Spatial variation in local population dynamics of sika deer, Cervus nippon, through intensified management

IF 1.9 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ECOLOGY
Mayumi Ueno, Hayato Iijima, Yoshihiro Inatomi, Saya Yamaguchi, Hino Takafumi, Hiroyuki Uno
{"title":"Spatial variation in local population dynamics of sika deer, Cervus nippon, through intensified management","authors":"Mayumi Ueno,&nbsp;Hayato Iijima,&nbsp;Yoshihiro Inatomi,&nbsp;Saya Yamaguchi,&nbsp;Hino Takafumi,&nbsp;Hiroyuki Uno","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.70069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Population reduction through hunting and nuisance control has been practiced in many parts of the world to prevent an overabundance of ungulates; however, there is limited knowledge regarding the quantitative impact of intensified hunting management and nuisance control on local dynamics within managed populations. This study examined spatial variations in the local dynamics of sika deer (<i>Cervus nippon</i>) along with hunting and nuisance control across 256 mesh units (23 km<sup>2</sup>/mesh unit) within the Kushiro subprefecture of Hokkaido, Japan, from 1994 to 2020 (27 years). Under enhanced management, the population declined twice but only by about 14% from the previous peak each time. Since 2017, however, the population has remained stable without further decline. Local densities ranged from 1 to 120 deer/km<sup>2</sup> within the area, with higher densities producing higher harvest rates (i.e., density-dependent harvesting). Temporal trends in local densities varied across the mesh units: in some mesh units, sika deer at a high density (≥50 deer/km<sup>2</sup>) consistently decreased by more than half, whereas in others, medium densities (25–50 deer/km<sup>2</sup>) increased following temporal fluctuations, and low densities (&lt;25 deer/km<sup>2</sup>) remained stable throughout the same period. Thus, the extent of human-induced population reduction locally differed and was likely larger at high-density mesh units. Consequently, the impact of intensified management at the prefecture scale varies locally. Therefore, allocating management efforts to high-density mesh units is preferable for more efficient population control across the entire area.</p>","PeriodicalId":17504,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Wildlife Management","volume":"89 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://wildlife.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jwmg.70069","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Wildlife Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://wildlife.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jwmg.70069","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Population reduction through hunting and nuisance control has been practiced in many parts of the world to prevent an overabundance of ungulates; however, there is limited knowledge regarding the quantitative impact of intensified hunting management and nuisance control on local dynamics within managed populations. This study examined spatial variations in the local dynamics of sika deer (Cervus nippon) along with hunting and nuisance control across 256 mesh units (23 km2/mesh unit) within the Kushiro subprefecture of Hokkaido, Japan, from 1994 to 2020 (27 years). Under enhanced management, the population declined twice but only by about 14% from the previous peak each time. Since 2017, however, the population has remained stable without further decline. Local densities ranged from 1 to 120 deer/km2 within the area, with higher densities producing higher harvest rates (i.e., density-dependent harvesting). Temporal trends in local densities varied across the mesh units: in some mesh units, sika deer at a high density (≥50 deer/km2) consistently decreased by more than half, whereas in others, medium densities (25–50 deer/km2) increased following temporal fluctuations, and low densities (<25 deer/km2) remained stable throughout the same period. Thus, the extent of human-induced population reduction locally differed and was likely larger at high-density mesh units. Consequently, the impact of intensified management at the prefecture scale varies locally. Therefore, allocating management efforts to high-density mesh units is preferable for more efficient population control across the entire area.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

强化管理下梅花鹿种群动态的空间变异
在世界上许多地方,通过狩猎和控制滋扰来减少人口,以防止有蹄类动物过多;然而,关于加强狩猎管理和滋扰控制对管理种群内当地动态的数量影响的知识有限。本研究调查了1994年至2020年(27年)日本北海道钏路县256个网格单元(23平方公里/网格单元)梅花鹿(Cervus nippon)本地动态的空间变化以及狩猎和滋扰控制。在加强管理的情况下,种群数量下降了两次,但每次都只比之前的峰值下降了约14%。然而,自2017年以来,大熊猫数量保持稳定,没有进一步下降。该地区的局部密度为1 ~ 120头/km2,密度越高收获率越高(即密度依赖性收获)。不同网格单元的局部密度随时间变化趋势不同:在一些网格单元中,高密度梅花鹿(≥50只/平方公里)持续减少一半以上,而在其他网格单元中,中等密度(25 - 50只/平方公里)在时间波动后增加,低密度(25只/平方公里)在同一时期保持稳定。因此,人类引起的种群减少程度在当地有所不同,在高密度网格单位可能更大。因此,在地级范围内加强管理的影响因地而异。因此,为了更有效地控制整个地区的人口,将管理工作分配给高密度网格单元是可取的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Wildlife Management
Journal of Wildlife Management 环境科学-动物学
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
13.00%
发文量
188
审稿时长
9-24 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Wildlife Management publishes manuscripts containing information from original research that contributes to basic wildlife science. Suitable topics include investigations into the biology and ecology of wildlife and their habitats that has direct or indirect implications for wildlife management and conservation. This includes basic information on wildlife habitat use, reproduction, genetics, demographics, viability, predator-prey relationships, space-use, movements, behavior, and physiology; but within the context of contemporary management and conservation issues such that the knowledge may ultimately be useful to wildlife practitioners. Also considered are theoretical and conceptual aspects of wildlife science, including development of new approaches to quantitative analyses, modeling of wildlife populations and habitats, and other topics that are germane to advancing wildlife science. Limited reviews or meta analyses will be considered if they provide a meaningful new synthesis or perspective on an appropriate subject. Direct evaluation of management practices or policies should be sent to the Wildlife Society Bulletin, as should papers reporting new tools or techniques. However, papers that report new tools or techniques, or effects of management practices, within the context of a broader study investigating basic wildlife biology and ecology will be considered by The Journal of Wildlife Management. Book reviews of relevant topics in basic wildlife research and biology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信