Madiha Bencekri, Juhyeon Kwak, Sion Kim, Minje Choi, Juho Lee, Jongwon Lee, Seungjae Lee
{"title":"Spatial determinants of mental health in Seoul: Cycling, income inequality, and access to care","authors":"Madiha Bencekri, Juhyeon Kwak, Sion Kim, Minje Choi, Juho Lee, Jongwon Lee, Seungjae Lee","doi":"10.1016/j.tranpol.2025.103770","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>As cities face growing mental health challenges, the role of transport infrastructure in shaping psychological wellbeing remains underexplored. This study investigated how cycling accessibility, mental healthcare provision, and income inequality jointly influence the spatial distribution of severe mental health outcomes in Seoul. Employing a three-stage spatial framework, Geographically Weighted Regression (GWR), Random Forest (RF), and Suitability Analysis (SA), this study assessed the spatial heterogeneity, nonlinear interactions, and district-level intervention priorities. Results from GWR indicate that cycling infrastructure is the most consistent spatial predictor of mental health disparities, with coefficients as high as 0.81 in districts like Gangnam-gu. Healthcare access and income inequality show more localised yet significant associations. RF modelling confirmed these patterns, ranking healthcare (36 %), cycling accessibility (33 %), and income inequality (31 %) as primary contributors. SA highlights districts such as Songpa-gu and Gangnam-gu as high-priority areas for integrated transportation and public health interventions. Anomalies such as Gangseo-gu, where high vulnerability coexists with low model fit, underscore the need for further localised investigation. By integrating spatial analytics with transport equity and health policy perspectives, this study provides a scalable framework for mental health sensitive infrastructure planning. It positions cycling not only as a sustainable mobility solution but also as a key policy lever for advancing urban health equity.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48378,"journal":{"name":"Transport Policy","volume":"172 ","pages":"Article 103770"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transport Policy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967070X25003130","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
As cities face growing mental health challenges, the role of transport infrastructure in shaping psychological wellbeing remains underexplored. This study investigated how cycling accessibility, mental healthcare provision, and income inequality jointly influence the spatial distribution of severe mental health outcomes in Seoul. Employing a three-stage spatial framework, Geographically Weighted Regression (GWR), Random Forest (RF), and Suitability Analysis (SA), this study assessed the spatial heterogeneity, nonlinear interactions, and district-level intervention priorities. Results from GWR indicate that cycling infrastructure is the most consistent spatial predictor of mental health disparities, with coefficients as high as 0.81 in districts like Gangnam-gu. Healthcare access and income inequality show more localised yet significant associations. RF modelling confirmed these patterns, ranking healthcare (36 %), cycling accessibility (33 %), and income inequality (31 %) as primary contributors. SA highlights districts such as Songpa-gu and Gangnam-gu as high-priority areas for integrated transportation and public health interventions. Anomalies such as Gangseo-gu, where high vulnerability coexists with low model fit, underscore the need for further localised investigation. By integrating spatial analytics with transport equity and health policy perspectives, this study provides a scalable framework for mental health sensitive infrastructure planning. It positions cycling not only as a sustainable mobility solution but also as a key policy lever for advancing urban health equity.
期刊介绍:
Transport Policy is an international journal aimed at bridging the gap between theory and practice in transport. Its subject areas reflect the concerns of policymakers in government, industry, voluntary organisations and the public at large, providing independent, original and rigorous analysis to understand how policy decisions have been taken, monitor their effects, and suggest how they may be improved. The journal treats the transport sector comprehensively, and in the context of other sectors including energy, housing, industry and planning. All modes are covered: land, sea and air; road and rail; public and private; motorised and non-motorised; passenger and freight.