Juan Martín Gómez Penedo, Malenka Areas, Cristoph Flückiger
{"title":"Interpersonal Distress as a Covariate of Mental Health in Depression: A Multilevel Meta-Analysis","authors":"Juan Martín Gómez Penedo, Malenka Areas, Cristoph Flückiger","doi":"10.1002/cpp.70143","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Although empirical studies have shown that interpersonal distress is related to mental health indicators in depression, there are no previous meta-analyses evaluating this association. We performed a systematic review and meta-analytic study to estimate the association between interpersonal distress and non-relational mental health indicators (NR-MHI) in depression. Following PRISMA criteria, we performed a systematic search on PubMed and PsycINFO. We conducted multilevel meta-analytic (i.e., random-effects) models to estimate a pooled correlation coefficient representing the strength of the association between interpersonal distress and NR-MHI. Thirty-eight studies (reporting 88 effect sizes) met inclusion criteria. The models showed a significant correlation between interpersonal distress and NR-MHI (<i>r</i> = 0.41, <i>p</i> < 0.001), with moderate heterogeneity, Q(87) = 710.38, <i>p</i> < 0.001. A funnel plot did not present evidence of publication bias. We found no significant moderation effects of specific depressive diagnoses, type of study or levels of interpersonal distress. This study is the first to report a meta-analytic synthesis of the association between interpersonal distress and NR-MHI in depression, showing that in individuals with depression, NR-MHI was positively associated with interpersonal distress, presenting a medium-to-large pooled effect size.</p>","PeriodicalId":10460,"journal":{"name":"Clinical psychology & psychotherapy","volume":"32 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cpp.70143","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical psychology & psychotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cpp.70143","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Although empirical studies have shown that interpersonal distress is related to mental health indicators in depression, there are no previous meta-analyses evaluating this association. We performed a systematic review and meta-analytic study to estimate the association between interpersonal distress and non-relational mental health indicators (NR-MHI) in depression. Following PRISMA criteria, we performed a systematic search on PubMed and PsycINFO. We conducted multilevel meta-analytic (i.e., random-effects) models to estimate a pooled correlation coefficient representing the strength of the association between interpersonal distress and NR-MHI. Thirty-eight studies (reporting 88 effect sizes) met inclusion criteria. The models showed a significant correlation between interpersonal distress and NR-MHI (r = 0.41, p < 0.001), with moderate heterogeneity, Q(87) = 710.38, p < 0.001. A funnel plot did not present evidence of publication bias. We found no significant moderation effects of specific depressive diagnoses, type of study or levels of interpersonal distress. This study is the first to report a meta-analytic synthesis of the association between interpersonal distress and NR-MHI in depression, showing that in individuals with depression, NR-MHI was positively associated with interpersonal distress, presenting a medium-to-large pooled effect size.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy aims to keep clinical psychologists and psychotherapists up to date with new developments in their fields. The Journal will provide an integrative impetus both between theory and practice and between different orientations within clinical psychology and psychotherapy. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy will be a forum in which practitioners can present their wealth of expertise and innovations in order to make these available to a wider audience. Equally, the Journal will contain reports from researchers who want to address a larger clinical audience with clinically relevant issues and clinically valid research.