Reasons for Delayed Carotid Endarterectomy for Symptomatic Carotid Stenosis in Norway 2018–2019: A National Audit

IF 1.4 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Martin Altreuther , Celine Harlinn Sørlie , Benedicte Skaug Hansen , Christian Lyng , Karsten Myhre , Toril Rabben , Ramez Bahar , Tonje Berglund , Dorte Bundgaard , Erik Mulder Pettersen
{"title":"Reasons for Delayed Carotid Endarterectomy for Symptomatic Carotid Stenosis in Norway 2018–2019: A National Audit","authors":"Martin Altreuther ,&nbsp;Celine Harlinn Sørlie ,&nbsp;Benedicte Skaug Hansen ,&nbsp;Christian Lyng ,&nbsp;Karsten Myhre ,&nbsp;Toril Rabben ,&nbsp;Ramez Bahar ,&nbsp;Tonje Berglund ,&nbsp;Dorte Bundgaard ,&nbsp;Erik Mulder Pettersen","doi":"10.1016/j.ejvsvf.2025.07.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Symptomatic carotid stenosis is one of the main causes of <em>amaurosis fugax</em>, transient ischaemic attack (TIA), and stroke. National and international guidelines recommend treatment with carotid endarterectomy (CEA) within 14 days of the index event. In Norway, the proportion of patients operated on within 14 days increased from 65% in 2015 to 83% in 2020. A national clinical audit cross sectional study was performed to identify the reasons for delayed CEA that could be addressed by quality improvement.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Patients operated on by CEA for symptomatic stenosis more than 14 days after the index event in 2018 and 2019 were identified from the Norwegian Registry for Vascular Surgery. The local registrar assessed the reason for the delay, based on the medical record. Possible reasons for delay were categorised as medical reasons, doctor delay, patient delay, and other reasons.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Fourteen units performed 686 CEA for symptomatic stenosis in Norway in the study period, of which 179 (26%) were delayed. Ten units participated in the audit, accounting for 120 of 179 (67%) delayed CEAs. The reason for delay was identified for all patients in the participating units. There was a medical reason for the delay in 23 patients. There was doctor delay in 54 cases, patient delay in 28 cases, and a combination of patient delay and doctor delay in 10 cases. The reason for the delay was travel abroad in five cases.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Delayed CEA for symptomatic stenosis is usually due to doctor delay or patient delay. Medical reasons account for 19% of delayed operations. This implies that quality improvement is feasible by addressing doctor and patient delay. Healthcare providers should implement strategies to decrease the proportion of delayed CEA for symptomatic stenosis. Patient delay should be addressed with regular information campaigns.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36502,"journal":{"name":"EJVES Vascular Forum","volume":"64 ","pages":"Pages 78-82"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EJVES Vascular Forum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666688X25000504","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Symptomatic carotid stenosis is one of the main causes of amaurosis fugax, transient ischaemic attack (TIA), and stroke. National and international guidelines recommend treatment with carotid endarterectomy (CEA) within 14 days of the index event. In Norway, the proportion of patients operated on within 14 days increased from 65% in 2015 to 83% in 2020. A national clinical audit cross sectional study was performed to identify the reasons for delayed CEA that could be addressed by quality improvement.

Methods

Patients operated on by CEA for symptomatic stenosis more than 14 days after the index event in 2018 and 2019 were identified from the Norwegian Registry for Vascular Surgery. The local registrar assessed the reason for the delay, based on the medical record. Possible reasons for delay were categorised as medical reasons, doctor delay, patient delay, and other reasons.

Results

Fourteen units performed 686 CEA for symptomatic stenosis in Norway in the study period, of which 179 (26%) were delayed. Ten units participated in the audit, accounting for 120 of 179 (67%) delayed CEAs. The reason for delay was identified for all patients in the participating units. There was a medical reason for the delay in 23 patients. There was doctor delay in 54 cases, patient delay in 28 cases, and a combination of patient delay and doctor delay in 10 cases. The reason for the delay was travel abroad in five cases.

Conclusion

Delayed CEA for symptomatic stenosis is usually due to doctor delay or patient delay. Medical reasons account for 19% of delayed operations. This implies that quality improvement is feasible by addressing doctor and patient delay. Healthcare providers should implement strategies to decrease the proportion of delayed CEA for symptomatic stenosis. Patient delay should be addressed with regular information campaigns.
挪威2018-2019年症状性颈动脉狭窄延迟颈动脉内膜切除术的原因:国家审计
目的症状性颈动脉狭窄是隐匿性黑朦、短暂性脑缺血发作(TIA)和脑卒中的主要原因之一。国家和国际指南建议在指数事件发生后14天内进行颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)治疗。在挪威,14天内接受手术的患者比例从2015年的65%上升到2020年的83%。我们进行了一项全国临床审计横断面研究,以确定可以通过质量改进来解决的CEA延迟的原因。方法从挪威血管外科登记中心(Norwegian Registry for Vascular Surgery)中筛选2018年和2019年因症状性狭窄术后超过14天接受CEA手术的患者。当地登记员根据医疗记录评估了延误的原因。可能的延误原因分为医疗原因、医生延误、患者延误和其他原因。结果在研究期间,挪威有14个单位对症状性狭窄进行了686例CEA,其中179例(26%)延迟。有10个单位参加了审计,占179个延期CEAs中的120个(67%)。在参与单位的所有患者中确定了延迟的原因。23名病人的延误是有医疗原因的。医生延误54例,患者延误28例,患者和医生共同延误10例。延误的原因是有五次出国旅行。结论有症状性狭窄的迟发性CEA多因医生或患者延误所致。医疗原因占手术延迟的19%。这意味着通过解决医患延误问题,质量改善是可行的。医疗保健提供者应实施策略,以减少延迟CEA的比例症状狭窄。应定期开展宣传活动,解决患者延误问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
EJVES Vascular Forum
EJVES Vascular Forum Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
145
审稿时长
102 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信