge, and 32.06% demonstrated good knowledge.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

在获得抗菌药物阿奇霉素后立即评估患者的知识:一项基于社区药学的横断面研究。
目的:本横断面研究在38家社区药房进行,包括418名口服阿奇霉素的患者。药剂师使用结构化问卷收集人口统计信息并评估患者对阿奇霉素使用的了解。知识评估是基于与药物名称、剂量、使用频率、潜在副作用和预期用途相关的反应。根据他们的分数,参与者被归类为知识贫乏(70%)。本研究的目的是评估患者对阿奇霉素使用的了解程度,并确定影响其了解程度的因素。结果:共完成问卷418人,平均年龄35.27岁;40岁以下占75.60%,女性占62.20%。大多数人已婚(81.82%),居住在城市(57.89%),拥有大学学历(67.70%)。62.20%的参与者由医生处方阿奇霉素,29.67%的参与者通过非处方药(OTC)直接从药剂师那里获得阿奇霉素,8.13%的参与者自行用药。知识得分在婚姻状况、居住地、教育水平和社会经济地位方面存在显著差异,在已婚、城市、受过大学教育和高收入人群中得分较高
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Research Notes
BMC Research Notes Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology (all)
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
363
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Research Notes publishes scientifically valid research outputs that cannot be considered as full research or methodology articles. We support the research community across all scientific and clinical disciplines by providing an open access forum for sharing data and useful information; this includes, but is not limited to, updates to previous work, additions to established methods, short publications, null results, research proposals and data management plans.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信