Bedside inoculation accelerates detection and improves microbiological diagnosis efficiency compared to delayed inoculation.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
American journal of translational research Pub Date : 2025-07-25 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.62347/IJYI9617
Yulan Shi, Jingya Yu
{"title":"Bedside inoculation accelerates detection and improves microbiological diagnosis efficiency compared to delayed inoculation.","authors":"Yulan Shi, Jingya Yu","doi":"10.62347/IJYI9617","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the differences in effects between bedside inoculation and traditional delayed inoculation methods in diagnosing wound infections, focusing on positivity rates, diagnostic cycles, and therapeutic outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective interventional study was conducted at the Wound Treatment Center of West China Hospital, Sichuan University, from April 2023 to July 2024. Patients were randomly assigned to a bedside inoculation group (n=132) or a delayed inoculation group (n=132). The effectiveness of the two methods was compared based on wound culture outcomes, bacterial species identified, detection of rare bacteria, wound healing rates, and patient satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The bedside inoculation group had a significantly shorter detection report time compared to the delayed inoculation group (P<0.001). It also demonstrated a higher rate of detecting complex microbiomes (P=0.003). After 4 weeks, wound area reduction was significantly greater in the bedside group (P<0.001), and this difference remained significant at 8 weeks. The bedside group also had higher Barthel index scores (P<0.05), better wound healing scores (P<0.001), and greater patient satisfaction (P<0.001) than the delayed group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Bedside inoculation enhances wound infection diagnosis by accelerating result turnaround, reducing overtreatment, and promoting faster healing, ultimately improving patient care.</p>","PeriodicalId":7731,"journal":{"name":"American journal of translational research","volume":"17 7","pages":"5575-5585"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12351590/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of translational research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.62347/IJYI9617","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the differences in effects between bedside inoculation and traditional delayed inoculation methods in diagnosing wound infections, focusing on positivity rates, diagnostic cycles, and therapeutic outcomes.

Methods: This prospective interventional study was conducted at the Wound Treatment Center of West China Hospital, Sichuan University, from April 2023 to July 2024. Patients were randomly assigned to a bedside inoculation group (n=132) or a delayed inoculation group (n=132). The effectiveness of the two methods was compared based on wound culture outcomes, bacterial species identified, detection of rare bacteria, wound healing rates, and patient satisfaction.

Results: The bedside inoculation group had a significantly shorter detection report time compared to the delayed inoculation group (P<0.001). It also demonstrated a higher rate of detecting complex microbiomes (P=0.003). After 4 weeks, wound area reduction was significantly greater in the bedside group (P<0.001), and this difference remained significant at 8 weeks. The bedside group also had higher Barthel index scores (P<0.05), better wound healing scores (P<0.001), and greater patient satisfaction (P<0.001) than the delayed group.

Conclusion: Bedside inoculation enhances wound infection diagnosis by accelerating result turnaround, reducing overtreatment, and promoting faster healing, ultimately improving patient care.

与延迟接种相比,床边接种加快了检测速度,提高了微生物诊断效率。
目的:评价床边接种与传统延迟接种在伤口感染诊断中的效果差异,重点分析阳性率、诊断周期和治疗结果。方法:本前瞻性介入研究于2023年4月至2024年7月在四川大学华西医院创面治疗中心进行。患者随机分为床边接种组(n=132)和延迟接种组(n=132)。根据伤口培养结果、细菌种类鉴定、罕见细菌检测、伤口愈合率和患者满意度,比较两种方法的有效性。结果:床边接种组的检测报告时间明显短于延迟接种组(p结论:床边接种通过加速结果转化、减少过度治疗、促进更快愈合来提高伤口感染诊断,最终改善患者护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American journal of translational research
American journal of translational research ONCOLOGY-MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
自引率
0.00%
发文量
552
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信