Machine Learning Models for Predicting In-Hospital Mortality in Burn Patients.

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Samet Şahin, Burak Yavuz, Onur Karaca, Merve Akın, Ali Emre Akgün
{"title":"Machine Learning Models for Predicting In-Hospital Mortality in Burn Patients.","authors":"Samet Şahin, Burak Yavuz, Onur Karaca, Merve Akın, Ali Emre Akgün","doi":"10.62713/aic.3944","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To develop and evaluate predictive models for in-hospital mortality in burn patients using machine learning (ML) techniques.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study was conducted using data from burn patients admitted to Ankara Bilkent City Hospital Burn Treatment Center between 2015 and 2020. Key variables including age, gender, total body surface area burned, burn depth, burn type, inhalation injury, inflammatory markers and inflammatory indexes were collected. Seven ML models-Logistic Regression, Random Forest, Support Vector Machine, Decision Tree, K-Nearest Neighbors, Naive Bayes, and Gradient Boosting-were trained and evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The cohort included 218 patients (mean age 42.5 ± 18.5 years; 69.7% male, 30.3% female), with an in-hospital mortality rate of 18.8% (n = 41). Logistic Regression had the best performance (accuracy: 88.6%, Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC)-Area Under Curve (AUC): 0.906), while Random Forest achieved the highest accuracy (90.9%) and recall (97.2%). K-Nearest Neighbors excelled in recall (99.0%), Gradient Boosting balanced precision and recall (91.6% each, ROC-AUC: 0.744), and Support Vector Machine showed moderate results (accuracy: 84.0%, ROC-AUC: 0.864).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ML models, particularly Logistic Regression and Random Forest, demonstrated strong predictive capabilities for mortality in burn patients. This study supports the potential for ML in burn care, offering a data-driven approach for personalized prognosis and clinical decision-making. Further multicenter validation is recommended.</p>","PeriodicalId":8210,"journal":{"name":"Annali italiani di chirurgia","volume":"96 8","pages":"1039-1046"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annali italiani di chirurgia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.62713/aic.3944","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: To develop and evaluate predictive models for in-hospital mortality in burn patients using machine learning (ML) techniques.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using data from burn patients admitted to Ankara Bilkent City Hospital Burn Treatment Center between 2015 and 2020. Key variables including age, gender, total body surface area burned, burn depth, burn type, inhalation injury, inflammatory markers and inflammatory indexes were collected. Seven ML models-Logistic Regression, Random Forest, Support Vector Machine, Decision Tree, K-Nearest Neighbors, Naive Bayes, and Gradient Boosting-were trained and evaluated.

Results: The cohort included 218 patients (mean age 42.5 ± 18.5 years; 69.7% male, 30.3% female), with an in-hospital mortality rate of 18.8% (n = 41). Logistic Regression had the best performance (accuracy: 88.6%, Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC)-Area Under Curve (AUC): 0.906), while Random Forest achieved the highest accuracy (90.9%) and recall (97.2%). K-Nearest Neighbors excelled in recall (99.0%), Gradient Boosting balanced precision and recall (91.6% each, ROC-AUC: 0.744), and Support Vector Machine showed moderate results (accuracy: 84.0%, ROC-AUC: 0.864).

Conclusions: ML models, particularly Logistic Regression and Random Forest, demonstrated strong predictive capabilities for mortality in burn patients. This study supports the potential for ML in burn care, offering a data-driven approach for personalized prognosis and clinical decision-making. Further multicenter validation is recommended.

预测烧伤患者住院死亡率的机器学习模型。
目的:利用机器学习(ML)技术开发和评估烧伤患者住院死亡率的预测模型。方法:对2015年至2020年安卡拉比尔肯特市医院烧伤治疗中心收治的烧伤患者数据进行回顾性队列研究。关键变量包括年龄、性别、烧伤总面积、烧伤深度、烧伤类型、吸入性损伤、炎症标志物和炎症指标。七个ML模型——逻辑回归、随机森林、支持向量机、决策树、k近邻、朴素贝叶斯和梯度提升——被训练和评估。结果:纳入218例患者(平均年龄42.5±18.5岁,男性69.7%,女性30.3%),住院死亡率为18.8% (n = 41)。Logistic回归的准确率为88.6%,受试者工作特征(ROC)-曲线下面积(AUC)为0.906,随机森林的准确率为90.9%,召回率为97.2%。k近邻在召回率(99.0%),梯度增强平衡精度和召回率(各91.6%,ROC-AUC: 0.744),支持向量机显示中等结果(准确率:84.0%,ROC-AUC: 0.864)。结论:ML模型,特别是Logistic回归和随机森林模型,对烧伤患者的死亡率具有很强的预测能力。这项研究支持了ML在烧伤护理中的潜力,为个性化预后和临床决策提供了数据驱动的方法。建议进一步进行多中心验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
12.50%
发文量
116
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Annali Italiani di Chirurgia is a bimonthly journal and covers all aspects of surgery:elective, emergency and experimental surgery, as well as problems involving technology, teaching, organization and forensic medicine. The articles are published in Italian or English, though English is preferred because it facilitates the international diffusion of the journal (v.Guidelines for Authors and Norme per gli Autori). The articles published are divided into three main sections:editorials, original articles, and case reports and innovations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信