A framework for biosafety assessment of microbial strains in Biotechnology applications.

IF 1.9
Bioinformation Pub Date : 2025-05-31 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.6026/973206300211158
Swati Shrivastava, Abhishek Sharma, Nidhi Sharma, Alishan Fehmina
{"title":"A framework for biosafety assessment of microbial strains in Biotechnology applications.","authors":"Swati Shrivastava, Abhishek Sharma, Nidhi Sharma, Alishan Fehmina","doi":"10.6026/973206300211158","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Biosafety refers to the principles and practices that prevent unintentional exposure to biological agents and limit their potential harm to humans and the environment. Therefore, we developed a comprehensive biosafety assessment framework for 40 microbial strains used in biotechnology, evaluating five key parameters: pathogenicity, immunogenicity, environmental persistence, genetic stability, and taxonomy. Principal component analysis showed that 84% of the risk variation was unrelated to taxonomy, emphasizing the need for strain-specific evaluations. Among the strains assessed, 76% of fungi triggered high levels of TNF-α and IL-6 in immune cell assays, and 68% persisted beyond 30 days in simulated environmental conditions. Meanwhile, 71% of gram-negative bacteria carried virulence genes (<i>et al.</i>, hlyA, invA) and exhibited significant cytotoxicity in human cell cultures. These findings support a data-driven, parameter-based approach for advancing biosafety standards in modern biotechnology.</p>","PeriodicalId":8962,"journal":{"name":"Bioinformation","volume":"21 5","pages":"1158-1162"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12357737/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioinformation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6026/973206300211158","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Biosafety refers to the principles and practices that prevent unintentional exposure to biological agents and limit their potential harm to humans and the environment. Therefore, we developed a comprehensive biosafety assessment framework for 40 microbial strains used in biotechnology, evaluating five key parameters: pathogenicity, immunogenicity, environmental persistence, genetic stability, and taxonomy. Principal component analysis showed that 84% of the risk variation was unrelated to taxonomy, emphasizing the need for strain-specific evaluations. Among the strains assessed, 76% of fungi triggered high levels of TNF-α and IL-6 in immune cell assays, and 68% persisted beyond 30 days in simulated environmental conditions. Meanwhile, 71% of gram-negative bacteria carried virulence genes (et al., hlyA, invA) and exhibited significant cytotoxicity in human cell cultures. These findings support a data-driven, parameter-based approach for advancing biosafety standards in modern biotechnology.

生物技术应用中微生物菌株生物安全性评价框架。
生物安全是指防止无意接触生物制剂并限制其对人类和环境的潜在危害的原则和做法。因此,我们为40种用于生物技术的微生物菌株建立了一个综合的生物安全性评估框架,评估了五个关键参数:致病性、免疫原性、环境持久性、遗传稳定性和分类。主成分分析显示,84%的风险变异与分类无关,强调了菌株特异性评估的必要性。在所评估的菌株中,76%的真菌在免疫细胞检测中触发高水平的TNF-α和IL-6, 68%的真菌在模拟环境条件下持续超过30天。同时,71%的革兰氏阴性菌携带毒力基因(如hlyA、invA等),在人细胞培养中表现出显著的细胞毒性。这些发现支持一种数据驱动的、基于参数的方法来推进现代生物技术中的生物安全标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Bioinformation
Bioinformation MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
128
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信