{"title":"Decentralization, Blockchain, Artificial Intelligence (AI): Challenges and Opportunities","authors":"Xiang Hui, Catherine Tucker","doi":"10.1111/jpim.12800","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>New technologies like blockchain allow firms to decentralize core functions, forcing managers to reconsider the trade-off between closed, proprietary control and open strategies that involve external contributors. While proponents often advocate for full decentralization, we argue this view overlooks important economic trade-offs. We propose that the better strategy is <i>selective decentralization</i>: a disciplined approach to choosing where to centralize for efficiency and where to decentralize for innovation. We propose a three-level framework—<i>Infrastructure</i>, <i>Decision-Making</i>, and <i>Operational Control</i>—to guide this choice, helping managers analyze the specific costs and benefits at each layer. We apply this framework to the strategic adoption of Artificial Intelligence (AI), where the technology's powerful pull toward centralization provides a stark test case. Our analysis shows that an “open source AI” strategy—decentralizing operations to foster innovation while keeping infrastructure centralized for efficiency—is more pragmatic than full decentralization. Selective decentralization therefore emerges as a key managerial capability for capturing blockchain's benefits without sacrificing scale efficiencies.</p>","PeriodicalId":16900,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Product Innovation Management","volume":"42 5","pages":"947-957"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jpim.12800","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Product Innovation Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jpim.12800","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
New technologies like blockchain allow firms to decentralize core functions, forcing managers to reconsider the trade-off between closed, proprietary control and open strategies that involve external contributors. While proponents often advocate for full decentralization, we argue this view overlooks important economic trade-offs. We propose that the better strategy is selective decentralization: a disciplined approach to choosing where to centralize for efficiency and where to decentralize for innovation. We propose a three-level framework—Infrastructure, Decision-Making, and Operational Control—to guide this choice, helping managers analyze the specific costs and benefits at each layer. We apply this framework to the strategic adoption of Artificial Intelligence (AI), where the technology's powerful pull toward centralization provides a stark test case. Our analysis shows that an “open source AI” strategy—decentralizing operations to foster innovation while keeping infrastructure centralized for efficiency—is more pragmatic than full decentralization. Selective decentralization therefore emerges as a key managerial capability for capturing blockchain's benefits without sacrificing scale efficiencies.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Product Innovation Management is a leading academic journal focused on research, theory, and practice in innovation and new product development. It covers a broad scope of issues crucial to successful innovation in both external and internal organizational environments. The journal aims to inform, provoke thought, and contribute to the knowledge and practice of new product development and innovation management. It welcomes original articles from organizations of all sizes and domains, including start-ups, small to medium-sized enterprises, and large corporations, as well as from consumer, business-to-business, and policy domains. The journal accepts various quantitative and qualitative methodologies, and authors from diverse disciplines and functional perspectives are encouraged to submit their work.