Biofeedback magnetic stimulation improves postoperative bowel dysfunction after rectal cancer surgery.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
American journal of translational research Pub Date : 2025-07-25 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.62347/XBDR6986
Yang Lin, Gang Mao, Jinghua Liang, Lu Liu
{"title":"Biofeedback magnetic stimulation improves postoperative bowel dysfunction after rectal cancer surgery.","authors":"Yang Lin, Gang Mao, Jinghua Liang, Lu Liu","doi":"10.62347/XBDR6986","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the clinical efficacy of biofeedback magnetic stimulation (BFMS) in the management of postoperative bowel dysfunction (PBD) after rectal cancer surgery and to identify independent predictors of treatment outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study was conducted involving 158 patients who underwent low anterior resection between 2018 and 2023. Patients were divided into two groups: the observation group, consisting of 83 individuals, received BFMS; whereas the control group, comprising 75 individuals, underwent conventional rehabilitation. Defecation function, anorectal manometric parameters - including resting and pressure (RAP), maximum squeeze pressure (MSP), and maximum tolerated volume (MTV) - as well as Wexner scores and QLQ-CR29 quality-of-life scores were assessed at 1, 2, and 3 months postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At 2 and 3 months postoperatively, the observation group showed significantly greater improvement in defecation function, anorectal pressure metrics, and quality of life scores compared to controls (P<0.05). The incidence of adverse reactions was comparable between groups (14.46% vs. 6.67%, P>0.05). Multivariate analysis revealed that anastomotic leakage, ultra-low rectal cancer, interspinous diameter, and treatment method were independent predictors of postoperative outcomes (P<0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>BFMS is a safe and effective therapeutic approach for improving bowel function and quality of life in patients with PBD after rectal cancer surgery. Anatomical and surgical variables may serve as important predictors of treatment response.</p>","PeriodicalId":7731,"journal":{"name":"American journal of translational research","volume":"17 7","pages":"5667-5678"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12351603/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of translational research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.62347/XBDR6986","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the clinical efficacy of biofeedback magnetic stimulation (BFMS) in the management of postoperative bowel dysfunction (PBD) after rectal cancer surgery and to identify independent predictors of treatment outcomes.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted involving 158 patients who underwent low anterior resection between 2018 and 2023. Patients were divided into two groups: the observation group, consisting of 83 individuals, received BFMS; whereas the control group, comprising 75 individuals, underwent conventional rehabilitation. Defecation function, anorectal manometric parameters - including resting and pressure (RAP), maximum squeeze pressure (MSP), and maximum tolerated volume (MTV) - as well as Wexner scores and QLQ-CR29 quality-of-life scores were assessed at 1, 2, and 3 months postoperatively.

Results: At 2 and 3 months postoperatively, the observation group showed significantly greater improvement in defecation function, anorectal pressure metrics, and quality of life scores compared to controls (P<0.05). The incidence of adverse reactions was comparable between groups (14.46% vs. 6.67%, P>0.05). Multivariate analysis revealed that anastomotic leakage, ultra-low rectal cancer, interspinous diameter, and treatment method were independent predictors of postoperative outcomes (P<0.05).

Conclusion: BFMS is a safe and effective therapeutic approach for improving bowel function and quality of life in patients with PBD after rectal cancer surgery. Anatomical and surgical variables may serve as important predictors of treatment response.

生物反馈磁刺激改善直肠癌术后肠功能障碍。
目的:评价生物反馈磁刺激(BFMS)治疗直肠癌术后肠功能障碍(PBD)的临床疗效,并确定治疗结果的独立预测因素。方法:回顾性队列研究,纳入2018年至2023年间行低位前切除术的158例患者。患者分为两组:观察组83例,接受BFMS治疗;而由75人组成的对照组则接受常规康复治疗。在术后1、2和3个月评估排便功能、肛肠压力参数(包括静息和压力(RAP)、最大挤压压力(MSP)和最大耐受容积(MTV))以及Wexner评分和QLQ-CR29生活质量评分。结果:术后2、3个月,观察组患者的排便功能、肛肠压力指标、生活质量评分均较对照组有明显改善(P0.05)。多因素分析显示,吻合口漏、超低直肠癌、棘间直径和治疗方法是术后预后的独立预测因素(p结论:BFMS是一种安全有效的改善直肠癌术后PBD患者肠道功能和生活质量的治疗方法。解剖和手术变量可以作为治疗反应的重要预测因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American journal of translational research
American journal of translational research ONCOLOGY-MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
自引率
0.00%
发文量
552
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信