Should transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt be first-line therapy for preventing esophageal variceal rebleeding? A meta-analysis of clinical outcomes.

Q3 Medicine
Baylor University Medical Center Proceedings Pub Date : 2025-06-11 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1080/08998280.2025.2514978
Rutaab Kareem, Aimen Nadeem, Noor Us Sehar, Zuha Majid, Tehniat Fatima, Rahma Anwar
{"title":"Should transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt be first-line therapy for preventing esophageal variceal rebleeding? A meta-analysis of clinical outcomes.","authors":"Rutaab Kareem, Aimen Nadeem, Noor Us Sehar, Zuha Majid, Tehniat Fatima, Rahma Anwar","doi":"10.1080/08998280.2025.2514978","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>According to Baveno VII guidelines, endoscopic band ligation (EBL) plus nonselective beta-blockers (NSBB) is first-line therapy for preventing esophageal variceal rebleeding, with transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) being used in cases of treatment failure. Our study aimed to compare TIPS with EBL plus NSBB in terms of overall mortality and rate of variceal rebleeding.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a comprehensive search on Medline, Google Scholar, Embase, and the Cochrane Library up to January 25, 2025. Randomized control trials (RCTs) comparing TIPS with EBL plus NSBB for variceal bleeding were included in the study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eight RCTs with 629 patients, 336 receiving TIPS and 293 receiving EBL + NSBB, were included. TIPS had significantly lower rates of variceal rebleeding (odds ratio 0.30, 95% confidence interval 0.19-0.49, <i>P</i> < 0.00001), all-cause rebleeding (<i>P</i> < 0.0001), total episodes of rebleeding (<i>P</i> < 0.0001), new/worsening ascites (<i>P</i> < 0.0001), and peritonitis (<i>P</i> = 0.01). No significant differences were found in mortality, sepsis/pneumonia, hepatic encephalopathy, or hepatocellular carcinoma.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>TIPS offers significant advantages over EBL plus NSBB in reducing variceal rebleeding and other complications but does not improve mortality. Further high-powered trials are needed to refine management strategies for variceal rebleeding in cirrhotic patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":8828,"journal":{"name":"Baylor University Medical Center Proceedings","volume":"38 5","pages":"627-636"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12351698/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Baylor University Medical Center Proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08998280.2025.2514978","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: According to Baveno VII guidelines, endoscopic band ligation (EBL) plus nonselective beta-blockers (NSBB) is first-line therapy for preventing esophageal variceal rebleeding, with transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) being used in cases of treatment failure. Our study aimed to compare TIPS with EBL plus NSBB in terms of overall mortality and rate of variceal rebleeding.

Methods: We conducted a comprehensive search on Medline, Google Scholar, Embase, and the Cochrane Library up to January 25, 2025. Randomized control trials (RCTs) comparing TIPS with EBL plus NSBB for variceal bleeding were included in the study.

Results: Eight RCTs with 629 patients, 336 receiving TIPS and 293 receiving EBL + NSBB, were included. TIPS had significantly lower rates of variceal rebleeding (odds ratio 0.30, 95% confidence interval 0.19-0.49, P < 0.00001), all-cause rebleeding (P < 0.0001), total episodes of rebleeding (P < 0.0001), new/worsening ascites (P < 0.0001), and peritonitis (P = 0.01). No significant differences were found in mortality, sepsis/pneumonia, hepatic encephalopathy, or hepatocellular carcinoma.

Conclusion: TIPS offers significant advantages over EBL plus NSBB in reducing variceal rebleeding and other complications but does not improve mortality. Further high-powered trials are needed to refine management strategies for variceal rebleeding in cirrhotic patients.

经颈静脉肝内门静脉系统分流术应作为预防食管静脉曲张再出血的一线治疗方法吗?临床结果荟萃分析。
简介:根据Baveno VII指南,内镜下带状结扎(EBL)联合非选择性β受体阻滞剂(NSBB)是预防食管静脉曲张再出血的一线治疗方法,治疗失败时可使用经颈静脉肝内门静脉系统分流术(TIPS)。我们的研究旨在比较TIPS与EBL + NSBB在总死亡率和静脉曲张再出血率方面的差异。方法:我们在Medline,谷歌Scholar, Embase和Cochrane Library进行了全面的检索,截止到2025年1月25日。该研究纳入了比较TIPS与EBL + NSBB治疗静脉曲张出血的随机对照试验(rct)。结果:8项随机对照试验共纳入629例患者,其中TIPS组336例,EBL + NSBB组293例。TIPS组静脉曲张再出血发生率显著低于对照组(优势比0.30,95%可信区间0.19-0.49,P P P P P = 0.01)。在死亡率、败血症/肺炎、肝性脑病或肝细胞癌方面没有发现显著差异。结论:TIPS与EBL + NSBB相比,在减少静脉曲张再出血和其他并发症方面具有显著优势,但不能提高死亡率。需要进一步的高强度试验来完善肝硬化患者静脉曲张再出血的治疗策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
245
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信