Robert F. Riley MD, MS , Stephen Kidd MD , Juliette Power MD , Brian Stegman MD , Thom G. Dahle MD
{"title":"Comparative Effectiveness of 2 Next-Generation Scatter Radiation Shielding Systems","authors":"Robert F. Riley MD, MS , Stephen Kidd MD , Juliette Power MD , Brian Stegman MD , Thom G. Dahle MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jscai.2025.103786","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Scatter radiation is a health risk for personnel in x-ray–guided procedure rooms. This study compared the effectiveness of scatter radiation reduction from 2 next-generation radiation shielding systems.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Vertical poles with mounted radiation survey meters were positioned at 6 points around a catheterization laboratory imaging table where procedural staff typically stand. Meters were mounted on vertical tracks where the sensor could be raised on the track with stops every 20 cm (up to 200 cm). Fluoroscopy (15 frames per second) was then performed on an anthropomorphic phantom with a cardiac silhouette in PA and 4 quadrant angulations using a Philips Allura C-arm with a 9-inch detector and ClarityIQ dose reduction software (both Philips). Scatter radiation measurements were reported in μSv/h under 3 radiation shielding conditions: no shielding, using the Rampart IC shielding system, and using the EggNest Complete shielding system (Egg Medical Inc).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Scatter radiation was not evenly distributed around the table, with higher doses noted at the head of the bed compared to the feet and on the left side of the table compared to the right. Positions correlating with the primary operator and assistant had similarly significant average reductions in scatter radiation for both novel protection systems (EggNest Complete 3 ± 7 μSv/h vs Rampart IC 10 ± 40 μSv/h; <em>P</em> = .18). However, the EggNest Complete system showed substantial reductions in scatter radiation measurements compared to the Rampart IC for positions at the head of the bed and the nursing position (26 ± 56 vs 131 ± 157 μSv/h; <em>P</em> < .01). These results were similar in all standard x-ray angulations.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Compared to no shielding, both the EggNest Complete and the Rampart IC systems significantly lowered radiation measurements for the operator and assistant positions. However, the EggNest Complete system provided additional significant protection for the head of the bed and the nurse positions, which was not seen with the Rampart IC system.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73990,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions","volume":"4 8","pages":"Article 103786"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772930325012281","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Scatter radiation is a health risk for personnel in x-ray–guided procedure rooms. This study compared the effectiveness of scatter radiation reduction from 2 next-generation radiation shielding systems.
Methods
Vertical poles with mounted radiation survey meters were positioned at 6 points around a catheterization laboratory imaging table where procedural staff typically stand. Meters were mounted on vertical tracks where the sensor could be raised on the track with stops every 20 cm (up to 200 cm). Fluoroscopy (15 frames per second) was then performed on an anthropomorphic phantom with a cardiac silhouette in PA and 4 quadrant angulations using a Philips Allura C-arm with a 9-inch detector and ClarityIQ dose reduction software (both Philips). Scatter radiation measurements were reported in μSv/h under 3 radiation shielding conditions: no shielding, using the Rampart IC shielding system, and using the EggNest Complete shielding system (Egg Medical Inc).
Results
Scatter radiation was not evenly distributed around the table, with higher doses noted at the head of the bed compared to the feet and on the left side of the table compared to the right. Positions correlating with the primary operator and assistant had similarly significant average reductions in scatter radiation for both novel protection systems (EggNest Complete 3 ± 7 μSv/h vs Rampart IC 10 ± 40 μSv/h; P = .18). However, the EggNest Complete system showed substantial reductions in scatter radiation measurements compared to the Rampart IC for positions at the head of the bed and the nursing position (26 ± 56 vs 131 ± 157 μSv/h; P < .01). These results were similar in all standard x-ray angulations.
Conclusions
Compared to no shielding, both the EggNest Complete and the Rampart IC systems significantly lowered radiation measurements for the operator and assistant positions. However, the EggNest Complete system provided additional significant protection for the head of the bed and the nurse positions, which was not seen with the Rampart IC system.
背景散射辐射对在x射线引导下的手术室工作人员的健康构成威胁。本研究比较了两种下一代辐射屏蔽系统降低散射辐射的效果。方法置管室显像台周围6个点放置安装有辐射测量仪的垂直杆。仪表安装在垂直轨道上,传感器可以在轨道上抬起,每20厘米(最多200厘米)停止一次。然后使用Philips Allura c型臂,带9英寸探测器和ClarityIQ剂量减少软件(均为Philips),对具有PA和4象限角度的心脏轮廓的拟人化幻影进行透视(每秒15帧)。在无屏蔽、Rampart IC屏蔽系统和EggNest Complete屏蔽系统(Egg Medical Inc .) 3种辐射屏蔽条件下,以μSv/h为单位测量了散射辐射。结果散射辐射在桌子周围的分布并不均匀,床头比脚高,桌子左边比右边高。在两种新型防护系统中,与主要操作人员和辅助人员相关的位置具有相似的显著的平均散射辐射降低(EggNest Complete 3±7 μSv/h vs Rampart IC 10±40 μSv/h; P = 0.18)。然而,与Rampart IC相比,EggNest Complete系统在床头位置和护理位置的散射辐射测量值显著降低(26±56 vs 131±157 μSv/h; P < 0.01)。这些结果与所有标准x线角度相似。结论:与无屏蔽相比,EggNest Complete和Rampart IC系统都显著降低了操作员和辅助位置的辐射测量值。然而,EggNest完整系统为床头和护士位置提供了额外的重要保护,这是Rampart IC系统所没有的。