{"title":"A method for calculating the oblique cross-slope tillage factor","authors":"Lixia Dong, Baoyuan Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.catena.2025.109387","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In regions with rolling hills, oblique cross-slope tillage is more common than contour or up-and-down slope tillage. However, its role in soil erosion assessments has been largely overlooked, and the impact of contour tillage has often even been disregarded due to the limitations of existing evaluation methods. To address these gaps, a novel soil erosion factor—the oblique cross-slope tillage subfactor (<em>T<sub>o</sub></em>)—was proposed, and a raster-based method was developed to accurately quantify the influence of the furrow direction on soil erosion. Using a 28 km<sup>2</sup> watershed in northeastern China as a case study, tillage lines were digitized from satellite images, and furrow contour angles were computed on the basis of their relationships with contour lines. The furrow direction modification coefficient relative to contour tillage was then used to derive <em>T<sub>o</sub></em>. Soil erosion was assessed both with and without <em>T<sub>o</sub></em>. The results showed that oblique cross-slope tillage covered 46.1 % of the study area, and the exclusion of <em>T<sub>o</sub></em> resulted in a 26.5 % overestimation of erosion rates, highlighting the importance of incorporating <em>T<sub>o</sub></em> into soil erosion assessments. The furrow contour angle varied significantly within parcels, with an average variation of 70.8°. The grid-based method for calculating <em>T<sub>o</sub></em> was more accurate and practical than traditional parcel-based approaches. <em>T<sub>o</sub></em> effectively captures the impact of oblique cross-slope tillage at various angles and could serve as a universal substitute for specific cases of contour and up-and-down slope tillage. Incorporating <em>T<sub>o</sub></em> into soil erosion models could increase their accuracy and provide more reliable guidance for soil conservation planning.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9801,"journal":{"name":"Catena","volume":"259 ","pages":"Article 109387"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Catena","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0341816225006897","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In regions with rolling hills, oblique cross-slope tillage is more common than contour or up-and-down slope tillage. However, its role in soil erosion assessments has been largely overlooked, and the impact of contour tillage has often even been disregarded due to the limitations of existing evaluation methods. To address these gaps, a novel soil erosion factor—the oblique cross-slope tillage subfactor (To)—was proposed, and a raster-based method was developed to accurately quantify the influence of the furrow direction on soil erosion. Using a 28 km2 watershed in northeastern China as a case study, tillage lines were digitized from satellite images, and furrow contour angles were computed on the basis of their relationships with contour lines. The furrow direction modification coefficient relative to contour tillage was then used to derive To. Soil erosion was assessed both with and without To. The results showed that oblique cross-slope tillage covered 46.1 % of the study area, and the exclusion of To resulted in a 26.5 % overestimation of erosion rates, highlighting the importance of incorporating To into soil erosion assessments. The furrow contour angle varied significantly within parcels, with an average variation of 70.8°. The grid-based method for calculating To was more accurate and practical than traditional parcel-based approaches. To effectively captures the impact of oblique cross-slope tillage at various angles and could serve as a universal substitute for specific cases of contour and up-and-down slope tillage. Incorporating To into soil erosion models could increase their accuracy and provide more reliable guidance for soil conservation planning.
期刊介绍:
Catena publishes papers describing original field and laboratory investigations and reviews on geoecology and landscape evolution with emphasis on interdisciplinary aspects of soil science, hydrology and geomorphology. It aims to disseminate new knowledge and foster better understanding of the physical environment, of evolutionary sequences that have resulted in past and current landscapes, and of the natural processes that are likely to determine the fate of our terrestrial environment.
Papers within any one of the above topics are welcome provided they are of sufficiently wide interest and relevance.