Do researchers have a shared cognition on team cognition in sports?

IF 3.3 2区心理学 Q2 HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM

Psychology of Sport and Exercise Pub Date : 2025-08-16 DOI:10.1016/j.psychsport.2025.102971

Charlotte Behlau, Dennis Dreiskämper

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Team cognition (TC) is often used as an umbrella term to describe how cognitive processes are relevant for effective sports teams. Eldadi and Tenenbaum (2025) provide a comprehensive review of the foundation and developments of TC and outline future directions for research and practice. Building on their work, we would like to highlight three additional aspects that, in our view, require further attention of team cognition researchers in sport: First, there exists a “jingle-jangle jungle” of terms and methods within team cognition. Second, this conceptual and methodological inconsistency highlights the need for clear and distinct definitions of the different terms resolving the jingle-jangle jungle. Third, these efforts must be grounded in the specific characteristics and demands of the sport context.

查看原文本刊更多论文

研究人员对体育运动中的团队认知是否有共同的认知？

团队认知（TC）通常被用作描述认知过程如何与有效的体育团队相关的总称。Eldadi和Tenenbaum（2025）对技术支持的基础和发展进行了全面回顾，并概述了未来的研究和实践方向。在他们工作的基础上，我们想强调另外三个方面，在我们看来，需要进一步关注体育团队认知研究者：首先，在团队认知中存在术语和方法的“叮当作响的丛林”。其次，这种概念和方法上的不一致突出了对不同术语的明确和明确定义的必要性，以解决叮当作响的丛林问题。第三，这些努力必须立足于体育环境的具体特点和要求。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Psychology of Sport and Exercise 医学-心理学

CiteScore

6.40

自引率

5.90%

发文量

172

审稿时长

69 days

期刊介绍： Psychology of Sport and Exercise is an international forum for scholarly reports in the psychology of sport and exercise, broadly defined. The journal is open to the use of diverse methodological approaches. Manuscripts that will be considered for publication will present results from high quality empirical research, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, commentaries concerning already published PSE papers or topics of general interest for PSE readers, protocol papers for trials, and reports of professional practice (which will need to demonstrate academic rigour and go beyond mere description). The CONSORT guidelines consort-statement need to be followed for protocol papers for trials; authors should present a flow diagramme and attach with their cover letter the CONSORT checklist. For meta-analysis, the PRISMA prisma-statement guidelines should be followed; authors should present a flow diagramme and attach with their cover letter the PRISMA checklist. For systematic reviews it is recommended that the PRISMA guidelines are followed, although it is not compulsory. Authors interested in submitting replications of published studies need to contact the Editors-in-Chief before they start their replication. We are not interested in manuscripts that aim to test the psychometric properties of an existing scale from English to another language, unless new validation methods are used which address previously unanswered research questions.