Comparative Insights Into the Degree of Conversion of a 3D-Printed Photopolymer Occlusal Splint Resin Fabricated by Stereolithography and Masked Stereolithography Compared to Heat-Polymerized Acrylics

IF 4.6 3区 材料科学 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Izim Turker Kader, Yurdanur Ucar, Pinar Kursoglu
{"title":"Comparative Insights Into the Degree of Conversion of a 3D-Printed Photopolymer Occlusal Splint Resin Fabricated by Stereolithography and Masked Stereolithography Compared to Heat-Polymerized Acrylics","authors":"Izim Turker Kader,&nbsp;Yurdanur Ucar,&nbsp;Pinar Kursoglu","doi":"10.1002/mame.202500185","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The degree of conversion (DC) is a critical determinant of the biocompatibility and long-term performance of occlusal splints. However, limited evidence exists on how emerging three-dimensional printing technologies, particularly masked stereolithography (MSLA), affect polymerization efficiency compared to established methods. This study investigated the DC of a photopolymer-based occlusal splint resin fabricated using stereolithography (SLA) and MSLA technologies, compared to a conventional heat-polymerized acrylic resin. DC was assessed by Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR) at three stages for printed specimens: the unpolymerized resin, after printing and washing (DC Print), and after post-curing (final DC). The difference between DC Print and final DC (ΔDC) represented the contribution of the post-curing step. Conventional specimens were evaluated after mixing and after polymerization. The final DC of the conventional group was significantly higher than both SLA and MSLA groups (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), although SLA and MSLA did not differ significantly (<i>p</i> &gt; 0.05). Post-curing significantly enhanced polymerization in both printed groups. MSLA printing achieved comparable DC to SLA while reducing production time. These findings support MSLA as a promising and time-efficient method for splint fabrication, though further improvements in resin formulation and post-curing protocols are warranted to match the polymerization efficiency of conventional heat-polymerized acrylics.</p>","PeriodicalId":18151,"journal":{"name":"Macromolecular Materials and Engineering","volume":"310 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/mame.202500185","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Macromolecular Materials and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mame.202500185","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The degree of conversion (DC) is a critical determinant of the biocompatibility and long-term performance of occlusal splints. However, limited evidence exists on how emerging three-dimensional printing technologies, particularly masked stereolithography (MSLA), affect polymerization efficiency compared to established methods. This study investigated the DC of a photopolymer-based occlusal splint resin fabricated using stereolithography (SLA) and MSLA technologies, compared to a conventional heat-polymerized acrylic resin. DC was assessed by Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR) at three stages for printed specimens: the unpolymerized resin, after printing and washing (DC Print), and after post-curing (final DC). The difference between DC Print and final DC (ΔDC) represented the contribution of the post-curing step. Conventional specimens were evaluated after mixing and after polymerization. The final DC of the conventional group was significantly higher than both SLA and MSLA groups (p < 0.001), although SLA and MSLA did not differ significantly (p > 0.05). Post-curing significantly enhanced polymerization in both printed groups. MSLA printing achieved comparable DC to SLA while reducing production time. These findings support MSLA as a promising and time-efficient method for splint fabrication, though further improvements in resin formulation and post-curing protocols are warranted to match the polymerization efficiency of conventional heat-polymerized acrylics.

Abstract Image

立体光刻和掩膜立体光刻制备的3d打印光聚合物咬合夹板树脂与热聚合丙烯酸树脂转化程度的比较研究
转换度(DC)是决定咬合夹板生物相容性和长期性能的关键因素。然而,与现有方法相比,新兴的三维印刷技术,特别是掩膜立体光刻(MSLA)如何影响聚合效率的证据有限。本研究研究了采用立体光刻(SLA)和MSLA技术制备的光聚合物基咬合夹板树脂的DC,并与传统的热聚合丙烯酸树脂进行了比较。通过傅里叶变换红外光谱(FTIR)对打印样品进行三个阶段的DC评估:未聚合树脂、打印和洗涤后(DC Print)和固化后(最终DC)。DC Print和最终DC (ΔDC)之间的差异代表了固化后步骤的贡献。常规样品在混合和聚合后进行评估。常规组的最终DC显著高于SLA和MSLA组(p < 0.001),但SLA和MSLA组无显著差异(p > 0.05)。固化后显著增强了两个印刷组的聚合。MSLA印刷在减少生产时间的同时实现了与SLA相当的DC。这些发现支持MSLA作为一种有前途的、时间效率高的夹板制造方法,尽管需要进一步改进树脂配方和固化后方案,以匹配传统热聚合丙烯酸树脂的聚合效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Macromolecular Materials and Engineering
Macromolecular Materials and Engineering 工程技术-材料科学:综合
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
5.10%
发文量
328
审稿时长
1.6 months
期刊介绍: Macromolecular Materials and Engineering is the high-quality polymer science journal dedicated to the design, modification, characterization, processing and application of advanced polymeric materials, including membranes, sensors, sustainability, composites, fibers, foams, 3D printing, actuators as well as energy and electronic applications. Macromolecular Materials and Engineering is among the top journals publishing original research in polymer science. The journal presents strictly peer-reviewed Research Articles, Reviews, Perspectives and Comments. ISSN: 1438-7492 (print). 1439-2054 (online). Readership:Polymer scientists, chemists, physicists, materials scientists, engineers Abstracting and Indexing Information: CAS: Chemical Abstracts Service (ACS) CCR Database (Clarivate Analytics) Chemical Abstracts Service/SciFinder (ACS) Chemistry Server Reaction Center (Clarivate Analytics) ChemWeb (ChemIndustry.com) Chimica Database (Elsevier) COMPENDEX (Elsevier) Current Contents: Physical, Chemical & Earth Sciences (Clarivate Analytics) Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) INSPEC (IET) Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition (Clarivate Analytics) Materials Science & Engineering Database (ProQuest) PASCAL Database (INIST/CNRS) Polymer Library (iSmithers RAPRA) Reaction Citation Index (Clarivate Analytics) Science Citation Index (Clarivate Analytics) Science Citation Index Expanded (Clarivate Analytics) SciTech Premium Collection (ProQuest) SCOPUS (Elsevier) Technology Collection (ProQuest) Web of Science (Clarivate Analytics)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信