Identifying individual drivers of damage to oak during severe UK storms in winter 2021

IF 5.7 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY
Kate Halstead , Roy Sanderson , Salvatore Bonomo , Christopher Quine , Andrew Suggitt , Rachel Gaulton
{"title":"Identifying individual drivers of damage to oak during severe UK storms in winter 2021","authors":"Kate Halstead ,&nbsp;Roy Sanderson ,&nbsp;Salvatore Bonomo ,&nbsp;Christopher Quine ,&nbsp;Andrew Suggitt ,&nbsp;Rachel Gaulton","doi":"10.1016/j.agrformet.2025.110797","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>There has been an increase in windstorm disturbance events in European forests over the past ∼50 years, exacerbated by anthropogenic climate change. In this study, we examined the factors influencing storm damage to oak tree species native to Great Britain (<em>Quercus robur</em> and <em>Quercus petraea</em>) following two successive and severe <em>Storms, Arwen</em> and <em>Barra</em>, in the UK in winter 2021. A combination of novel data collection methods, dendrochronology and remote sensing, and data analysis models, Structural Equation Modelling (SEM) and Random Forest, are used to evaluate storm impacts at both individual tree and site-wide scales. This research directly compares a well-established but data-driven machine-learning method, Random Forest, with a novel, untested approach for wind risk modelling, SEM, to determine whether SEM is a viable method for identifying predictors of storm damage. SEM is a hypothesis-driven method which allows testing of relationships based on prior ecological knowledge. This analysis investigates whether pre-existing health conditions, such as disease and structural defects, influence an oak tree’s vulnerability to storm damage. Both models indicated that individual tree characteristics, notably structural defects and growth rate, were stronger predictors of storm damage than topographic factors. Disease symptoms were also important at the site-wide scale. SEM enabled identification of indirect pathways - for example, showing that disease symptoms were associated with reduced growth, which in turn increased susceptibility to damage - relationships not detected in Random Forest outputs. Furthermore, oak trees with faster growth rates were more prone to storm impacts; across all sites, cumulative growth rates (2000–2015) of storm-damaged trees were 22.8% greater than those of undamaged trees. Our findings contribute to the understanding of wind risk, aiding the parameterisation of risk models for oak, whilst also providing site managers with insights to support conservation efforts. Identifying drivers of damage is crucial given increasing climate-induced storm risk.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50839,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural and Forest Meteorology","volume":"373 ","pages":"Article 110797"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural and Forest Meteorology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168192325004162","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There has been an increase in windstorm disturbance events in European forests over the past ∼50 years, exacerbated by anthropogenic climate change. In this study, we examined the factors influencing storm damage to oak tree species native to Great Britain (Quercus robur and Quercus petraea) following two successive and severe Storms, Arwen and Barra, in the UK in winter 2021. A combination of novel data collection methods, dendrochronology and remote sensing, and data analysis models, Structural Equation Modelling (SEM) and Random Forest, are used to evaluate storm impacts at both individual tree and site-wide scales. This research directly compares a well-established but data-driven machine-learning method, Random Forest, with a novel, untested approach for wind risk modelling, SEM, to determine whether SEM is a viable method for identifying predictors of storm damage. SEM is a hypothesis-driven method which allows testing of relationships based on prior ecological knowledge. This analysis investigates whether pre-existing health conditions, such as disease and structural defects, influence an oak tree’s vulnerability to storm damage. Both models indicated that individual tree characteristics, notably structural defects and growth rate, were stronger predictors of storm damage than topographic factors. Disease symptoms were also important at the site-wide scale. SEM enabled identification of indirect pathways - for example, showing that disease symptoms were associated with reduced growth, which in turn increased susceptibility to damage - relationships not detected in Random Forest outputs. Furthermore, oak trees with faster growth rates were more prone to storm impacts; across all sites, cumulative growth rates (2000–2015) of storm-damaged trees were 22.8% greater than those of undamaged trees. Our findings contribute to the understanding of wind risk, aiding the parameterisation of risk models for oak, whilst also providing site managers with insights to support conservation efforts. Identifying drivers of damage is crucial given increasing climate-induced storm risk.
确定2021年冬季英国严重风暴期间橡树受损的个别驱动因素
在过去的50年里,欧洲森林的风暴干扰事件有所增加,人为气候变化加剧了这一现象。在本研究中,我们研究了2021年冬季英国连续两次严重风暴Arwen和Barra后,影响英国本土橡树(Quercus robur和Quercus pepeea)风暴损害的因素。结合新的数据收集方法,树木年代学和遥感,以及数据分析模型,结构方程模型(SEM)和随机森林,用于评估单个树木和站点范围内的风暴影响。这项研究直接比较了一种成熟的数据驱动的机器学习方法Random Forest和一种新颖的、未经测试的风风险建模方法SEM,以确定SEM是否是一种识别风暴损害预测者的可行方法。SEM是一种假设驱动的方法,允许测试基于先前生态知识的关系。这项分析调查了是否存在健康状况,如疾病和结构缺陷,会影响橡树对风暴破坏的脆弱性。两种模型都表明,单株树木的特征,特别是结构缺陷和生长速度,比地形因素更能预测风暴损害。疾病症状在整个站点范围内也很重要。扫描电镜能够识别间接途径——例如,表明疾病症状与生长减少有关,而生长减少反过来又增加了对损害的易感性——这些关系在随机森林输出中没有发现。生长速度快的橡树更容易受到风暴的影响;在所有站点中,受风暴破坏的树木的累积增长率(2000-2015年)比未受风暴破坏的树木高22.8%。我们的研究结果有助于理解风风险,帮助橡树风险模型的参数化,同时也为现场管理者提供支持保护工作的见解。鉴于气候引起的风暴风险日益增加,确定造成损害的驱动因素至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
9.70%
发文量
415
审稿时长
69 days
期刊介绍: Agricultural and Forest Meteorology is an international journal for the publication of original articles and reviews on the inter-relationship between meteorology, agriculture, forestry, and natural ecosystems. Emphasis is on basic and applied scientific research relevant to practical problems in the field of plant and soil sciences, ecology and biogeochemistry as affected by weather as well as climate variability and change. Theoretical models should be tested against experimental data. Articles must appeal to an international audience. Special issues devoted to single topics are also published. Typical topics include canopy micrometeorology (e.g. canopy radiation transfer, turbulence near the ground, evapotranspiration, energy balance, fluxes of trace gases), micrometeorological instrumentation (e.g., sensors for trace gases, flux measurement instruments, radiation measurement techniques), aerobiology (e.g. the dispersion of pollen, spores, insects and pesticides), biometeorology (e.g. the effect of weather and climate on plant distribution, crop yield, water-use efficiency, and plant phenology), forest-fire/weather interactions, and feedbacks from vegetation to weather and the climate system.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信