Influence of drainage conditions and monotonic preloadings on the monotonic behavior of Karlsruhe fine sand

IF 5.7 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL
N. Irani, J. Duque, M. Tafili, D. Mašín, T. Wichtmann
{"title":"Influence of drainage conditions and monotonic preloadings on the monotonic behavior of Karlsruhe fine sand","authors":"N. Irani,&nbsp;J. Duque,&nbsp;M. Tafili,&nbsp;D. Mašín,&nbsp;T. Wichtmann","doi":"10.1007/s11440-025-02599-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This article presents the results of an experimental program aimed at evaluating the difference between undrained and drained maximum mobilized friction angles at identical initial densities and initial mean effective stress states, as well as the influence of monotonic preloadings on the monotonic behavior of Karlsruhe fine sand. For this purpose, a series of monotonic triaxial tests was performed considering different initial densities, preloading types and drainage conditions, such as drained, undrained and combinations of these within the same test. The experimental results suggest that under triaxial conditions, the drained maximum mobilized friction angle is up to <span>\\(10^{\\circ }\\)</span> larger than the corresponding undrained maximum mobilized friction angle. Furthermore, the results reveal that monotonic drained preloadings lead to significant differences in the subsequent undrained monotonic response. The capabilities of two advanced constitutive models for sands to reproduce the experimental observations were evaluated. With this aim, the models were calibrated using conventional monotonic and cyclic triaxial tests. Without any parameter adjustments, the model predictions were then inspected for samples subjected to monotonic preloading or shearing under different drainage conditions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49308,"journal":{"name":"Acta Geotechnica","volume":"20 9","pages":"4369 - 4383"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11440-025-02599-7.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Geotechnica","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11440-025-02599-7","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article presents the results of an experimental program aimed at evaluating the difference between undrained and drained maximum mobilized friction angles at identical initial densities and initial mean effective stress states, as well as the influence of monotonic preloadings on the monotonic behavior of Karlsruhe fine sand. For this purpose, a series of monotonic triaxial tests was performed considering different initial densities, preloading types and drainage conditions, such as drained, undrained and combinations of these within the same test. The experimental results suggest that under triaxial conditions, the drained maximum mobilized friction angle is up to \(10^{\circ }\) larger than the corresponding undrained maximum mobilized friction angle. Furthermore, the results reveal that monotonic drained preloadings lead to significant differences in the subsequent undrained monotonic response. The capabilities of two advanced constitutive models for sands to reproduce the experimental observations were evaluated. With this aim, the models were calibrated using conventional monotonic and cyclic triaxial tests. Without any parameter adjustments, the model predictions were then inspected for samples subjected to monotonic preloading or shearing under different drainage conditions.

排水条件和单调预压对卡尔斯鲁厄细砂单调特性的影响
本文介绍了一个实验程序的结果,旨在评估在相同的初始密度和初始平均有效应力状态下,不排水和排水的最大动员摩擦角之间的差异,以及单调预压对卡尔斯鲁厄细砂单调行为的影响。为此,进行了一系列单调三轴试验,在同一试验中考虑了不同的初始密度、预压类型和排水条件,如排水、不排水以及这些条件的组合。实验结果表明:三轴工况下,排水最大动员摩擦角比相应的不排水最大动员摩擦角大\(10^{\circ }\);此外,研究结果表明,单调排水预加载导致后续不排水单调响应的显著差异。评估了两种先进的砂本构模型再现实验观察结果的能力。为此,使用常规单调和循环三轴试验对模型进行了校准。在没有任何参数调整的情况下,对不同排水条件下的单调预压或剪切试样进行了模型预测检验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Geotechnica
Acta Geotechnica ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL-
CiteScore
9.90
自引率
17.50%
发文量
297
审稿时长
4 months
期刊介绍: Acta Geotechnica is an international journal devoted to the publication and dissemination of basic and applied research in geoengineering – an interdisciplinary field dealing with geomaterials such as soils and rocks. Coverage emphasizes the interplay between geomechanical models and their engineering applications. The journal presents original research papers on fundamental concepts in geomechanics and their novel applications in geoengineering based on experimental, analytical and/or numerical approaches. The main purpose of the journal is to foster understanding of the fundamental mechanisms behind the phenomena and processes in geomaterials, from kilometer-scale problems as they occur in geoscience, and down to the nano-scale, with their potential impact on geoengineering. The journal strives to report and archive progress in the field in a timely manner, presenting research papers, review articles, short notes and letters to the editors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信