The impact of cancer survivors' extra risk of non-cancer mortality on net survival estimation.

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Laura Botta, Riccardo Capocaccia, Alice Bernasconi, Silvia Rossi, Jaume Galceran, Luigino Dal Maso, Come Lepage, Florence Molinié, Anne-Marie Bouvier, Rafael Marcos-Gragera, Claudia Vener, Marcela Guevara, Deirdre Murray, Rosalia Ragusa, Gemma Gatta, Valerie Jooste, The Eurocare- Wg
{"title":"The impact of cancer survivors' extra risk of non-cancer mortality on net survival estimation.","authors":"Laura Botta, Riccardo Capocaccia, Alice Bernasconi, Silvia Rossi, Jaume Galceran, Luigino Dal Maso, Come Lepage, Florence Molinié, Anne-Marie Bouvier, Rafael Marcos-Gragera, Claudia Vener, Marcela Guevara, Deirdre Murray, Rosalia Ragusa, Gemma Gatta, Valerie Jooste, The Eurocare- Wg","doi":"10.1093/aje/kwaf148","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Relative survival with the general population as the reference (RS) is commonly used to estimate net survival (NS). However, cancer patients may face an increased risk of non-cancer death compared to cancer-free individuals. We evaluate the impact of considering this relative risk (RR) on NS estimation. First, we compared selected NS values to generated RS under various theoretical scenarios, considering different RR, NS, age at diagnosis, time since diagnosis, and sex. Then, differences between NS and RS for three cancers were analyzed from cure model based estimates using EUROCARE-6 data. We observed differences between RS and the true value of NS, larger for longer time since diagnosis, older patients and higher NS. For head and neck cancer, the smallest differences were for young female patients at 5 years from diagnosis (4%) and the highest (32%) for older patients. For colorectal cancer, differences were <7% for all ages, both sexes, and times since diagnosis and for breast cancer, differences were <5% except for older patients after 5 years. If RR>1, RS underestimates NS. Our findings aim to correctly interpret the differences between RS and NS, and contextualise the possible biases of assuming RS as a proxy for cancer-specific survival.</p>","PeriodicalId":7472,"journal":{"name":"American journal of epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwaf148","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Relative survival with the general population as the reference (RS) is commonly used to estimate net survival (NS). However, cancer patients may face an increased risk of non-cancer death compared to cancer-free individuals. We evaluate the impact of considering this relative risk (RR) on NS estimation. First, we compared selected NS values to generated RS under various theoretical scenarios, considering different RR, NS, age at diagnosis, time since diagnosis, and sex. Then, differences between NS and RS for three cancers were analyzed from cure model based estimates using EUROCARE-6 data. We observed differences between RS and the true value of NS, larger for longer time since diagnosis, older patients and higher NS. For head and neck cancer, the smallest differences were for young female patients at 5 years from diagnosis (4%) and the highest (32%) for older patients. For colorectal cancer, differences were <7% for all ages, both sexes, and times since diagnosis and for breast cancer, differences were <5% except for older patients after 5 years. If RR>1, RS underestimates NS. Our findings aim to correctly interpret the differences between RS and NS, and contextualise the possible biases of assuming RS as a proxy for cancer-specific survival.

癌症幸存者额外的非癌症死亡风险对净生存估计的影响。
以一般人群为参照的相对生存期(RS)通常用于估算净生存期(NS)。然而,与没有癌症的人相比,癌症患者可能面临更高的非癌症死亡风险。我们评估了考虑这种相对风险(RR)对NS估计的影响。首先,我们将选择的NS值与不同理论情景下生成的RS值进行比较,考虑不同的RR、NS、诊断年龄、诊断后时间和性别。然后,根据基于治愈模型的估计,使用EUROCARE-6数据分析了三种癌症的NS和RS之间的差异。我们观察到RS与NS真实值的差异,诊断后时间越长,RS越大,患者年龄越大,NS越高。对于头颈癌,年轻女性患者在诊断后5年的差异最小(4%),而老年患者的差异最大(32%)。对于结直肠癌,差异为1,RS低估了NS。我们的研究结果旨在正确解释RS和NS之间的差异,并将假设RS作为癌症特异性生存指标的可能偏差置于背景中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American journal of epidemiology
American journal of epidemiology 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
4.00%
发文量
221
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Epidemiology is the oldest and one of the premier epidemiologic journals devoted to the publication of empirical research findings, opinion pieces, and methodological developments in the field of epidemiologic research. It is a peer-reviewed journal aimed at both fellow epidemiologists and those who use epidemiologic data, including public health workers and clinicians.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信