Survey on language rehabilitation methods in deaf Italian children with cochlear implants

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Giorgia Mari , Felicia Zagari , Alessandro Scorpecci , Angelo Tizio , Alessandra Resca , Emilia Cascio , Pasquale Marsella , Jacopo Galli , Lucia D'Alatri
{"title":"Survey on language rehabilitation methods in deaf Italian children with cochlear implants","authors":"Giorgia Mari ,&nbsp;Felicia Zagari ,&nbsp;Alessandro Scorpecci ,&nbsp;Angelo Tizio ,&nbsp;Alessandra Resca ,&nbsp;Emilia Cascio ,&nbsp;Pasquale Marsella ,&nbsp;Jacopo Galli ,&nbsp;Lucia D'Alatri","doi":"10.1016/j.ijporl.2025.112513","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To survey the rehabilitation methods of deaf Italian children implanted in two tertiary care referral centers; to investigate on associations between rehabilitation method and patients’ clinical features.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>Inclusion criteria were age ≤16 years, diagnosis of pre-perilingual bilateral deafness of severe-profound degree, use of cochlear implants (CIs) for at least 8 h a day, ongoing speech therapy. Children's Speech and Language Therapists (SLTs) were emailed a questionnaire created for the study purpose and consisting of 39 yes/no questions exploring five fundamental areas of speech and language rehabilitation. For each questionnaire, a separate score was obtained for the following Italian methods: Auditory Verbal Therapy (AVT), Cognitive Oralism (CO), Bimodal (B) and Dreazancic (D). AVT and CO were considered as oral methods, whereas B and D were categorized as mixed methods.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>100 SLTs responded to the questionnaire. The rehabilitation method was composite in the majority (69 %) of cases. The most prevalent method was CO (32.5 %), followed by D (28.4 %), B (18.7 %), and AVT (15.4 %); in 6 cases (4.9 %) AVT and CO scored equally high. No association was found between patients’ demographic and clinical features and rehabilitation method.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>AVT resulted as the least prevalent method, whereas mixed methods covered almost 50 % of cases in our population. The majority of children in our sample were rehabilitated with combined approaches that did not seem to be related to any specific patients' characteristics, but possibly to therapists’ education and background.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14388,"journal":{"name":"International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology","volume":"197 ","pages":"Article 112513"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165587625003003","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

To survey the rehabilitation methods of deaf Italian children implanted in two tertiary care referral centers; to investigate on associations between rehabilitation method and patients’ clinical features.

Method

Inclusion criteria were age ≤16 years, diagnosis of pre-perilingual bilateral deafness of severe-profound degree, use of cochlear implants (CIs) for at least 8 h a day, ongoing speech therapy. Children's Speech and Language Therapists (SLTs) were emailed a questionnaire created for the study purpose and consisting of 39 yes/no questions exploring five fundamental areas of speech and language rehabilitation. For each questionnaire, a separate score was obtained for the following Italian methods: Auditory Verbal Therapy (AVT), Cognitive Oralism (CO), Bimodal (B) and Dreazancic (D). AVT and CO were considered as oral methods, whereas B and D were categorized as mixed methods.

Results

100 SLTs responded to the questionnaire. The rehabilitation method was composite in the majority (69 %) of cases. The most prevalent method was CO (32.5 %), followed by D (28.4 %), B (18.7 %), and AVT (15.4 %); in 6 cases (4.9 %) AVT and CO scored equally high. No association was found between patients’ demographic and clinical features and rehabilitation method.

Conclusions

AVT resulted as the least prevalent method, whereas mixed methods covered almost 50 % of cases in our population. The majority of children in our sample were rehabilitated with combined approaches that did not seem to be related to any specific patients' characteristics, but possibly to therapists’ education and background.
意大利聋儿人工耳蜗语言康复方法的调查
目的探讨意大利聋儿在两家三级转诊中心植入术后的康复方法;目的:探讨康复方法与患者临床特征的关系。方法纳入标准:年龄≤16岁,诊断为重度双侧语前耳聋,每天使用人工耳蜗(CIs)至少8小时,正在进行语言治疗。儿童言语和语言治疗师(SLTs)通过电子邮件收到了一份为研究目的而制作的问卷,问卷由39个是/否问题组成,探讨了言语和语言康复的五个基本领域。对于每份问卷,分别对以下意大利方法进行评分:听觉言语疗法(AVT)、认知言语疗法(CO)、双模式(B)和梦幻疗法(D)。AVT和CO为口服方法,B和D为混合方法。结果100名学生参与问卷调查。大多数病例(69%)采用复合康复方法。CO(32.5%)、D(28.4%)、B(18.7%)、AVT(15.4%)次之;6例(4.9%)AVT和CO评分相等。患者的人口学、临床特征与康复方法之间无相关性。结论savt是最不流行的方法,而混合方法几乎覆盖了我们人群中50%的病例。在我们的样本中,大多数儿童是通过综合方法康复的,这些方法似乎与任何特定患者的特征无关,但可能与治疗师的教育和背景有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
6.70%
发文量
276
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: The purpose of the International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology is to concentrate and disseminate information concerning prevention, cure and care of otorhinolaryngological disorders in infants and children due to developmental, degenerative, infectious, neoplastic, traumatic, social, psychiatric and economic causes. The Journal provides a medium for clinical and basic contributions in all of the areas of pediatric otorhinolaryngology. This includes medical and surgical otology, bronchoesophagology, laryngology, rhinology, diseases of the head and neck, and disorders of communication, including voice, speech and language disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信