{"title":"Empowering econometric methods with machine learning for policy making: A comparative study in maritime transportation","authors":"Ruihan Wang , Tianyu Shang , Dong Yang , Ran Yan","doi":"10.1016/j.tra.2025.104635","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The maritime transportation plays a critical role in global trade, yet ensuring its safety and regulatory compliance remains a significant challenge. This study investigates the comparative strengths and limitations of econometric methods and machine learning in supporting policymaking. Leveraging publicly accessible data from port state control (PSC) inspections as the case study, we develop models to identify key factors influencing ship deficiencies (i.e., non-compliance) in PSC and to predict the number of deficiencies during inspections. The results show that machine learning outperforms econometric methods in predictive performance, while econometric methods offer unique advantages in providing interpretable causal insights, enabling a deep understanding of the factors influencing ship deficiencies. Furthermore, by integrating machine learning techniques into econometric frameworks, we uncover nuanced relationships — such as the heterogeneous impact of ship age on ship deficiencies and a U-shaped relationship between ship tonnage and deficiencies — while also enhancing the predictive reliability of econometric methods. By combining the interpretability of econometric methods with the predictive power of machine learning, this study establishes a robust framework for assessing ship risk, enhancing maritime safety management, mitigating maritime risks, and improving transportation policies and regulations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49421,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part A-Policy and Practice","volume":"200 ","pages":"Article 104635"},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part A-Policy and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965856425002630","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The maritime transportation plays a critical role in global trade, yet ensuring its safety and regulatory compliance remains a significant challenge. This study investigates the comparative strengths and limitations of econometric methods and machine learning in supporting policymaking. Leveraging publicly accessible data from port state control (PSC) inspections as the case study, we develop models to identify key factors influencing ship deficiencies (i.e., non-compliance) in PSC and to predict the number of deficiencies during inspections. The results show that machine learning outperforms econometric methods in predictive performance, while econometric methods offer unique advantages in providing interpretable causal insights, enabling a deep understanding of the factors influencing ship deficiencies. Furthermore, by integrating machine learning techniques into econometric frameworks, we uncover nuanced relationships — such as the heterogeneous impact of ship age on ship deficiencies and a U-shaped relationship between ship tonnage and deficiencies — while also enhancing the predictive reliability of econometric methods. By combining the interpretability of econometric methods with the predictive power of machine learning, this study establishes a robust framework for assessing ship risk, enhancing maritime safety management, mitigating maritime risks, and improving transportation policies and regulations.
期刊介绍:
Transportation Research: Part A contains papers of general interest in all passenger and freight transportation modes: policy analysis, formulation and evaluation; planning; interaction with the political, socioeconomic and physical environment; design, management and evaluation of transportation systems. Topics are approached from any discipline or perspective: economics, engineering, sociology, psychology, etc. Case studies, survey and expository papers are included, as are articles which contribute to unification of the field, or to an understanding of the comparative aspects of different systems. Papers which assess the scope for technological innovation within a social or political framework are also published. The journal is international, and places equal emphasis on the problems of industrialized and non-industrialized regions.
Part A''s aims and scope are complementary to Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Part C: Emerging Technologies and Part D: Transport and Environment. Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review. Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour. The complete set forms the most cohesive and comprehensive reference of current research in transportation science.