Effect of accounting for powder in thermomechanical simulations for laser powder bed fusion

IF 2 Q3 ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING
Erik Denlinger, Zoe Michaleris , Tyler Nelson
{"title":"Effect of accounting for powder in thermomechanical simulations for laser powder bed fusion","authors":"Erik Denlinger,&nbsp;Zoe Michaleris ,&nbsp;Tyler Nelson","doi":"10.1016/j.mfglet.2025.07.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study evaluates the effect of accounting for powder in mechanical predictions for laser powder-bed-fusion by comparing: an inherent-strain based mechanical-only analysis, and thermomechanical simulations where the thermal analysis is conducted with and without powder elements. Results on Inconel 718 parts show that the thermal predictions with powder elements have less than 7 % error while the thermal predictions without powder elements could not capture the trend in measurements. In predicting the peak distortion, the thermomechanical model with powder elements has 21 % lower prediction error than the model without powder elements and 30 % lower prediction error than the mechanical-only analysis.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":38186,"journal":{"name":"Manufacturing Letters","volume":"45 ","pages":"Pages 93-100"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Manufacturing Letters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213846325002652","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study evaluates the effect of accounting for powder in mechanical predictions for laser powder-bed-fusion by comparing: an inherent-strain based mechanical-only analysis, and thermomechanical simulations where the thermal analysis is conducted with and without powder elements. Results on Inconel 718 parts show that the thermal predictions with powder elements have less than 7 % error while the thermal predictions without powder elements could not capture the trend in measurements. In predicting the peak distortion, the thermomechanical model with powder elements has 21 % lower prediction error than the model without powder elements and 30 % lower prediction error than the mechanical-only analysis.
粉末计算对激光粉末床熔合热力学模拟的影响
本研究通过比较:仅基于固有应变的机械分析和热力学模拟(在有和没有粉末元素的情况下进行热分析),评估了在激光粉末床熔合的力学预测中考虑粉末的影响。对Inconel 718零件的热预测结果表明,使用粉末元素的热预测误差小于7%,而不使用粉末元素的热预测无法捕捉到测量趋势。在预测峰值畸变时,含粉末元素的热力学模型比不含粉末元素的热力学模型的预测误差低21%,比只含机械元素的热力学模型的预测误差低30%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Manufacturing Letters
Manufacturing Letters Engineering-Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
5.10%
发文量
192
审稿时长
60 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信