{"title":"Bedside inoculation accelerates detection and improves microbiological diagnosis efficiency compared to delayed inoculation.","authors":"Yulan Shi, Jingya Yu","doi":"10.62347/IJYI9617","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the differences in effects between bedside inoculation and traditional delayed inoculation methods in diagnosing wound infections, focusing on positivity rates, diagnostic cycles, and therapeutic outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective interventional study was conducted at the Wound Treatment Center of West China Hospital, Sichuan University, from April 2023 to July 2024. Patients were randomly assigned to a bedside inoculation group (n=132) or a delayed inoculation group (n=132). The effectiveness of the two methods was compared based on wound culture outcomes, bacterial species identified, detection of rare bacteria, wound healing rates, and patient satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The bedside inoculation group had a significantly shorter detection report time compared to the delayed inoculation group (P<0.001). It also demonstrated a higher rate of detecting complex microbiomes (P=0.003). After 4 weeks, wound area reduction was significantly greater in the bedside group (P<0.001), and this difference remained significant at 8 weeks. The bedside group also had higher Barthel index scores (P<0.05), better wound healing scores (P<0.001), and greater patient satisfaction (P<0.001) than the delayed group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Bedside inoculation enhances wound infection diagnosis by accelerating result turnaround, reducing overtreatment, and promoting faster healing, ultimately improving patient care.</p>","PeriodicalId":7731,"journal":{"name":"American journal of translational research","volume":"17 7","pages":"5575-5585"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12351590/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of translational research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.62347/IJYI9617","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the differences in effects between bedside inoculation and traditional delayed inoculation methods in diagnosing wound infections, focusing on positivity rates, diagnostic cycles, and therapeutic outcomes.
Methods: This prospective interventional study was conducted at the Wound Treatment Center of West China Hospital, Sichuan University, from April 2023 to July 2024. Patients were randomly assigned to a bedside inoculation group (n=132) or a delayed inoculation group (n=132). The effectiveness of the two methods was compared based on wound culture outcomes, bacterial species identified, detection of rare bacteria, wound healing rates, and patient satisfaction.
Results: The bedside inoculation group had a significantly shorter detection report time compared to the delayed inoculation group (P<0.001). It also demonstrated a higher rate of detecting complex microbiomes (P=0.003). After 4 weeks, wound area reduction was significantly greater in the bedside group (P<0.001), and this difference remained significant at 8 weeks. The bedside group also had higher Barthel index scores (P<0.05), better wound healing scores (P<0.001), and greater patient satisfaction (P<0.001) than the delayed group.
Conclusion: Bedside inoculation enhances wound infection diagnosis by accelerating result turnaround, reducing overtreatment, and promoting faster healing, ultimately improving patient care.