Loss of characteristic species of open habitats across Germany detected by repeated mapping of protected habitats

IF 4.4 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
Lina Lüttgert , Samuel Heisterkamp , Florian Jansen , Rico Kaufmann , Simon Kellner , Reinhard Arnold Klenke , Silke Lütt , Gunnar Seidler , Axel Wedler , Ronja Wörmann , Helge Bruelheide
{"title":"Loss of characteristic species of open habitats across Germany detected by repeated mapping of protected habitats","authors":"Lina Lüttgert ,&nbsp;Samuel Heisterkamp ,&nbsp;Florian Jansen ,&nbsp;Rico Kaufmann ,&nbsp;Simon Kellner ,&nbsp;Reinhard Arnold Klenke ,&nbsp;Silke Lütt ,&nbsp;Gunnar Seidler ,&nbsp;Axel Wedler ,&nbsp;Ronja Wörmann ,&nbsp;Helge Bruelheide","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2025.111410","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Identifying the winners and losers of biodiversity change within different habitat types requires systematic monitoring data. However, such data are particularly scarce at the regional scale, with species trends rarely reported. While systematic data are still lacking, species trends could be instead derived from previously untapped sources. To do so, we make use of plant species occurrences records that were recorded in repeated habitat mapping programs in Germany. We derive temporal trends in plant species from data of three German federal states from 1977 to 2021, both across all habitat types per state and within habitat types. Consistently negative trends were found across all states for species preferring heaths and semi-natural grasslands, moist to wet grasslands, and coastal and marine habitats, including many endangered species. Consistently positive trends were found for species preferring scrub, copses and field hedges, and for non-native species. Moreover, trends within habitat types showed negative trends for species characteristic of most open habitat types, with many of those habitats showing a woody encroachment. While trends varied among states, the overall patterns were very similar. These consistent trends mirror findings in other countries and point to ongoing habitat degradation and common drivers of biodiversity change in Germany. Our findings contribute to the main goals set by the EU Biodiversity Strategy with our species trends serving as monitoring of biodiversity, that can help to improve the management of protected habitat types and nature restoration.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55375,"journal":{"name":"Biological Conservation","volume":"311 ","pages":"Article 111410"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological Conservation","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006320725004471","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Identifying the winners and losers of biodiversity change within different habitat types requires systematic monitoring data. However, such data are particularly scarce at the regional scale, with species trends rarely reported. While systematic data are still lacking, species trends could be instead derived from previously untapped sources. To do so, we make use of plant species occurrences records that were recorded in repeated habitat mapping programs in Germany. We derive temporal trends in plant species from data of three German federal states from 1977 to 2021, both across all habitat types per state and within habitat types. Consistently negative trends were found across all states for species preferring heaths and semi-natural grasslands, moist to wet grasslands, and coastal and marine habitats, including many endangered species. Consistently positive trends were found for species preferring scrub, copses and field hedges, and for non-native species. Moreover, trends within habitat types showed negative trends for species characteristic of most open habitat types, with many of those habitats showing a woody encroachment. While trends varied among states, the overall patterns were very similar. These consistent trends mirror findings in other countries and point to ongoing habitat degradation and common drivers of biodiversity change in Germany. Our findings contribute to the main goals set by the EU Biodiversity Strategy with our species trends serving as monitoring of biodiversity, that can help to improve the management of protected habitat types and nature restoration.
通过对受保护栖息地的重复测绘,发现德国各地开放栖息地特征物种的丧失
确定不同生境类型生物多样性变化的赢家和输家需要系统的监测数据。然而,这类数据在区域尺度上尤其稀缺,物种趋势很少被报道。虽然仍然缺乏系统的数据,但可以从以前未开发的资源中获得物种趋势。为了做到这一点,我们利用了在德国重复的栖息地测绘项目中记录的植物物种发生记录。我们从1977年至2021年三个德国联邦州的数据中得出了植物物种的时间趋势,包括每个州的所有栖息地类型和栖息地类型。在所有州,包括许多濒危物种在内的物种都倾向于选择荒地和半自然草原、湿润草原和沿海和海洋栖息地,这一趋势一直呈负面趋势。对于偏爱灌丛、灌木林和田野树篱的物种,以及非本地物种,发现了一致的积极趋势。此外,大多数开放生境类型的物种特征在生境类型内呈负向趋势,其中许多生境表现出木质侵蚀。虽然各州的趋势各不相同,但总体模式非常相似。这些一致的趋势反映了其他国家的发现,并指出了德国正在发生的栖息地退化和生物多样性变化的共同驱动因素。我们的研究结果有助于实现欧盟生物多样性战略设定的主要目标,我们的物种趋势可以监测生物多样性,有助于改善受保护栖息地类型的管理和自然恢复。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biological Conservation
Biological Conservation 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
10.20
自引率
3.40%
发文量
295
审稿时长
61 days
期刊介绍: Biological Conservation is an international leading journal in the discipline of conservation biology. The journal publishes articles spanning a diverse range of fields that contribute to the biological, sociological, and economic dimensions of conservation and natural resource management. The primary aim of Biological Conservation is the publication of high-quality papers that advance the science and practice of conservation, or which demonstrate the application of conservation principles for natural resource management and policy. Therefore it will be of interest to a broad international readership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信