Vulnerable caribou and moose populations display varying responses to mountain pine beetle outbreaks and management

IF 1.9 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ECOLOGY
Laura L. Griffin, Laura Finnegan, Julie Duval, Simone Ciuti, Virginia Morera-Pujol, Haitao Li, A. Cole Burton
{"title":"Vulnerable caribou and moose populations display varying responses to mountain pine beetle outbreaks and management","authors":"Laura L. Griffin,&nbsp;Laura Finnegan,&nbsp;Julie Duval,&nbsp;Simone Ciuti,&nbsp;Virginia Morera-Pujol,&nbsp;Haitao Li,&nbsp;A. Cole Burton","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.70065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Rising global temperatures and changing landscape conditions have led to widespread mountain pine beetle (<i>Dendroctonus ponderosae</i>) outbreaks in western North America. Pine beetle management is typically implemented to mitigate economic losses, but its effects on wildlife, particularly ecologically important species like caribou (<i>Rangifer tarandus</i>) and moose (<i>Alces alces</i>), warrant greater attention. We assessed the effects of early-stage pine beetle infestation, timber harvest, and fire on habitat selection by caribou (boreal and central mountain designatable units) and moose in west-central Alberta, Canada. Using global positioning system (GPS) collar data collected 3–5 years after infestation, we developed resource selection functions and functional response models. Caribou exhibited seasonally variable responses, generally avoiding pine beetle-affected areas in winter but selecting them in summer. They also avoided harvested and burned areas, though this avoidance depended on overall disturbance levels within their ranges. Moose displayed sex-specific responses to pine beetle infestations and associated management: females avoided pine beetle-affected areas but selected burned sites year-round, while males showed the opposite pattern. These findings suggest that pine beetle disturbances may negatively affect caribou and female moose winter habitat availability while simultaneously enhancing conditions for male moose. Further research is needed to disentangle the individual and cumulative effects of pine beetle management actions versus general timber harvests and wildfires, as these disturbances may be compounding rather than acting in isolation.</p>","PeriodicalId":17504,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Wildlife Management","volume":"89 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://wildlife.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jwmg.70065","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Wildlife Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://wildlife.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jwmg.70065","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rising global temperatures and changing landscape conditions have led to widespread mountain pine beetle (Dendroctonus ponderosae) outbreaks in western North America. Pine beetle management is typically implemented to mitigate economic losses, but its effects on wildlife, particularly ecologically important species like caribou (Rangifer tarandus) and moose (Alces alces), warrant greater attention. We assessed the effects of early-stage pine beetle infestation, timber harvest, and fire on habitat selection by caribou (boreal and central mountain designatable units) and moose in west-central Alberta, Canada. Using global positioning system (GPS) collar data collected 3–5 years after infestation, we developed resource selection functions and functional response models. Caribou exhibited seasonally variable responses, generally avoiding pine beetle-affected areas in winter but selecting them in summer. They also avoided harvested and burned areas, though this avoidance depended on overall disturbance levels within their ranges. Moose displayed sex-specific responses to pine beetle infestations and associated management: females avoided pine beetle-affected areas but selected burned sites year-round, while males showed the opposite pattern. These findings suggest that pine beetle disturbances may negatively affect caribou and female moose winter habitat availability while simultaneously enhancing conditions for male moose. Further research is needed to disentangle the individual and cumulative effects of pine beetle management actions versus general timber harvests and wildfires, as these disturbances may be compounding rather than acting in isolation.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

脆弱的北美驯鹿和驼鹿种群对山松甲虫的爆发和管理表现出不同的反应
全球气温上升和景观条件变化导致北美西部大范围爆发山松甲虫。松甲虫管理通常是为了减轻经济损失,但它对野生动物的影响,特别是对生态上重要的物种,如北美驯鹿(Rangifer tarandus)和驼鹿(Alces Alces)的影响,值得更多的关注。研究了加拿大阿尔伯塔中西部地区早期松甲虫侵染、木材采伐和火灾对北美驯鹿(北部和中部山地可指定单位)和驼鹿栖息地选择的影响。利用侵染后3-5年的全球定位系统(GPS)项圈数据,构建资源选择函数和功能响应模型。驯鹿表现出不同季节的反应,一般在冬季避开松甲虫疫区,而在夏季选择松甲虫疫区。它们也会避开收获和烧毁的地区,尽管这种避开取决于它们活动范围内的总体干扰程度。驼鹿对松甲虫的侵扰和相关的管理表现出性别特异性的反应:雌性避开松甲虫影响的地区,但全年都选择烧伤的地方,而雄性则表现出相反的模式。这些发现表明,松甲虫的干扰可能会对北美驯鹿和雌性驼鹿的冬季栖息地产生负面影响,同时也会提高雄性驼鹿的生存条件。需要进一步的研究来解开松甲虫管理行动与一般木材采伐和野火的个体和累积影响,因为这些干扰可能是复合的,而不是孤立的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Wildlife Management
Journal of Wildlife Management 环境科学-动物学
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
13.00%
发文量
188
审稿时长
9-24 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Wildlife Management publishes manuscripts containing information from original research that contributes to basic wildlife science. Suitable topics include investigations into the biology and ecology of wildlife and their habitats that has direct or indirect implications for wildlife management and conservation. This includes basic information on wildlife habitat use, reproduction, genetics, demographics, viability, predator-prey relationships, space-use, movements, behavior, and physiology; but within the context of contemporary management and conservation issues such that the knowledge may ultimately be useful to wildlife practitioners. Also considered are theoretical and conceptual aspects of wildlife science, including development of new approaches to quantitative analyses, modeling of wildlife populations and habitats, and other topics that are germane to advancing wildlife science. Limited reviews or meta analyses will be considered if they provide a meaningful new synthesis or perspective on an appropriate subject. Direct evaluation of management practices or policies should be sent to the Wildlife Society Bulletin, as should papers reporting new tools or techniques. However, papers that report new tools or techniques, or effects of management practices, within the context of a broader study investigating basic wildlife biology and ecology will be considered by The Journal of Wildlife Management. Book reviews of relevant topics in basic wildlife research and biology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信