Dynamic balance control during gait initiation with obstacle crossing: A comparison between children aged 3–16 years and adults

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q3 BIOPHYSICS
Keisuke Hirata , Takaki Kurogi , Takashi Muchima , Daiju Kinoshita , Haruna Kumano , Ayako Kawabata , Hiroka Ishizaki , Hiroki Mani
{"title":"Dynamic balance control during gait initiation with obstacle crossing: A comparison between children aged 3–16 years and adults","authors":"Keisuke Hirata ,&nbsp;Takaki Kurogi ,&nbsp;Takashi Muchima ,&nbsp;Daiju Kinoshita ,&nbsp;Haruna Kumano ,&nbsp;Ayako Kawabata ,&nbsp;Hiroka Ishizaki ,&nbsp;Hiroki Mani","doi":"10.1016/j.jbiomech.2025.112908","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Gait initiation (GI) requires precise postural control facilitated by anticipatory postural adjustments (APAs). Although previous studies have investigated APA development, few have examined the modulation of APAs and margin of stability (MoS) during the complex task of obstacle crossing during GI (GIObs), particularly comparing children and adults. This study determines how children and adults modulate APAs and the MoS during GI, with and without obstacles. The participants included 56 typically developing children (3–16 years) and 20 healthy young adults (19–24 years). The obstacle was placed at a distance equivalent to 50 % of the first step length of the participant, and its height was set to 10 % of the leg length. Kinematic and force plate data were collected to calculate the APA onset (APAonset) and peak (APApeak) in the anteroposterior (AP) and mediolateral (ML) directions and MoS in both directions. Children exhibited delayed APAonset and larger APApeak values than adults. Adults exhibited a greater decrease in MoS<sub>AP</sub> during GIObs than during GI, whereas children maintained a significantly larger MoS<sub>ML</sub> during GIObs. The step length was longer in GIObs than in GI, with no significant difference in clearance height between the groups. Compared with adults, children exhibited delayed APA onset, higher APA amplitude, and larger MoS<sub>ML</sub> during GIObs, indicating a more conservative approach to enhance lateral stability, possibly reflecting an adaptive strategy that aligns with their developing neuromotor control. These findings contribute to understanding the developmental trajectory of dynamic balance control and can inform age-appropriate interventions to support balance control in pediatric populations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15168,"journal":{"name":"Journal of biomechanics","volume":"191 ","pages":"Article 112908"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of biomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021929025004208","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Gait initiation (GI) requires precise postural control facilitated by anticipatory postural adjustments (APAs). Although previous studies have investigated APA development, few have examined the modulation of APAs and margin of stability (MoS) during the complex task of obstacle crossing during GI (GIObs), particularly comparing children and adults. This study determines how children and adults modulate APAs and the MoS during GI, with and without obstacles. The participants included 56 typically developing children (3–16 years) and 20 healthy young adults (19–24 years). The obstacle was placed at a distance equivalent to 50 % of the first step length of the participant, and its height was set to 10 % of the leg length. Kinematic and force plate data were collected to calculate the APA onset (APAonset) and peak (APApeak) in the anteroposterior (AP) and mediolateral (ML) directions and MoS in both directions. Children exhibited delayed APAonset and larger APApeak values than adults. Adults exhibited a greater decrease in MoSAP during GIObs than during GI, whereas children maintained a significantly larger MoSML during GIObs. The step length was longer in GIObs than in GI, with no significant difference in clearance height between the groups. Compared with adults, children exhibited delayed APA onset, higher APA amplitude, and larger MoSML during GIObs, indicating a more conservative approach to enhance lateral stability, possibly reflecting an adaptive strategy that aligns with their developing neuromotor control. These findings contribute to understanding the developmental trajectory of dynamic balance control and can inform age-appropriate interventions to support balance control in pediatric populations.
动态平衡控制在步态开始与障碍跨越:3-16岁儿童和成人的比较
步态启动(GI)需要精确的姿势控制,以促进预期的姿势调整(APAs)。虽然以前的研究已经调查了APA的发展,但很少有研究在GI (GIObs)复杂的障碍穿越任务中APA和稳定边际(MoS)的调节,特别是比较儿童和成人。本研究确定了儿童和成人在GI期间如何调节APAs和MoS,有障碍和无障碍。参与者包括56名正常发育的儿童(3-16岁)和20名健康的年轻人(19-24岁)。障碍物被放置在相当于参与者第一步长度的50%的距离,其高度被设置为腿长的10%。收集运动学和力板数据,计算前后位(AP)和中外侧(ML)方向的APA发病(apaponset)和峰值(APApeak)以及两个方向的mo。儿童APApeak值比成人大,APApeak值比成人晚。成人在GIObs期间MoSAP的下降幅度大于GI期间,而儿童在GIObs期间MoSML的下降幅度明显大于GI期间。GIObs组的步长比GI组长,但两组之间的清除率无显著差异。与成人相比,儿童在GIObs期间表现出延迟的APA发作,更高的APA振幅和更大的MoSML,表明更保守的方法来增强横向稳定性,可能反映了一种与发育中的神经运动控制相一致的适应性策略。这些发现有助于理解动态平衡控制的发展轨迹,并可以为儿童人群提供适龄干预措施以支持平衡控制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of biomechanics
Journal of biomechanics 生物-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
4.20%
发文量
345
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Biomechanics publishes reports of original and substantial findings using the principles of mechanics to explore biological problems. Analytical, as well as experimental papers may be submitted, and the journal accepts original articles, surveys and perspective articles (usually by Editorial invitation only), book reviews and letters to the Editor. The criteria for acceptance of manuscripts include excellence, novelty, significance, clarity, conciseness and interest to the readership. Papers published in the journal may cover a wide range of topics in biomechanics, including, but not limited to: -Fundamental Topics - Biomechanics of the musculoskeletal, cardiovascular, and respiratory systems, mechanics of hard and soft tissues, biofluid mechanics, mechanics of prostheses and implant-tissue interfaces, mechanics of cells. -Cardiovascular and Respiratory Biomechanics - Mechanics of blood-flow, air-flow, mechanics of the soft tissues, flow-tissue or flow-prosthesis interactions. -Cell Biomechanics - Biomechanic analyses of cells, membranes and sub-cellular structures; the relationship of the mechanical environment to cell and tissue response. -Dental Biomechanics - Design and analysis of dental tissues and prostheses, mechanics of chewing. -Functional Tissue Engineering - The role of biomechanical factors in engineered tissue replacements and regenerative medicine. -Injury Biomechanics - Mechanics of impact and trauma, dynamics of man-machine interaction. -Molecular Biomechanics - Mechanical analyses of biomolecules. -Orthopedic Biomechanics - Mechanics of fracture and fracture fixation, mechanics of implants and implant fixation, mechanics of bones and joints, wear of natural and artificial joints. -Rehabilitation Biomechanics - Analyses of gait, mechanics of prosthetics and orthotics. -Sports Biomechanics - Mechanical analyses of sports performance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信