Spatial determinants of mental health in Seoul: Cycling, income inequality, and access to care

IF 6.3 2区 工程技术 Q1 ECONOMICS
Madiha Bencekri, Juhyeon Kwak, Sion Kim, Minje Choi, Juho Lee, Jongwon Lee, Seungjae Lee
{"title":"Spatial determinants of mental health in Seoul: Cycling, income inequality, and access to care","authors":"Madiha Bencekri,&nbsp;Juhyeon Kwak,&nbsp;Sion Kim,&nbsp;Minje Choi,&nbsp;Juho Lee,&nbsp;Jongwon Lee,&nbsp;Seungjae Lee","doi":"10.1016/j.tranpol.2025.103770","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>As cities face growing mental health challenges, the role of transport infrastructure in shaping psychological wellbeing remains underexplored. This study investigated how cycling accessibility, mental healthcare provision, and income inequality jointly influence the spatial distribution of severe mental health outcomes in Seoul. Employing a three-stage spatial framework, Geographically Weighted Regression (GWR), Random Forest (RF), and Suitability Analysis (SA), this study assessed the spatial heterogeneity, nonlinear interactions, and district-level intervention priorities. Results from GWR indicate that cycling infrastructure is the most consistent spatial predictor of mental health disparities, with coefficients as high as 0.81 in districts like Gangnam-gu. Healthcare access and income inequality show more localised yet significant associations. RF modelling confirmed these patterns, ranking healthcare (36 %), cycling accessibility (33 %), and income inequality (31 %) as primary contributors. SA highlights districts such as Songpa-gu and Gangnam-gu as high-priority areas for integrated transportation and public health interventions. Anomalies such as Gangseo-gu, where high vulnerability coexists with low model fit, underscore the need for further localised investigation. By integrating spatial analytics with transport equity and health policy perspectives, this study provides a scalable framework for mental health sensitive infrastructure planning. It positions cycling not only as a sustainable mobility solution but also as a key policy lever for advancing urban health equity.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48378,"journal":{"name":"Transport Policy","volume":"172 ","pages":"Article 103770"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transport Policy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967070X25003130","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As cities face growing mental health challenges, the role of transport infrastructure in shaping psychological wellbeing remains underexplored. This study investigated how cycling accessibility, mental healthcare provision, and income inequality jointly influence the spatial distribution of severe mental health outcomes in Seoul. Employing a three-stage spatial framework, Geographically Weighted Regression (GWR), Random Forest (RF), and Suitability Analysis (SA), this study assessed the spatial heterogeneity, nonlinear interactions, and district-level intervention priorities. Results from GWR indicate that cycling infrastructure is the most consistent spatial predictor of mental health disparities, with coefficients as high as 0.81 in districts like Gangnam-gu. Healthcare access and income inequality show more localised yet significant associations. RF modelling confirmed these patterns, ranking healthcare (36 %), cycling accessibility (33 %), and income inequality (31 %) as primary contributors. SA highlights districts such as Songpa-gu and Gangnam-gu as high-priority areas for integrated transportation and public health interventions. Anomalies such as Gangseo-gu, where high vulnerability coexists with low model fit, underscore the need for further localised investigation. By integrating spatial analytics with transport equity and health policy perspectives, this study provides a scalable framework for mental health sensitive infrastructure planning. It positions cycling not only as a sustainable mobility solution but also as a key policy lever for advancing urban health equity.
首尔心理健康的空间决定因素:骑自行车、收入不平等和获得护理
随着城市面临越来越多的心理健康挑战,交通基础设施在塑造心理健康方面的作用仍未得到充分探索。本研究探讨了首尔骑行可达性、精神卫生保健提供和收入不平等如何共同影响严重精神卫生结果的空间分布。本研究采用地理加权回归(GWR)、随机森林(RF)和适宜性分析(SA)三阶段空间框架,评估了空间异质性、非线性相互作用和区级干预优先级。GWR的结果表明,骑行基础设施是心理健康差异的最一致的空间预测因子,在江南区等地区的系数高达0.81。医疗保健获取和收入不平等显示出更局部但更重要的关联。RF模型证实了这些模式,将医疗保健(36%)、自行车可达性(33%)和收入不平等(31%)列为主要影响因素。SA强调松坡区和江南区等地区是综合交通和公共卫生干预的高度优先地区。像江西区这样的异常情况,在高脆弱性与低模型拟合并存的情况下,强调了进一步进行局部调查的必要性。通过将空间分析与交通公平和卫生政策观点相结合,本研究为心理健康敏感基础设施规划提供了一个可扩展的框架。它不仅将骑自行车作为一种可持续的出行解决方案,而且将其作为促进城市卫生公平的关键政策杠杆。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Transport Policy
Transport Policy Multiple-
CiteScore
12.10
自引率
10.30%
发文量
282
期刊介绍: Transport Policy is an international journal aimed at bridging the gap between theory and practice in transport. Its subject areas reflect the concerns of policymakers in government, industry, voluntary organisations and the public at large, providing independent, original and rigorous analysis to understand how policy decisions have been taken, monitor their effects, and suggest how they may be improved. The journal treats the transport sector comprehensively, and in the context of other sectors including energy, housing, industry and planning. All modes are covered: land, sea and air; road and rail; public and private; motorised and non-motorised; passenger and freight.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信