Mechanism-based modeling for interface mechanical behavior during shearing

IF 5.7 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL
Mengtao Xu, Lizhong Wang, Ze Chen, Shihong Zhang, Zhen Guo
{"title":"Mechanism-based modeling for interface mechanical behavior during shearing","authors":"Mengtao Xu,&nbsp;Lizhong Wang,&nbsp;Ze Chen,&nbsp;Shihong Zhang,&nbsp;Zhen Guo","doi":"10.1007/s11440-025-02700-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Offshore structures exposed to prolonged cyclic loading necessitate a precise assessment of the soil–structure interface mechanical behavior. This study, building on cyclic shear tests at silty sand–steel and gravelly soil–structure interfaces, offers a comparative analysis of strength characteristic, deformation response, and physical-state evolution. Drawing from those, a well-verified mechanism-based interface modeling is formulated. The findings indicate that the shear strength at both interfaces can be uniformly characterized by the Mohr–Coulomb failure criterion. The interface elastic behavior, plastic shear strain, and compression-induced plastic volumetric strain can be effectively modeled within a unified framework. The shear-induced volumetric strain involves the cumulative and cyclic components, while the cumulative volumetric strain at both interfaces accumulates rapidly at the onset, with its rate diminishing as the cycles progress. Regarding cyclic volumetric strain, double-phase transformation points per cycle were observed at the silty sand–steel interface, whereas only single at the gravelly soil–structure interface, highlighting the influence of interface contact properties. Employing parameters calibrated from the interface shear test under constant normal load condition and confining compression test, the proposed model effectively simulates the interface strength and deformation responses under both constant normal stiffness and constant volume conditions, demonstrating the independence of interface mechanical modeling parameters from boundary conditions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49308,"journal":{"name":"Acta Geotechnica","volume":"20 9","pages":"4735 - 4754"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Geotechnica","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11440-025-02700-0","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Offshore structures exposed to prolonged cyclic loading necessitate a precise assessment of the soil–structure interface mechanical behavior. This study, building on cyclic shear tests at silty sand–steel and gravelly soil–structure interfaces, offers a comparative analysis of strength characteristic, deformation response, and physical-state evolution. Drawing from those, a well-verified mechanism-based interface modeling is formulated. The findings indicate that the shear strength at both interfaces can be uniformly characterized by the Mohr–Coulomb failure criterion. The interface elastic behavior, plastic shear strain, and compression-induced plastic volumetric strain can be effectively modeled within a unified framework. The shear-induced volumetric strain involves the cumulative and cyclic components, while the cumulative volumetric strain at both interfaces accumulates rapidly at the onset, with its rate diminishing as the cycles progress. Regarding cyclic volumetric strain, double-phase transformation points per cycle were observed at the silty sand–steel interface, whereas only single at the gravelly soil–structure interface, highlighting the influence of interface contact properties. Employing parameters calibrated from the interface shear test under constant normal load condition and confining compression test, the proposed model effectively simulates the interface strength and deformation responses under both constant normal stiffness and constant volume conditions, demonstrating the independence of interface mechanical modeling parameters from boundary conditions.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

基于力学的剪切界面力学行为建模
长期循环荷载作用下的海上结构需要对土-结构界面力学性能进行精确的评估。本研究基于粉砂-钢和砾石-土-结构界面的循环剪切试验,对强度特征、变形响应和物理状态演变进行了对比分析。在此基础上,建立了一个经过验证的基于机理的界面模型。研究结果表明,两个界面的抗剪强度可以用Mohr-Coulomb破坏准则统一表征。界面弹性行为、塑性剪切应变和压缩诱发的塑性体积应变可以在一个统一的框架内有效地建模。剪切诱发的体积应变包括累积分量和循环分量,两个界面的累积体积应变在开始时积累迅速,随着循环的进行,其速率逐渐减小。对于循环体积应变,粉质砂-钢界面每循环出现两个相变点,而砂土-结构界面每循环只有一个相变点,这突出了界面接触特性的影响。该模型采用恒法向载荷条件下的界面剪切试验和围压试验标定的参数,有效模拟了恒法向刚度和恒体积条件下的界面强度和变形响应,证明了界面力学建模参数与边界条件的独立性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Geotechnica
Acta Geotechnica ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL-
CiteScore
9.90
自引率
17.50%
发文量
297
审稿时长
4 months
期刊介绍: Acta Geotechnica is an international journal devoted to the publication and dissemination of basic and applied research in geoengineering – an interdisciplinary field dealing with geomaterials such as soils and rocks. Coverage emphasizes the interplay between geomechanical models and their engineering applications. The journal presents original research papers on fundamental concepts in geomechanics and their novel applications in geoengineering based on experimental, analytical and/or numerical approaches. The main purpose of the journal is to foster understanding of the fundamental mechanisms behind the phenomena and processes in geomaterials, from kilometer-scale problems as they occur in geoscience, and down to the nano-scale, with their potential impact on geoengineering. The journal strives to report and archive progress in the field in a timely manner, presenting research papers, review articles, short notes and letters to the editors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信