Dylan J. Heino , Scott Telfer , Kimberly A. Nickerson , Christina Carranza , Mathew Sunil Varre , Avocet Nagle-Christensen , William R. Ledoux , Brittney C. Muir
{"title":"Pathways of load transfer in custom accommodative insoles for people with diabetes","authors":"Dylan J. Heino , Scott Telfer , Kimberly A. Nickerson , Christina Carranza , Mathew Sunil Varre , Avocet Nagle-Christensen , William R. Ledoux , Brittney C. Muir","doi":"10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2025.106645","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Custom accommodative insoles help reduce plantar pressures in people with diabetes who are at risk of developing foot ulcers. We have developed 3D printed custom accommodative insoles with patient-specific geometry and material properties that improve offloading performance compared to traditional insoles. While effective at offloading forefoot pressure, their load redistribution mechanisms across the full foot remain unclear. The purpose of this study is to compare the load redistribution mechanisms and pathways across nine plantar regions between standard and 3D printed insoles using a load transfer algorithm.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Twenty-six feet from 17 individuals with diabetes and high forefoot plantar pressure were included. Each participant received three pairs of custom accommodative insoles: standard of care, finite element optimized 3D printed, and pressure-based 3D printed. Peak plantar pressure and force-time-integral were recorded during walking, and a load transfer algorithm was used to map redistribution.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>The main pathway of load transfer across all insoles was from the metatarsal heads to the midfoot, particularly from the first metatarsal head to the medial midfoot. The finite element optimized 3D printed custom accommodative insoles had the largest load transfers away from the metatarsal heads compared to the other insole conditions.</div></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><div>Design elements like arch height, metatarsal bars, and offloading zones influenced load transfer pathways. These results underscore the potential of custom accommodative insole designs to offload high-risk areas and adds an additional perspective to quantify insole performance, though subject-specific variability remains an important factor.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50992,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Biomechanics","volume":"129 ","pages":"Article 106645"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Biomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0268003325002189","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Custom accommodative insoles help reduce plantar pressures in people with diabetes who are at risk of developing foot ulcers. We have developed 3D printed custom accommodative insoles with patient-specific geometry and material properties that improve offloading performance compared to traditional insoles. While effective at offloading forefoot pressure, their load redistribution mechanisms across the full foot remain unclear. The purpose of this study is to compare the load redistribution mechanisms and pathways across nine plantar regions between standard and 3D printed insoles using a load transfer algorithm.
Methods
Twenty-six feet from 17 individuals with diabetes and high forefoot plantar pressure were included. Each participant received three pairs of custom accommodative insoles: standard of care, finite element optimized 3D printed, and pressure-based 3D printed. Peak plantar pressure and force-time-integral were recorded during walking, and a load transfer algorithm was used to map redistribution.
Findings
The main pathway of load transfer across all insoles was from the metatarsal heads to the midfoot, particularly from the first metatarsal head to the medial midfoot. The finite element optimized 3D printed custom accommodative insoles had the largest load transfers away from the metatarsal heads compared to the other insole conditions.
Interpretation
Design elements like arch height, metatarsal bars, and offloading zones influenced load transfer pathways. These results underscore the potential of custom accommodative insole designs to offload high-risk areas and adds an additional perspective to quantify insole performance, though subject-specific variability remains an important factor.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Biomechanics is an international multidisciplinary journal of biomechanics with a focus on medical and clinical applications of new knowledge in the field.
The science of biomechanics helps explain the causes of cell, tissue, organ and body system disorders, and supports clinicians in the diagnosis, prognosis and evaluation of treatment methods and technologies. Clinical Biomechanics aims to strengthen the links between laboratory and clinic by publishing cutting-edge biomechanics research which helps to explain the causes of injury and disease, and which provides evidence contributing to improved clinical management.
A rigorous peer review system is employed and every attempt is made to process and publish top-quality papers promptly.
Clinical Biomechanics explores all facets of body system, organ, tissue and cell biomechanics, with an emphasis on medical and clinical applications of the basic science aspects. The role of basic science is therefore recognized in a medical or clinical context. The readership of the journal closely reflects its multi-disciplinary contents, being a balance of scientists, engineers and clinicians.
The contents are in the form of research papers, brief reports, review papers and correspondence, whilst special interest issues and supplements are published from time to time.
Disciplines covered include biomechanics and mechanobiology at all scales, bioengineering and use of tissue engineering and biomaterials for clinical applications, biophysics, as well as biomechanical aspects of medical robotics, ergonomics, physical and occupational therapeutics and rehabilitation.