Decentralization, Blockchain, Artificial Intelligence (AI): Challenges and Opportunities

IF 8 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Xiang Hui, Catherine Tucker
{"title":"Decentralization, Blockchain, Artificial Intelligence (AI): Challenges and Opportunities","authors":"Xiang Hui,&nbsp;Catherine Tucker","doi":"10.1111/jpim.12800","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>New technologies like blockchain allow firms to decentralize core functions, forcing managers to reconsider the trade-off between closed, proprietary control and open strategies that involve external contributors. While proponents often advocate for full decentralization, we argue this view overlooks important economic trade-offs. We propose that the better strategy is <i>selective decentralization</i>: a disciplined approach to choosing where to centralize for efficiency and where to decentralize for innovation. We propose a three-level framework—<i>Infrastructure</i>, <i>Decision-Making</i>, and <i>Operational Control</i>—to guide this choice, helping managers analyze the specific costs and benefits at each layer. We apply this framework to the strategic adoption of Artificial Intelligence (AI), where the technology's powerful pull toward centralization provides a stark test case. Our analysis shows that an “open source AI” strategy—decentralizing operations to foster innovation while keeping infrastructure centralized for efficiency—is more pragmatic than full decentralization. Selective decentralization therefore emerges as a key managerial capability for capturing blockchain's benefits without sacrificing scale efficiencies.</p>","PeriodicalId":16900,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Product Innovation Management","volume":"42 5","pages":"947-957"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jpim.12800","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Product Innovation Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jpim.12800","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

New technologies like blockchain allow firms to decentralize core functions, forcing managers to reconsider the trade-off between closed, proprietary control and open strategies that involve external contributors. While proponents often advocate for full decentralization, we argue this view overlooks important economic trade-offs. We propose that the better strategy is selective decentralization: a disciplined approach to choosing where to centralize for efficiency and where to decentralize for innovation. We propose a three-level framework—Infrastructure, Decision-Making, and Operational Control—to guide this choice, helping managers analyze the specific costs and benefits at each layer. We apply this framework to the strategic adoption of Artificial Intelligence (AI), where the technology's powerful pull toward centralization provides a stark test case. Our analysis shows that an “open source AI” strategy—decentralizing operations to foster innovation while keeping infrastructure centralized for efficiency—is more pragmatic than full decentralization. Selective decentralization therefore emerges as a key managerial capability for capturing blockchain's benefits without sacrificing scale efficiencies.

去中心化、区块链、人工智能(AI):挑战与机遇
区块链等新技术允许公司分散核心职能,迫使管理人员重新考虑在封闭的专有控制和涉及外部贡献者的开放策略之间进行权衡。虽然支持者经常提倡完全的权力下放,但我们认为这种观点忽视了重要的经济权衡。我们建议,更好的策略是选择性去中心化:一种有纪律的方法来选择在哪里集中以提高效率,在哪里分散以促进创新。我们提出了一个三层框架——基础设施、决策和运营控制——来指导这种选择,帮助管理者分析每一层的具体成本和收益。我们将这一框架应用于人工智能(AI)的战略采用,该技术对集中化的强大吸引力提供了一个严峻的测试案例。我们的分析表明,“开源人工智能”战略——分散运营以促进创新,同时保持基础设施的集中化以提高效率——比完全分散更务实。因此,选择性去中心化成为一种关键的管理能力,可以在不牺牲规模效率的情况下获得区块链的利益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Product Innovation Management
Journal of Product Innovation Management 管理科学-工程:工业
CiteScore
17.00
自引率
5.70%
发文量
42
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Product Innovation Management is a leading academic journal focused on research, theory, and practice in innovation and new product development. It covers a broad scope of issues crucial to successful innovation in both external and internal organizational environments. The journal aims to inform, provoke thought, and contribute to the knowledge and practice of new product development and innovation management. It welcomes original articles from organizations of all sizes and domains, including start-ups, small to medium-sized enterprises, and large corporations, as well as from consumer, business-to-business, and policy domains. The journal accepts various quantitative and qualitative methodologies, and authors from diverse disciplines and functional perspectives are encouraged to submit their work.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信