Mosapride combined with rebamipide demonstrates superior efficacy for treatment of chronic atrophic gastritis.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
American journal of translational research Pub Date : 2025-07-15 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.62347/YMOB9811
Sisi Shen, Jiawei Fei
{"title":"Mosapride combined with rebamipide demonstrates superior efficacy for treatment of chronic atrophic gastritis.","authors":"Sisi Shen, Jiawei Fei","doi":"10.62347/YMOB9811","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of combining mosapride with rebamipide for treatment of chronic atrophic gastritis (CAG).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 116 patients with confirmed CAG were enrolled. The control group (n=52) received mosapride alone, while the observation group (n=64) was treated with both mosapride and rebamipide. Therapeutic outcomes, adverse events, pathological scores, symptom relief time, and serological markers were compared between the groups. Univariate and multivariate analyses were also conducted to identify factors influencing treatment efficacy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The observation group exhibited a significantly higher overall effective rate than the control group (P<0.05), with no significant difference in adverse events (P>0.05). Pathological scores were significantly lower in the observation group both compared to baseline and to the control group (P<0.05). Additionally, the observation group had greater improvements in all serological markers and a shorter duration to symptom relief (all P<0.05). Multivariate analysis identified smoking history (P=0.017, OR=4.318), alcohol consumption history (P=0.002, OR=6.327), and epidermal growth factor levels (P=0.044, OR=3.394) as independent risk factors for treatment response.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The combination of mosapride and rebamipide offers superior efficacy in managing CAG without increasing adverse effects. It significantly improves pathological conditions, expedites symptom resolution, and enhances gastric mucosal biomarker profiles, supporting its broader clinical application.</p>","PeriodicalId":7731,"journal":{"name":"American journal of translational research","volume":"17 7","pages":"5502-5510"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12351561/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of translational research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.62347/YMOB9811","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of combining mosapride with rebamipide for treatment of chronic atrophic gastritis (CAG).

Methods: A total of 116 patients with confirmed CAG were enrolled. The control group (n=52) received mosapride alone, while the observation group (n=64) was treated with both mosapride and rebamipide. Therapeutic outcomes, adverse events, pathological scores, symptom relief time, and serological markers were compared between the groups. Univariate and multivariate analyses were also conducted to identify factors influencing treatment efficacy.

Results: The observation group exhibited a significantly higher overall effective rate than the control group (P<0.05), with no significant difference in adverse events (P>0.05). Pathological scores were significantly lower in the observation group both compared to baseline and to the control group (P<0.05). Additionally, the observation group had greater improvements in all serological markers and a shorter duration to symptom relief (all P<0.05). Multivariate analysis identified smoking history (P=0.017, OR=4.318), alcohol consumption history (P=0.002, OR=6.327), and epidermal growth factor levels (P=0.044, OR=3.394) as independent risk factors for treatment response.

Conclusion: The combination of mosapride and rebamipide offers superior efficacy in managing CAG without increasing adverse effects. It significantly improves pathological conditions, expedites symptom resolution, and enhances gastric mucosal biomarker profiles, supporting its broader clinical application.

莫沙必利联合利巴米胺治疗慢性萎缩性胃炎疗效显著。
目的:评价莫沙必利联合利巴米胺治疗慢性萎缩性胃炎(CAG)的疗效。方法:共纳入116例确诊CAG患者。对照组(n=52)单独给予莫沙必利治疗,观察组(n=64)同时给予莫沙必利和利巴米胺治疗。比较两组患者的治疗结果、不良事件、病理评分、症状缓解时间和血清学指标。并进行单因素和多因素分析,以确定影响治疗效果的因素。结果:观察组总有效率显著高于对照组(P0.05)。观察组病理评分均明显低于基线组和对照组(p结论:莫沙必利联合利巴米胺治疗CAG疗效优越,且不良反应不增加。它显著改善病理状况,加速症状解决,增强胃粘膜生物标志物谱,支持其更广泛的临床应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American journal of translational research
American journal of translational research ONCOLOGY-MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
自引率
0.00%
发文量
552
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信