Connecting With Others: Diversity Training Shapes Egalitarian Orientations

IF 4.7 1区 社会学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL
Ivuoma N. Onyeador, Katie Duchscherer, Cydney H. Dupree, John F. Dovidio
{"title":"Connecting With Others: Diversity Training Shapes Egalitarian Orientations","authors":"Ivuoma N. Onyeador,&nbsp;Katie Duchscherer,&nbsp;Cydney H. Dupree,&nbsp;John F. Dovidio","doi":"10.1111/josi.70013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Despite considerable resources invested in diversity training, there has been a paucity of studies that examine the enduring impact of diversity training. The current study was conducted in a workplace setting and is a quasi-experimental empirical evaluation of a widely used diversity training program that includes a daylong workshop and 8 weeks of structured interracial interactions. We examined the effects of this program on diversity-relevant outcomes—motivational, ideological, and attitudinal—over 2 months later. Although the program features content and assigns activities intended to reduce social biases in general, this examination focuses on biases toward Black Americans. In a pre-test/post-test analysis of employees who participated in training, we found that participants reported a significantly lower social dominance orientation (SDO) and significantly more motivation to be nonprejudiced 2 months after the training compared to before. Converging results were observed such that employees who participated in the training program exhibited significantly lower SDO and exhibited marginally higher internal motivation to respond without prejudice compared to employees in a control group who did not participate. No differences were observed for explicit attitudes, implicit bias, or right-wing authoritarianism (RWA). The current study thus documents that diversity interventions administered in “real-world” contexts can have a relatively long-term impact on egalitarian orientations. The research also highlights the need for further investigation of how specific elements of the program (e.g., the training itself, the nature, and duration of interracial contact exercises), and the way they are implemented, may or may not affect different outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":17008,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Social Issues","volume":"81 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://spssi.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/josi.70013","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Social Issues","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://spssi.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/josi.70013","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite considerable resources invested in diversity training, there has been a paucity of studies that examine the enduring impact of diversity training. The current study was conducted in a workplace setting and is a quasi-experimental empirical evaluation of a widely used diversity training program that includes a daylong workshop and 8 weeks of structured interracial interactions. We examined the effects of this program on diversity-relevant outcomes—motivational, ideological, and attitudinal—over 2 months later. Although the program features content and assigns activities intended to reduce social biases in general, this examination focuses on biases toward Black Americans. In a pre-test/post-test analysis of employees who participated in training, we found that participants reported a significantly lower social dominance orientation (SDO) and significantly more motivation to be nonprejudiced 2 months after the training compared to before. Converging results were observed such that employees who participated in the training program exhibited significantly lower SDO and exhibited marginally higher internal motivation to respond without prejudice compared to employees in a control group who did not participate. No differences were observed for explicit attitudes, implicit bias, or right-wing authoritarianism (RWA). The current study thus documents that diversity interventions administered in “real-world” contexts can have a relatively long-term impact on egalitarian orientations. The research also highlights the need for further investigation of how specific elements of the program (e.g., the training itself, the nature, and duration of interracial contact exercises), and the way they are implemented, may or may not affect different outcomes.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

与他人联系:多样性训练塑造平等主义取向
尽管在多元化培训方面投入了大量资源,但研究多元化培训的持久影响的研究却很少。目前的研究是在工作场所进行的,是对广泛使用的多元化培训计划的准实验经验评估,该计划包括为期一天的研讨会和8周的结构化跨种族互动。我们在两个月后检查了这个项目对多样性相关结果的影响——动机、意识形态和态度。虽然该计划的特色内容和活动旨在减少社会偏见,但本次考试的重点是对美国黑人的偏见。通过对参加培训的员工进行测试前/测试后的分析,我们发现,在培训后2个月,参与者的社会支配倾向(SDO)显著降低,无偏见动机显著增强。我们观察到趋同的结果,参加培训计划的员工表现出明显较低的SDO,而与没有参加培训计划的对照组员工相比,他们表现出略高的无偏见回应的内部动机。在外显态度、内隐偏见或右翼威权主义(RWA)方面没有观察到差异。因此,目前的研究证明,在“现实世界”背景下实施的多样性干预可以对平等主义取向产生相对长期的影响。该研究还强调,需要进一步调查该计划的具体要素(例如,训练本身、种族间接触练习的性质和持续时间)以及它们的实施方式,可能会或不会影响不同的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
73
期刊介绍: Published for The Society for the Psychological Study of Social Issues (SPSSI), the Journal of Social Issues (JSI) brings behavioral and social science theory, empirical evidence, and practice to bear on human and social problems. Each issue of the journal focuses on a single topic - recent issues, for example, have addressed poverty, housing and health; privacy as a social and psychological concern; youth and violence; and the impact of social class on education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信