Revised Ocular Trauma Score (rOTS): to develop and internally validate a predictive model for visual outcomes after open globe injury.

IF 2.2 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Parinee Kemchoknatee, Jayanton Patumanond, Somporn Chantra, Pennung Thongtong, Nattaporn Vongsa, Rinrada Kreesang, Dolchanok Dolman, Thansit Srisombut
{"title":"Revised Ocular Trauma Score (rOTS): to develop and internally validate a predictive model for visual outcomes after open globe injury.","authors":"Parinee Kemchoknatee, Jayanton Patumanond, Somporn Chantra, Pennung Thongtong, Nattaporn Vongsa, Rinrada Kreesang, Dolchanok Dolman, Thansit Srisombut","doi":"10.1136/bmjophth-2025-002265","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We aimed to develop and validate a prognostic scoring model for predicting poor visual outcomes in patients with open globe injury (OGI).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A retrospective cohort study of patients with OGI from two teaching hospitals in Thailand.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>311 patients diagnosed with OGI between 2016 and 2023 were used to develop a multivariable logistic regression model predicting final visual acuity aimed at 6 months post-OGI. Visual outcomes were categorised into two groups using 20/200 as the cut-off for legal blindness. The model's performance was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Internal validation was conducted with bootstrapping for 500 replications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>133 patients (42.77%) had visual acuity worse than 20/200 at the 6-month follow-up. The median follow-up time was 4.14 months, with an IQR of 3.00-11.74 months. Initial visual acuity (VA), relative afferent pupillary defect, rupture and eyelid injury were among the strongest predictors of visual outcome. Discrimination and calibration of the scoring model were satisfactory, with a C-statistic of 0.8671, a slope of 1 and a calibration-in-the-large of 0. Risk groups were created, categorised as mild, moderate and severe, with a C-statistic of 0.8094. The ORs for poor final VA (≤20/200) at 6 months were 1.51 (95% CI, 0.93 to 2.48) and 45.06 (95% CI, 11.20 to 387.94) in the moderate and severe risk groups, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our prognostic model (revised Ocular Trauma Score) can be seamlessly used in emergency settings to predict visual outcomes in patients presenting with OGI. Presenting visual acuity (VA) is the strongest predictor. Interpretation should be made with caution due to several limitations, including the predominance of severe cases inherent to a referral-based setting, the relatively small sample size and the absence of paediatric patients. External validation of our model is needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":9286,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Ophthalmology","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12359408/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjophth-2025-002265","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: We aimed to develop and validate a prognostic scoring model for predicting poor visual outcomes in patients with open globe injury (OGI).

Design: A retrospective cohort study of patients with OGI from two teaching hospitals in Thailand.

Methods: 311 patients diagnosed with OGI between 2016 and 2023 were used to develop a multivariable logistic regression model predicting final visual acuity aimed at 6 months post-OGI. Visual outcomes were categorised into two groups using 20/200 as the cut-off for legal blindness. The model's performance was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Internal validation was conducted with bootstrapping for 500 replications.

Results: 133 patients (42.77%) had visual acuity worse than 20/200 at the 6-month follow-up. The median follow-up time was 4.14 months, with an IQR of 3.00-11.74 months. Initial visual acuity (VA), relative afferent pupillary defect, rupture and eyelid injury were among the strongest predictors of visual outcome. Discrimination and calibration of the scoring model were satisfactory, with a C-statistic of 0.8671, a slope of 1 and a calibration-in-the-large of 0. Risk groups were created, categorised as mild, moderate and severe, with a C-statistic of 0.8094. The ORs for poor final VA (≤20/200) at 6 months were 1.51 (95% CI, 0.93 to 2.48) and 45.06 (95% CI, 11.20 to 387.94) in the moderate and severe risk groups, respectively.

Conclusions: Our prognostic model (revised Ocular Trauma Score) can be seamlessly used in emergency settings to predict visual outcomes in patients presenting with OGI. Presenting visual acuity (VA) is the strongest predictor. Interpretation should be made with caution due to several limitations, including the predominance of severe cases inherent to a referral-based setting, the relatively small sample size and the absence of paediatric patients. External validation of our model is needed.

Abstract Image

修订眼外伤评分(rot):开发并内部验证开放性眼球损伤后视力预后的预测模型。
目的:我们旨在建立并验证一个预测开放性眼球损伤(OGI)患者视力不良的预后评分模型。设计:对泰国两所教学医院OGI患者进行回顾性队列研究。方法:选取2016年至2023年间确诊为OGI的311例患者,建立多变量logistic回归模型,预测OGI后6个月的最终视力。视力结果以20/200作为法定失明的临界值分为两组。采用接收机工作特性曲线分析对模型的性能进行评价。内部验证用bootstrapping进行了500个重复。结果:随访6个月时,视力低于20/200者133例(42.77%)。中位随访时间4.14个月,IQR为3.00 ~ 11.74个月。初始视力(VA)、相对传入瞳孔缺损、破裂和眼睑损伤是视力预后的最强预测因子。评分模型的判别和校正结果令人满意,c统计量为0.8671,斜率为1,校正量为0。创建了风险组,分为轻度、中度和重度,c统计量为0.8094。中度和重度风险组6个月时最终VA差(≤20/200)的or分别为1.51 (95% CI, 0.93 ~ 2.48)和45.06 (95% CI, 11.20 ~ 387.94)。结论:我们的预后模型(修订后的眼外伤评分)可以无缝地用于紧急情况下预测OGI患者的视力结果。视敏度(VA)是最强的预测因子。由于一些局限性,包括以转诊为基础的环境所固有的严重病例占主导地位,样本量相对较小以及没有儿科患者,因此应谨慎解释。我们的模型需要外部验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Open Ophthalmology
BMJ Open Ophthalmology OPHTHALMOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
4.20%
发文量
104
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信