Interpersonal Distress as a Covariate of Mental Health in Depression: A Multilevel Meta-Analysis

IF 2.7 3区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Juan Martín Gómez Penedo, Malenka Areas, Cristoph Flückiger
{"title":"Interpersonal Distress as a Covariate of Mental Health in Depression: A Multilevel Meta-Analysis","authors":"Juan Martín Gómez Penedo,&nbsp;Malenka Areas,&nbsp;Cristoph Flückiger","doi":"10.1002/cpp.70143","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Although empirical studies have shown that interpersonal distress is related to mental health indicators in depression, there are no previous meta-analyses evaluating this association. We performed a systematic review and meta-analytic study to estimate the association between interpersonal distress and non-relational mental health indicators (NR-MHI) in depression. Following PRISMA criteria, we performed a systematic search on PubMed and PsycINFO. We conducted multilevel meta-analytic (i.e., random-effects) models to estimate a pooled correlation coefficient representing the strength of the association between interpersonal distress and NR-MHI. Thirty-eight studies (reporting 88 effect sizes) met inclusion criteria. The models showed a significant correlation between interpersonal distress and NR-MHI (<i>r</i> = 0.41, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), with moderate heterogeneity, Q(87) = 710.38, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001. A funnel plot did not present evidence of publication bias. We found no significant moderation effects of specific depressive diagnoses, type of study or levels of interpersonal distress. This study is the first to report a meta-analytic synthesis of the association between interpersonal distress and NR-MHI in depression, showing that in individuals with depression, NR-MHI was positively associated with interpersonal distress, presenting a medium-to-large pooled effect size.</p>","PeriodicalId":10460,"journal":{"name":"Clinical psychology & psychotherapy","volume":"32 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cpp.70143","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical psychology & psychotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cpp.70143","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although empirical studies have shown that interpersonal distress is related to mental health indicators in depression, there are no previous meta-analyses evaluating this association. We performed a systematic review and meta-analytic study to estimate the association between interpersonal distress and non-relational mental health indicators (NR-MHI) in depression. Following PRISMA criteria, we performed a systematic search on PubMed and PsycINFO. We conducted multilevel meta-analytic (i.e., random-effects) models to estimate a pooled correlation coefficient representing the strength of the association between interpersonal distress and NR-MHI. Thirty-eight studies (reporting 88 effect sizes) met inclusion criteria. The models showed a significant correlation between interpersonal distress and NR-MHI (r = 0.41, p < 0.001), with moderate heterogeneity, Q(87) = 710.38, p < 0.001. A funnel plot did not present evidence of publication bias. We found no significant moderation effects of specific depressive diagnoses, type of study or levels of interpersonal distress. This study is the first to report a meta-analytic synthesis of the association between interpersonal distress and NR-MHI in depression, showing that in individuals with depression, NR-MHI was positively associated with interpersonal distress, presenting a medium-to-large pooled effect size.

Abstract Image

人际困扰作为抑郁症心理健康的协变量:一项多水平荟萃分析
虽然已有实证研究表明人际困扰与抑郁症患者的心理健康指标相关,但尚无meta分析对这种关联进行评估。我们进行了一项系统回顾和荟萃分析研究,以估计抑郁症中人际困扰与非关系性心理健康指标(NR-MHI)之间的关系。按照PRISMA的标准,我们在PubMed和PsycINFO上进行了系统的搜索。我们进行了多水平荟萃分析(即随机效应)模型,以估计代表人际困扰与NR-MHI之间关联强度的综合相关系数。38项研究(报告88个效应量)符合纳入标准。模型显示人际困扰与NR-MHI之间存在显著相关(r = 0.41, p < 0.001),且存在中等异质性,Q(87) = 710.38, p < 0.001。漏斗图没有显示发表偏倚的证据。我们发现特定的抑郁诊断、研究类型或人际困扰水平没有显著的调节作用。本研究首次报道了抑郁症患者人际困扰与NR-MHI之间关系的综合meta分析,结果表明,在抑郁症患者中,NR-MHI与人际困扰呈正相关,呈现出中到大的综合效应量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical psychology & psychotherapy
Clinical psychology & psychotherapy PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
5.60%
发文量
106
期刊介绍: Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy aims to keep clinical psychologists and psychotherapists up to date with new developments in their fields. The Journal will provide an integrative impetus both between theory and practice and between different orientations within clinical psychology and psychotherapy. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy will be a forum in which practitioners can present their wealth of expertise and innovations in order to make these available to a wider audience. Equally, the Journal will contain reports from researchers who want to address a larger clinical audience with clinically relevant issues and clinically valid research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信