Public financing and spending on tertiary education: Implications for fiscal deficit, growth, and welfare

IF 0.7 4区 经济学 Q4 ECONOMICS
Bibaswan Chatterjee, Rolando A. Escobar-Posada, Goncalo Monteiro
{"title":"Public financing and spending on tertiary education: Implications for fiscal deficit, growth, and welfare","authors":"Bibaswan Chatterjee,&nbsp;Rolando A. Escobar-Posada,&nbsp;Goncalo Monteiro","doi":"10.1111/ijet.12425","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This paper explores the impact of fiscal policies on growth, welfare, and public deficits in tertiary education financing using a two-sector growth model. It evaluates trade-offs between public and private funding, comparing scenarios with and without budget deficit constraints. The results suggest that shifting to a user fee system can promote growth, but growth and welfare cannot be maximized simultaneously. For Colombia, increasing government spending on education, such as expanding infrastructure or hiring more teachers, improves welfare, while subsidies for user fees are ineffective. The study provides insights into the efficiency of mixed funding systems for higher education.</p>","PeriodicalId":44551,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Economic Theory","volume":"21 3","pages":"259-288"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Economic Theory","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijet.12425","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper explores the impact of fiscal policies on growth, welfare, and public deficits in tertiary education financing using a two-sector growth model. It evaluates trade-offs between public and private funding, comparing scenarios with and without budget deficit constraints. The results suggest that shifting to a user fee system can promote growth, but growth and welfare cannot be maximized simultaneously. For Colombia, increasing government spending on education, such as expanding infrastructure or hiring more teachers, improves welfare, while subsidies for user fees are ineffective. The study provides insights into the efficiency of mixed funding systems for higher education.

高等教育的公共融资和支出:对财政赤字、增长和福利的影响
本文利用两部门增长模型探讨了财政政策对高等教育融资中增长、福利和公共赤字的影响。它评估了公共和私人资金之间的权衡,比较了有和没有预算赤字限制的情况。结果表明,转向用户收费制度可以促进增长,但增长和福利不能同时最大化。对哥伦比亚来说,增加政府在教育方面的支出,如扩大基础设施或雇用更多教师,可以改善福利,而对用户费用的补贴是无效的。这项研究为高等教育混合资助系统的效率提供了见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信